|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, Fossil Fuels Did Save Us from an Ice Age
This article on Ars Technica
http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/...r-a-long-time/ refers to a paper that attempted to determine at what carbon dioxide concentration would natural cycles have led to a new ice age at the normally expected time. John Savard |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, Fossil Fuels Did Save Us from an Ice Age
On Wednesday, 13 January 2016 18:28:34 UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote:
This article on Ars Technica http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/...r-a-long-time/ refers to a paper that attempted to determine at what carbon dioxide concentration would natural cycles have led to a new ice age at the normally expected time. John Savard Just like with any warming, only idiots see it as a bad thing. The cold is no good to anyone. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, Fossil Fuels Did Save Us from an Ice Age
On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 6:39:00 PM UTC-6, RichA wrote:
On Wednesday, 13 January 2016 18:28:34 UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote: This article on Ars Technica http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/...r-a-long-time/ refers to a paper that attempted to determine at what carbon dioxide concentration would natural cycles have led to a new ice age at the normally expected time. John Savard Just like with any warming, only idiots see it as a bad thing. The cold is no good to anyone. Pork is well done at 160F. Oh right, you Canadians don't know what degrees F means ;^)) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, Fossil Fuels Did Save Us from an Ice Age
Uncarollo2 wrote:
On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 6:39:00 PM UTC-6, RichA wrote: On Wednesday, 13 January 2016 18:28:34 UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote: This article on Ars Technica http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/...r-a-long-time/ refers to a paper that attempted to determine at what carbon dioxide concentration would natural cycles have led to a new ice age at the normally expected time. John Savard Just like with any warming, only idiots see it as a bad thing. The cold is no good to anyone. Pork is well done at 160F. Oh right, you Canadians don't know what degrees F means ;^)) I roast pork at 160C 30 minutes per half Kg and a few minutes over. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, Fossil Fuels Did Save Us from an Ice Age
On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 7:11:19 PM UTC-6, Mike Collins wrote:
Uncarollo2 wrote: On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 6:39:00 PM UTC-6, RichA wrote: On Wednesday, 13 January 2016 18:28:34 UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote: This article on Ars Technica http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/...r-a-long-time/ refers to a paper that attempted to determine at what carbon dioxide concentration would natural cycles have led to a new ice age at the normally expected time. John Savard Just like with any warming, only idiots see it as a bad thing. The cold is no good to anyone. Pork is well done at 160F. Oh right, you Canadians don't know what degrees F means ;^)) I roast pork at 160C 30 minutes per half Kg and a few minutes over. Yes, oven temp is 160C. Pork internal temp is far less. If it reaches 160C, it will be dry as a fart. I cook too, every Sunday, all day. People will dry out and die at a wet bulb temperature of 35C. This has never happened for long periods of time, but it only takes 4 - 5 hours and all living mammals will die under those conditions. Closest that has come to this was in Saudi Arabia along the Persian Gulf in summer. From Wiki: A sustained wet-bulb temperature exceeding 35 °C (95 °F) is likely to be fatal even to fit and healthy people, unclothed in the shade next to a fan; at this temperature our bodies switch from shedding heat to the environment, to gaining heat from it.[7] Thus 35 °C is the threshold beyond which the body is no longer able to adequately cool itself. A study by NOAA from 2013 concluded that heat stress will reduce labor capacity considerably under current emissions scenarios.[8] A study by Purdue University concluded that under a worst case scenario for global warming, the wet-bulb temperature limit for humans could be exceeded around much of the world in future centuries.[9] An example of the threshold at which the human body is no longer able to cool itself and begins to overheat is a humidity level of 50% and a high heat of 46 °C (115 °F), as this would indicate a wet-bulb temperature of 35 °C (95 °F).[10] |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, Fossil Fuels Did Save Us from an Ice Age
On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 7:44:36 PM UTC-5, Uncarollo2 wrote:
On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 6:39:00 PM UTC-6, RichA wrote: On Wednesday, 13 January 2016 18:28:34 UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote: This article on Ars Technica http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/...r-a-long-time/ refers to a paper that attempted to determine at what carbon dioxide concentration would natural cycles have led to a new ice age at the normally expected time. John Savard Just like with any warming, only idiots see it as a bad thing. The cold is no good to anyone. Pork is well done at 160F. Oh right, you Canadians don't know what degrees F means ;^)) And you can survive in a sauna at the same temp, for a while anyway. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, Fossil Fuels Did Save Us from an Ice Age
On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 12:03:05 AM UTC-5, Uncarollo2 wrote:
On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 7:11:19 PM UTC-6, Mike Collins wrote: Uncarollo2 wrote: On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 6:39:00 PM UTC-6, RichA wrote: On Wednesday, 13 January 2016 18:28:34 UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote: This article on Ars Technica http://arstechnica.com/science/2016/...r-a-long-time/ refers to a paper that attempted to determine at what carbon dioxide concentration would natural cycles have led to a new ice age at the normally expected time. John Savard Just like with any warming, only idiots see it as a bad thing. The cold is no good to anyone. Pork is well done at 160F. Oh right, you Canadians don't know what degrees F means ;^)) I roast pork at 160C 30 minutes per half Kg and a few minutes over. Yes, oven temp is 160C. Pork internal temp is far less. If it reaches 160C, it will be dry as a fart. I cook too, every Sunday, all day. People will dry out and die at a wet bulb temperature of 35C. This has never happened for long periods of time, but it only takes 4 - 5 hours and all living mammals will die under those conditions. Closest that has come to this was in Saudi Arabia along the Persian Gulf in summer. From Wiki: A sustained wet-bulb temperature exceeding 35 °C (95 °F) is likely to be fatal even to fit and healthy people, unclothed in the shade next to a fan; at this temperature our bodies switch from shedding heat to the environment, to gaining heat from it.[7] Thus 35 °C is the threshold beyond which the body is no longer able to adequately cool itself. A study by NOAA from 2013 concluded that heat stress will reduce labor capacity considerably under current emissions scenarios.[8] A study by Purdue University concluded that under a worst case scenario for global warming, the wet-bulb temperature limit for humans could be exceeded around much of the world in future centuries.[9] An example of the threshold at which the human body is no longer able to cool itself and begins to overheat is a humidity level of 50% and a high heat of 46 °C (115 °F), as this would indicate a wet-bulb temperature of 35 °C (95 °F).[10] Please, eat the pork raw. I'd love global warming kooks to all get trichinosis. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gel rocket fuels | Pat Flannery | Policy | 20 | January 30th 09 12:58 PM |
merits of some liquid fuels | [email protected] | Policy | 8 | November 27th 07 08:12 PM |
....Congress Wrestles with replacing Fossil Fuels.! | Jonathan | Policy | 19 | June 27th 07 01:24 PM |
....Congress Wrestles with replacing Fossil Fuels.! | Jonathan | History | 19 | June 27th 07 01:24 PM |
Sun fuels cosmic search | Jason H. | SETI | 0 | December 21st 03 08:16 AM |