If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. 


Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1




Einstein and Feynman Brainwash the Gullible World
Correct argument establishing that the speed of light will always be measured to be constant, c, if the experiment is entirely performed within the (inertial) system of the observer (no interaction with the outside world):
A railway carriage is traveling at speed v. An emitter at the back end of the carriage sends a light beam towards the front end. A device at the front end of the carriage measures the speed of the beam. Assumption: The speed of the light beam is measured to be c'=cv. Conclusion: The assumption contradicts the principle of relativity and should be rejected. The speed of the light beam is measured to be unchanged, c'=c. Pernicious brainwashing practiced by Einstein and Feynman (brainwashed people become totally unable to understand the principle of relativity): Einstein and Feynman use essentially the same argument (draw the same conclusion) but fraudulently change the location of the emitter. The emitter is no longer on the moving vehicle (carriage or car) but belongs to the stationary system  e.g. is fixed on the embankment: Albert Einstein: "If a ray of light be sent along the embankment, we see from the above that the tip of the ray will be transmitted with the velocity c relative to the embankment. Now let us suppose that our railway carriage is again travelling along the railway lines with the velocity v, and that its direction is the same as that of the ray of light, but its velocity of course much less. Let us inquire about the velocity of propagation of the ray of light relative to the carriage. It is obvious that we can here apply the consideration of the previous section, since the ray of light plays the part of the man walking along relatively to the carriage. The velocity W of the man relative to the embankment is here replaced by the velocity of light relative to the embankment. w is the required velocity of light with respect to the carriage, and we have w = c  v. The velocity of propagation of a ray of light relative to the carriage thus comes out smaller than c. But this result comes into conflict with the principle of relativity set forth in Section V." http://www.bartleby.com/173/7.html Albert Einstein, On the Principle of Relativity: "After all, when a beam of light travels with a stated velocity relative to one observer, then  so it seems  a second observer who is himself traveling in the direction of the propagation of the light beam should find the light beam propagating at a lesser velocity than the first observer does. If this were really true, then the law of light propagation in vacuum would not be the same for two observers who are in relative, uniform motion to each other  in contradiction to the principle of relativity stated above." https://einsteinpapers.press.princet.../vol6trans/16 Richard Feynman: "Suppose we are riding in a car that is going at a speed u, and light from the rear is going past the car with speed c. Differentiating the first equation in (15.2) gives dx'/dt=dx/dtu, which means that according to the Galilean transformation the apparent speed of the passing light, as we measure it in the car, should not be c but should be cu. For instance, if the car is going 100,000 mi/sec, and the light is going 186,000 mi/sec, then apparently the light going past the car should go 86,000 mi/sec. In any case, by measuring the speed of the light going past the car (if the Galilean transformation is correct for light), one could determine the speed of the car. A number of experiments based on this general idea were performed to determine the velocity of the earth, but they all failed  they gave no velocity at all." http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_15.html It is a total mystery why the scientific community has been worshiping EinsteinFeynman idiotic argument for more than a century. Pentcho Valev 
Ads 
#2




Einstein and Feynman Brainwash the Gullible World
Perhaps the greatest idiocy in the history of science:
In 1918 Einstein informed the gullible world that, as the traveling clock (twin) turns around and experiences acceleration, a HOMOGENEOUS gravitational field emerges. This homogeneous gravitational field somehow affects the distant stayathome clock and makes it run very fast (makes the stayathome twin get very old) during the turningaround period: Albert Einstein 1918: "A homogeneous gravitational field appears, that is directed towards the positive xaxis. Clock U1 is accelerated in the direction of the positive xaxis until it has reached the velocity v, then the gravitational field disappears again. An external force, acting upon U2 in the negative direction of the xaxis prevents U2 from being set in motion by the gravitational field. [...] According to the general theory of relativity, a clock will go faster the higher the gravitational potential of the location where it is located, and during partial process 3 U2 happens to be located at a higher gravitational potential than U1. The calculation shows that this speeding ahead constitutes exactly twice as much as the lagging behind during the partial processes 2 and 4." http://sciliterature.50webs.com/Dialog.htm David Morin, Introduction to Classical Mechanics With Problems and Solutions, Chapter 11, p. 14: "Twin A stays on the earth, while twin B flies quickly to a distant star and back. [...] For the entire outward and return parts of the trip, B does observe A's clock running slow, but ENOUGH STRANGENESS occurs during the turningaround period to make A end up older." http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap11.pdf "When the twin in the spaceship turns around to make his journey home, the shift in his frame of reference causes his perception of his brother's age to change rapidly: he sees his brother getting suddenly older. This means that when the twins are finally reunited, the stayathome twin is the older of the two." http://topquark.hubpages.com/hub/TwinParadox Einstein's 1918 idiocy was a crucial fudge factor that saved the "theory". Without recourse to "enough strangeness" (see David Morin's text above), either twin will find his brother younger when they reunite after the trip. Feynman taught the idiocy diligently but never mentioned the "homogeneous gravitational field" (it is too idiotic, even for the standards of Einstein's schizophrenic world): Richard Feynman: "So the way to state the rule is to say that the man who has felt the accelerations, who has seen things fall against the walls, and so on, is the one who would be the younger." http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_16.html Pentcho Valev 
#3




