|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
First Viable Business on Luna
A Public remotely operated lunarover would make a lotttt of money and be cheap to start. There are teleoperated webcams on earth so it's not rocket science.
Imagine moving a rover on luna from your home computer. Wouldn't you pay at least 20 bucks a minute for that thrill? Are you listning Elon? Let's invent a Lunar presence NOWWWW |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
First Viable Business on Luna
Allen Meece wrote:
A Public remotely operated lunarover would make a lotttt of money and be cheap to start. How's that work again? There are teleoperated webcams on earth so it's not rocket science. Actually it is 'rocket science'. That whole 'remote vehicle on the Moon' thing, you know. Imagine moving a rover on luna from your home computer. Wouldn't you pay at least 20 bucks a minute for that thrill? No. Why would I and how are you going to recover development and boost costs? What happens when some ****** wrecks it trying to jump a crater? Do the math. Suppose you could book this thing solid for a year. You'd get back half a million dollars, which won't even cover the operating costs. Are you listning Elon? Let's invent a Lunar presence NOWWWW Wow, another guy who thinks he's smarter than Elon Musk... -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
First Viable Business on Luna
On Mar/21/2017 at 5:51 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote :
Allen Meece wrote: A Public remotely operated lunarover would make a lotttt of money and be cheap to start. How's that work again? There are teleoperated webcams on earth so it's not rocket science. Actually it is 'rocket science'. That whole 'remote vehicle on the Moon' thing, you know. Imagine moving a rover on luna from your home computer. Wouldn't you pay at least 20 bucks a minute for that thrill? No. Why would I and how are you going to recover development and boost costs? What happens when some ****** wrecks it trying to jump a crater? Do the math. Suppose you could book this thing solid for a year. You'd get back half a million dollars, which won't even cover the operating costs. I mostly agree with you on this. But I think you forgot the 20$/minutes part here. A year is about half a million minutes. Booked solid for a year gives a little over 10 M$. Alain Fournier |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
First Viable Business on Luna
Alain Fournier wrote:
On Mar/21/2017 at 5:51 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote : Allen Meece wrote: A Public remotely operated lunarover would make a lotttt of money and be cheap to start. How's that work again? There are teleoperated webcams on earth so it's not rocket science. Actually it is 'rocket science'. That whole 'remote vehicle on the Moon' thing, you know. Imagine moving a rover on luna from your home computer. Wouldn't you pay at least 20 bucks a minute for that thrill? No. Why would I and how are you going to recover development and boost costs? What happens when some ****** wrecks it trying to jump a crater? Do the math. Suppose you could book this thing solid for a year. You'd get back half a million dollars, which won't even cover the operating costs. I mostly agree with you on this. But I think you forgot the 20$/minutes part here. A year is about half a million minutes. Booked solid for a year gives a little over 10 M$. Arithmetic in public. Still not enough to recover operating costs. -- "Well, I met a girl in West Hollywood. I ain't naming names. She really worked me over good. She was just like Jesse James. She really worked me over good. She was a credit to her gender. She put me through some changes, Lord. Sort of like a Waring blender." -- Warren Zevon, "Poor, Poor, Pitiful Me" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
One more reason why spaceflight without Orion technology is not viable | RichA[_6_] | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | May 6th 15 11:19 AM |
Scientists grow viable vaginas in lab ... | Hägar | Misc | 6 | April 14th 14 03:18 PM |
A viable option to quantizing gravity? | kurtan | Research | 0 | January 24th 05 10:14 AM |
Lowest altitude viable Mars orbit | Explorer8939 | Technology | 14 | March 12th 04 02:58 PM |