|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SCIENCE REPUBLICANS: Are a conservative into keeping America's at theLeading Edge?
http://groups.google.com/group/scien...lnk=gcis&hl=en
Science Republicans is about forming a caucus - of individuals and, if possible, within the Congress and/or the Republican Party - who see that Big Science and Big Space are equivalent to Military Expenditure. Big Science, including Basic Research (i.e., research into the basic laws of physics, etc.) AND Tech/Applied Research (say, including Quantum Computing, etc.), AND Big Space (manned and unmanned exploration of the Solar System and beyond), are equivalent to military expenditure. This is because of the direct relationship between Science and General Tech, and Military Technology. But it also would help the economy by developing entire new industries, the way the Apollo Program created the microchip, for example. Big Science includes such things as particle colliders and fields such as Space, Physics, Energy, Bio/Genetics, Earth and Planetary Sciences, etc. Big Space includes a major push and long term commitment to explore the Solar System and beyond, both with Man and Machine. Science Republicans would assert that scientific research and space exploration deserve funding levels equiavalent to military expenditure and/or the Apollo-Era Space program. This is because keeping America at the top of these areas is at least as vital now as it was during the Cold War. Major research in these areas, Science and Space, keep our military technologically superior and help build entire new industries and segments of the economy. Also, the Prestige Factor is still vital, now, as during the Cold War. Science Republicans are ideally Pro-Life, Pro-Military, Conservative on Social Issues (Marriage, Family, etc.) and conservative on fiscal policy. Placing a Science and Space Agenda alongside Defense is logical and therefore presses for major funding for space and science at levels of significant percentages of the total federal budget. This spending would be far above the current levels of spending in these areas. Also, Science Republicans, unlike some other entities, would be open to those on all sides in such controversies as Creation/Evolution/ Intelligent Design, Big Bang Busted?, Young .vs. Old Earth and Cosmos, Global Warming, etc. If you would like to join Science Republicans discussion group, please send me a message telling briefly about yourself and your interests, and the reason(s) why you would like to join. Also, please be patient. NOTE: This group does not yet have its own website. However, a related website, as to human space exploration, is: http://1mmph.yolasite.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
SCIENCE REPUBLICANS: Are a conservative into keeping America's atthe Leading Edge?
On May 6, 7:06*pm, Frank
I meant to say. "Are you a Conservative...." into Keeping America at the leading edge |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
SCIENCE REPUBLICANS: Are a conservative into keeping America's at the Leading Edge?
Frank Robertson wrote in news:baf4c50e-2bc4-40da-
: Also, Science Republicans, unlike some other entities, would be open to those on all sides in such controversies as Creation/Evolution/ Intelligent Design, Big Bang Busted?, Young .vs. Old Earth and Cosmos, Global Warming, etc. Clearly, your agenda has nothing to do with science. --Damon |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
SCIENCE REPUBLICANS: Are a conservative into keeping America's atthe Leading Edge?
On May 6, 7:40*pm, Damon Hill wrote:
Frank Robertson wrote in news:baf4c50e-2bc4-40da- : Also, Science Republicans, unlike some other entities, would be open to those on all sides in such controversies as Creation/Evolution/ Intelligent Design, Big Bang Busted?, Young .vs. Old Earth and Cosmos, Global Warming, etc. Clearly, your agenda has nothing to do with science. --Damon Well spoken Damon. The issues listed are simply smoke and mirror used to distract from the real agenda. So what will his list of smoke and mirrors consist of in this new party? What will the new plan be? Will it have a new hit list on America? Perhaps a plan for the creative evolution of the industrial base, or seeking an intelligent design of the nation energy sources, or perhaps busting the oversized jail and prison system, or developing the health sciences such that people can grow young on an old earth, or will it be just more blowing hot and cold on the issues and sending the wealth up the social ladder and the jobs out of country? The very last I suspect. Trig |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
SCIENCE REPUBLICANS: Are a conservative into keeping America'satthe Leading Edge?
Shoot. The only reason the United States made it to the moon was because of the efforts of our captured Nazi rocket scientist. It wasn't a bunch of Birkenstock wearing vegan socialist hippies that got us there. We can't even duplicate the achievement they made with slide rules and adding machines with modern super computers. I donno. Would you call SS Major Von Braun and his team "conservative"? I hear Conservatives called Nazi all the time. Well, here's some real Nazis. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Conservative Force Law from Nothing (A Bit of Fun) | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 8 | January 5th 10 02:50 PM |
Republicans continue their war against science | jacob navia[_2_] | Policy | 30 | February 17th 09 01:50 AM |
Conservative Change | Foul Weather Patriot | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 9th 08 03:59 PM |
ok mutter her secret conservative | Candy[_3_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 7th 07 06:55 AM |
ISS being used for cutting edge, vital science | Rich | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 28th 06 01:07 AM |