Einstein and Feynman Brainwash the Gullible World
Einstein and Feynman can be defined as oldfashioned brainwashers  they wouldn't go beyond some limits. Neil deGrasse Tyson, Brian Greene etc. are modern brainwashers  they know no limits. Neil deGrasse Tyson's "cosmic conspiracy of the highest order", for instance, is an incomparably idiotic and at the same time extremely efficient brainwashing idea:
Neil deGrasse Tyson, Death by Black Hole: And Other Cosmic Quandaries, pp. 123124: "If everyone, everywhere and at all times, is to measure the same speed for the beam from your imaginary spacecraft, a number of things have to happen. First of all, as the speed of your spacecraft increases, the length of everything  you, your measuring devices, your spacecraft  shortens in the direction of motion, as seen by everyone else. Furthermore, your own time slows down exactly enough so that when you haul out your newly shortened yardstick, you are guaranteed to be duped into measuring the same old constant value for the speed of light. What we have here is a COSMIC CONSPIRACY OF THE HIGHEST ORDER." https://www.amazon.com/DeathBlackH.../dp/039335038X Brian Greene: "Einstein proposed a truly stunning idea  that space and time could work together, constantly adjusting by exactly the right amount so that no matter how fast you might be moving, when you measure the speed of light it always comes out to be 671000000 miles per hour." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dc329dguFs Michelle Thaller (52:06): "The speed of light is so constant that the universe actually changes everything so that you never see it going any other speed" https://youtu.be/fiv7qUQ51Kc?t=3126 Robert Scherrer: "In fact, the laws for adding and subtracting speeds have to conspire to keep the speed of the light the same no matter how fast or in what direction an observer is moving. The only way to make this happen is for space and time to expand or contact as objects move." http://www.cosmicyarns.com/2015/04/s...eedlimit.html Brian Greene: "If space and time did not behave this way, the speed of light would not be constant and would depend on the observer's state of motion. But it is constant; space and time do behave this way. Space and time adjust themselves in an exactly compensating manner so that observations of light's speed yield the same result, regardless of the observer's velocity." http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics...nutshell.html Constancy of the speed of light  the fundamental falsehood in physics  is imposed on physics students in the same way as the name Bingo is imposed on the dude in this video: Bingo the Clowno https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kACHU5eSwQ&t=78s In the end each student gets the name Bingo the Einsteiniano: http://www.staqs.com/images/Waterloo...in_092005.jpg Pentcho Valev 
#4




Einstein and Feynman Brainwash the Gullible World
All conclusions deducible from Einstein's false constantspeedoflight postulate are idiotic so teaching them destroys human rationality of course. But that's not the end of the story. Einsteinians have discovered that, if instead of the validly deducible idiocy its antithesis (which is non sequitur) is taught, human rationality is IRREVERSIBLY destroyed  no chance for recovery. Divine Albert's Divine Theory reigns supreme and eternal in such circumstances  efficient criticism is unthinkable.
An idiocy validly deducible from Einstein's false constantspeedoflight postulate is that time SPEEDS UP for the moving observer: David Morin, Introduction to Classical Mechanics With Problems and Solutions, Chapter 11, p. 14: "Twin A stays on the earth, while twin B flies quickly to a distant star and back. [...] For the entire outward and return parts of the trip, B does observe A's clock running slow..." http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~djmorin/chap11.pdf "The situation is that a man sets off in a rocket travelling at high speed away from Earth, whilst his twin brother stays on Earth. [...] ...the twin in the spaceship considers himself to be the stationary twin, and therefore as he looks back towards Earth he sees his brother ageing more slowly than himself." http://topquark.hubpages.com/hub/TwinParadox The above two texts are rare exceptions  valid deduction is not cherished in Einstein's schizophrenic world. Einsteinians almost universally teach the antithesis  time SLOWS DOWN for the moving observer: Albert Einstein 1911: "The clock runs slower if it is in uniform motion..." http://einsteinpapers.press.princeto...vol3trans/368 Richard Feynman: "Now if all moving clocks run slower, if no way of measuring time gives anything but a slower rate, we shall just have to say, in a certain sense, that time itself appears to be slower in a space ship." http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_15.html Brian Greene: "If you're moving relative to somebody else, time for you slows down." https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QnmnLmwBmfE Brian Cox (2:25): "Moving clocks run slowly" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8lBIcHre0 John Gribbin: "Einstein's special theory of relativity tells us how the Universe looks to an observer moving at a steady speed. Because the speed of light is the same for all such observers, moving clocks run slow..." http://www.newscientist.com/article/...lativity..html Neil deGrasse Tyson: "We have ways of moving into the future. That is to have time tick more slowly for you than others, who you return to later on. We've known that since 1905, Einstein's special theory of relativity, which gives the precise prescription for how time would slow down for you if you are set into motion." http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/...ry?id=32191481 Jim AlKhalili: "And, the faster you move and the longer you move at that speed, the slower your clock ticks, including your own internal biological clock, and so the slower you age  by tiny, tiny fractions of a second of course." http://www.jimalkhalili.com/blogs/2...mwiththeapp Pentcho Valev 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Einstein and Feynman Brainwash the Gullible World  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  2  March 8th 19 05:58 PM 
How Einsteinians Brainwash the Gullible World  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  3  August 10th 17 11:33 AM 
Gravitational Waves: Einsteinians Brainwash the Gullible World Again  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  3  June 17th 17 09:01 AM 
How Einsteinians Brainwash the World  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  3  July 12th 16 06:31 PM 
EINSTEIN AND THE GULLIBLE WORLD  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  2  June 7th 15 09:33 AM 