|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Moscow...we have a problem.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Moscow...we have a problem.
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message ... http://www.space.com/13554-russia-ma...t-failure.html Hoping for best. Ken Aww. So the Great Martian Ghoul got cheated out of a Russian dinner.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Moscow...we have a problem.
"Matt Wiser" wrote in message
... "Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message ... http://www.space.com/13554-russia-ma...t-failure.html Hoping for best. Ken Aww. So the Great Martian Ghoul got cheated out of a Russian dinner.... Or else his reach now extends all the way to Earth... -- Gordon Davie Edinburgh, Scotland "Slipped the surly bonds of Earth...to touch the face of God." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Moscow...we have a problem.
" Aww. So the Great Martian Ghoul got cheated out of a Russian dinner.... Or else his reach now extends all the way to Earth... -- In response to an on-line petition the Obama White House just told us that there are no extraterrestrials living among us - Maybe they lied? Martian Ghouls no less. I aways figured its was Glondorx the Martian junk dealer who sold the stuff for scrap- but failure in Earth orbit puts a whole new aspect on this. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Moscow...we have a problem.
"Ken S. Tucker" wrote in message ... http://www.space.com/13554-russia-ma...t-failure.html Hoping for best. Ken It's scary - one article said that the Russian tracking system is limited and they needed help from amateur astronomers in South America to help them locate the spacecraft. Sounds like something out of a juvinile Science Fiction Novel - Tom Swift and his Fabulous Telescope Saves the Russian Space Probe. Val Kraut |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Moscow...we have a problem.
Val Kraut wrote:
It's scary - one article said that the Russian tracking system is limited and they needed help from amateur astronomers in South America to help them locate the spacecraft. Sounds like something out of a juvinile Science Fiction Novel - Tom Swift and his Fabulous Telescope Saves the Russian Space Probe. Doesn't China have an up-and-coming tracking system? They just added (or it was just announced they would add) a node in Australia, and this article: http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Ch...ort_ 999.html suggests they have one in Chile. Perhaps the Chinese can assist in saving their hitchhiker? Assuming the Russians are unable to address the problems with the probe, how long before we hear "Hit the grunt, the Russians are coming?" as it comes back to Earth? rick jones -- oxymoron n, Hummer H2 with California Save Our Coasts and Oceans plates these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Moscow...we have a problem.
On Nov 9, 10:33*am, Rick Jones wrote:
Val Kraut wrote: It's scary - one article said that the Russian tracking system is limited and they needed help from amateur astronomers in South America to help them locate the spacecraft. Sounds like something out of a juvinile Science Fiction Novel - Tom Swift and his Fabulous Telescope Saves the Russian Space Probe. Doesn't China have an up-and-coming tracking system? *They just added (or it was just announced they would add) a node in Australia, and this article: http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Ch...pace_tracking_... suggests they have one in Chile. *Perhaps the Chinese can assist in saving their hitchhiker? *Assuming the Russians are unable to address the problems with the probe, how long before we hear "Hit the grunt, the Russians are coming?" as it comes back to Earth? Sigh. If only Shuttle were still flying. This would have made a fabulous rescue mission, if the Russians flight controllers could use the thrusters on the spacecraft itself to keep it in orbit for about 6 months while astronauts and cosmonauts train for the rescue and the equipment and procedures are put together like was done with the LEASAT F3 during STS-51-I in August of 1985 after that satellite was stranded in April of that same year. -Mike |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Moscow...we have a problem.
On 11/09/2011 10:18 PM, Mike DiCenso wrote:
On Nov 9, 10:33 am, Rick wrote: Val wrote: It's scary - one article said that the Russian tracking system is limited and they needed help from amateur astronomers in South America to help them locate the spacecraft. Sounds like something out of a juvinile Science Fiction Novel - Tom Swift and his Fabulous Telescope Saves the Russian Space Probe. Doesn't China have an up-and-coming tracking system? They just added (or it was just announced they would add) a node in Australia, and this article: http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Ch...pace_tracking_... suggests they have one in Chile. Perhaps the Chinese can assist in saving their hitchhiker? Assuming the Russians are unable to address the problems with the probe, how long before we hear "Hit the grunt, the Russians are coming?" as it comes back to Earth? Sigh. If only Shuttle were still flying. This would have made a fabulous rescue mission, if the Russians flight controllers could use the thrusters on the spacecraft itself to keep it in orbit for about 6 months while astronauts and cosmonauts train for the rescue and the equipment and procedures are put together like was done with the LEASAT F3 during STS-51-I in August of 1985 after that satellite was stranded in April of that same year. -Mike Even if the shuttle were still flying we wouldn't have done it. Risky to do EVA on it since it was never designed to be EVA-serviceable, way too risky to return it to Earth, couldn't be done within this Mars launch window (and wouldn't hold out long enough for the next one). And finally, even if all of the above wasn't true, the Russians could build and launch another one for less than the cost of the shuttle mission. STS-125 was a unique one-shot post-Columbia non-ISS mission, made possible only by HST's iconic status and the US's huge investment in it. No way the US government would green-light a far riskier mission for a non-US probe. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Moscow...we have a problem.
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:38:33 -0500, Jeff Findley
wrote: I call B.S. on this. The Russians only have a few days before the orbit decays. When Columbia's TPS was damaged, NASA couldn't have launched a rescue mission in time to save them, and they had many more days of consumables than the Russians have days before their probe's orbit decays. I think the CAIB determined a Shuttle rescue mission for STS-107 was possible, but was right at the razor's edge of being possible. Does anyone really not think the folks at KSC, JSC, and MSFC would have moved heaven and earth to get Atlantis off the pad in time? They would have even had retired Shuttle engineeers and techs coming to the gates volunteering to help. Brian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OT - Moscow Metro | Pat Flannery | History | 31 | October 4th 08 04:13 AM |
OT - Moscow Metro | Pat Flannery | History | 4 | October 1st 08 06:38 AM |
Moscow vs. Houston Time | Danny Deger | Space Station | 1 | August 18th 07 11:20 PM |
Moscow confirms proposal for 12-month Exp-10 | JimO | Space Station | 10 | March 27th 04 10:57 PM |
Welcome to Moscow Astronomy Club! | Denis V. Denissenko | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 22nd 03 07:42 PM |