|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Every action has equal & opposite reaction?
Double -A Very Very good I did a What if in my other group on what you
just posted. Like gravity can't be detected in a Planck length. It was title "What if on ultra short distances" I got an email on it from Russia on it Go figure bert |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Every action has equal & opposite reaction?
On Jul 3, 12:32*pm, Double-A wrote, replying to
oc: The 'pull' force is entirely a pseudo or fictitious force, i.e., 'suction'. It's the same as the much-touted Bernoulli effect above an aircraft wing "pulling" the wing up. The *real* force is the push of the wind against the sail and the push of the airstream against the bottom of the plane's wing. In both cases, Newton explains the cause, Bernoulli describes the (perceived) effect. Thing is though, whether push or pull, all forces on the micro level are actions at a distance. Under the FS model of gravity, it's entirely "push" all the way down to the core of the atomic nucleus. Herein lies unification of gravity and the strong nuclear force, as discussed many times in relation to the Casimir effect. "Action at a distance" is itself a pseudo force. Picture a rubber ducky floating in a bathtub while the tub is draining. It might appear that 'action at a distance' is pulling him toward the drain. But it is a push, not a pull. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
I *knew* you was playin' wif me! (was - Every action has . . .)
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote...
in message ... Timber If I did not make myself clear I apologize. If I'm talking over you head I will still apologise for it is never my intent to hurt a persons feelings. I can't help it if you have a low IQ,or are a dim wit. I have taken a very unpopular view I know that. Still Im running pretty good with it. It is in reality an exercise in thinking,and having the great minds of Painius and oc posting and being to kind to call me a idiot as I frustrate them shows how nice they are,two of my dearest virtual friends always Bert You playin' wif me, Bert? I'll ne'er speaka to you again! (Till nexx time) Is there such a thing as ... "time"? happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S.: Thank YOU for reading! P.P.S.: http://painellsworth.net |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
I *knew* you was playin' wif me! (was - Every action has . . .)
Painius I'm as serious as I can get after two 6 packs of Bud light. The
4th is one of my best holidays,and best excuse for drinking to much. Glad the word "push" is being used a lot because that is the real reason the rocket's engine is doing its job of pushing the rocket forward. Playing a mind game with you oc and Double-A like all games are fun when played fairly on a level playing field. Did any one figure out what can lift itself of the ground with only an internal force? No outside push or pull needed I think as I got older I got where I like to argue,and really don't care which side I'm on You see Painius Newtons thoughts can be challenged. Einstein knew that Best to keep in mind Newton like particles better than waves,and yet Bert |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
I *knew* you was playin' wif me! (was - Every action has .+Time
Time is real and it has 5 arrows,and one of the arrows is pointed in the
opposite direction Bert |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Every action has.. )
On Jul 4, 6:52 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Did any one figure out what can lift itself of the ground with only an internal force? No outside push or pull needed. Inertial propulsion or reactionless drives are in the same realm as 'perpetual motion' machines. No matter how cleverly crafted or portrayed, the concept ends up violating conservation of momentum. F'reggzample, see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_propulsion_engine You see Newtons thoughts can be challenged. Einstein knew that Best to keep in mind Newton liked particles better than waves, and yet... (hic). |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Every action has.. )
"oldcoot" wrote in message...
... On Jul 4, 6:52 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Did any one figure out what can lift itself of the ground with only an internal force? No outside push or pull needed. Inertial propulsion or reactionless drives are in the same realm as 'perpetual motion' machines. No matter how cleverly crafted or portrayed, the concept ends up violating conservation of momentum. F'reggzample, see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_propulsion_engine Mebbe Bert's talkin' about... plants? happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S.: Thank YOU for reading! P.P.S.: http://painellsworth.net |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Every action has.. ) Closed but has inner energy to go up
OK guys best I tell you what can do this,for I have to do what Cactus
Saul so rightly pointed out(short posts are best) and I have been doing the 4th on boiler makers. Mother nature made Mexican jumping beans(I bought them as a kid. They were fun to watch. Inside was a tiny white worm. It was a clever worm and never heard about Newton's laws. In the darkness of this inclosed shell it knew which side was up.and its put energy on that up side and took the shell with him. Best not to argue with mother nature Bert |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Every action has.. ) Closed but has inner energy to go up
Yeah Bert, but suspend the Mexican jumping bean in free space. How's
it going to "jump"? :-) Reactionless drives have to be able to work in free space, out of any contact with air, water, or the ground. So far, none have ever panned out because there was always sumpin' for them to react 'against', like the jumping bean sittin' on the ground. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Every action has.. ) Closed but has inner energy to go up
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote...
in message ... OK guys best I tell you what can do this,for I have to do what Cactus Saul so rightly pointed out(short posts are best) and I have been doing the 4th on boiler makers. Mother nature made Mexican jumping beans(I bought them as a kid. They were fun to watch. Inside was a tiny white worm. It was a clever worm and never heard about Newton's laws. In the darkness of this inclosed shell it knew which side was up.and its put energy on that up side and took the shell with him. Best not to argue with mother nature Bert No argument there, Bert... http://waynesword.palomar.edu/plaug97.htm "Probably the most interesting thing about Mexican jumping bean shrubs are the remarkable 'beans' that jerk and roll about with seemingly perpetual motion. It is doubtful (or very rare) that they actually "jump" above the surface of the ground, but they can certainly roll and tumble along in different directions. Just as pineapples are not apples and peanuts are not nuts, the jumping bean is not a bean, nor is it a seed. It is actually a small, thin-shelled section of a seed capsule containing the larva of a small gray moth called the jumping bean moth (Laspeyresia saltitans). After consuming the seed within the capsule section, the robust, yellowish-white larva has the peculiar habit of throwing itself forcibly from one wall to the other, thereby causing the jumping movements of the capsule. Mexican jumping bean capsules typically separate into three parts or sections, some of which contain a moth larva. It is these separate sections (technically called carpels) that are sold as 'jumping beans'." Nothing that breaks Newton's laws here. This is akin to being inside a large, flexible ball and causing it to roll all over the place. Or rolling all over in a large innertube. And there's no going "up"! Mexican jumping beans can roll all over the place, but they don't leave the ground. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S.: Thank YOU for reading! P.P.S.: http://painellsworth.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Every action has equal & opposite reaction? | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | June 26th 08 09:09 PM |
Action and Reaction =0 or -0 or+0 | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 0 | January 7th 07 10:27 PM |
Action-reaction in space: the "gyrodine war" heats up (Oberg) | Jim Oberg | Space Station | 0 | February 28th 05 05:40 PM |
Momentum from Nothing: Action Without Reaction? | sanman | Technology | 6 | February 5th 04 06:27 PM |
calculating the distance of equal an opposite gravitational pull between the moon and earth | Jason | Technology | 2 | October 21st 03 10:37 PM |