|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Every action has.. ) Closed but has inner energy to go up
Ody Since you jumped in with your two cents this question is for you.
It takes energy as pointed out to get a swing going,and the person on the seat is its pendulum bob and supplying that energy no outside force needed. We now go to the Earth's north pole. A pendulum clock is swinging back and forth in the corner of a large room. I bring in another pendulum clock that is swinging completely out of rhythm with the other pendulum clock,and place it in the opposite corner. Here is the kicker. In a very short time both pendulums are swinging in exact unison. My question to you Ody is this It took energy to get their heavy bobs to react in unison (yes?) Show me its counter reaction I can keep this post going forever. It is a great morning mind exercise to get the cobwebs(Bud light) out of my head. Go figure Bert |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Every action has.. ) Closed but has inner energy to go up
Ody A pendulum shows action and equal reaction so clearly,and yet are
their swing completely 100% equal? Is inertia 100% equal to gravity? Is accelerating 100% equal to inertia? Is force of impact 100% equal to weight + speed etc Can time be factored in? Most surely great distance it is a factor. Go figure Bert |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Every action has.. ) Closed but has inner energy to go up
On Jul 6, 6:08*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Ody *A pendulum shows action and equal reaction so clearly,and yet are their swing completely 100% equal? *Is inertia 100% equal to gravity? Is accelerating 100% equal to inertia? *Is force of impact 100% equal to weight + speed * * * *etc * Can time be factored in? *Most surely *great distance it is a factor. *Go figure Bert Pendulums show that heavy objects and light objects fall at the same speed, begause a pendulum with a heavy bob will swing at the same rate as a pendulum with a ligjht bob. Only the length of the shaft makes a difference. Double-A |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Perfect vacuums are infinitely expensive.
Air is not a perfect vacuum .. perfect vacuums are infinitely expensive;
so, given the same surface, a heavier a pendulum ticks longer. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Perfect vacuums are infinitely expensive.
On Jul 6, 1:40 pm, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
Air is not a perfect vacuum .. perfect vacuums are infinitely expensive; so, given the same surface, a heavier a pendulum ticks longer. Oddly, we can all look directly at the 1e-21 bar vacuum of the Selene/ moon L1, and it's essentially free for the taking. I mean, how good of a near perfect vacuum deal is that? - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
If getting to L1 allowed us to breed faster, we'd already be there.
The Earth-Moon L1's “ 10^-21 bar vacuum ” isn't “ free for the taking ”.
Helium is used to pre-cool liquid hydrogen, the Saturn V booster ( Apollo ) needed about 13 million cubic feet of helium to launch. Helium is very expensive, especially liquid helium. If getting to L1 allowed us to breed faster, we'd already be there. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
If getting to L1 allowed us to breed faster, we'd already bethere.
On Jul 6, 5:04 pm, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
The Earth-Moon L1's $B!H(B 10^-21 bar vacuum $B!I(B isn't $B!H(B free for the taking $B!I(B. It actually is less than dirt cheap and first come first served, and it looks as though China is going to be in charge of the Selene/moon L1. I hope we can remain nice to China, because otherwise that nifty L-1 could offer China quite a tactical (aka star wars) advantage. Helium is used to pre-cool liquid hydrogen, the Saturn V booster ( Apollo ) needed about 13 million cubic feet of helium to launch. Helium is very expensive, especially liquid helium. If getting to L1 allowed us to breed faster, we'd already be there. I'm not well enough informed about all of that spendy Helium. However, that's certainly a valid though weird argument about using the moon's L1, however our DNA might have to evolve into something a bit rad-hard, or at least as good as that of a cockroach, that is unless we had a substantial load of nifty shielding as protecting our Earth-moon L1 abode. - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Every action has.. ) Closed but has inner energy to go up
Double-A Length of pendulum staff is the same as planets distance from
the Sun. To prove your point Jupiter and Earth can switch orbits with no problem. You don't have to drop stuff off the tower of Piza,you can use an incline plane. Bert |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Every action has.. ) Closed but has inner energy to go up
On Jul 7, 5:49*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Double-A Length of pendulum staff is the same as planets distance from the Sun. *To prove your point Jupiter and Earth can switch orbits with no problem. Good point. You don't have to drop stuff off the tower of Piza,you can use an incline plane. * * * * *Bert Yes. An incline plane can help you access that tower of pizzas. Yum! Double-A |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Perfect vacuums are infinitely expensive.
On Jul 6, 1:40 pm, Jeff$B"%(BRelf wrote:
Air is not a perfect vacuum .. perfect vacuums are infinitely expensive; so, given the same surface, a heavier a pendulum ticks longer. But no faster or slower. Double-A |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Every action has equal & opposite reaction? | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | June 26th 08 09:09 PM |
Action and Reaction =0 or -0 or+0 | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | January 7th 07 10:27 PM |
Action-reaction in space: the "gyrodine war" heats up (Oberg) | Jim Oberg | Space Station | 0 | February 28th 05 05:40 PM |
Momentum from Nothing: Action Without Reaction? | sanman | Technology | 6 | February 5th 04 06:27 PM |
calculating the distance of equal an opposite gravitational pull between the moon and earth | Jason | Technology | 2 | October 21st 03 10:37 PM |