|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NASA Statement on Success of Russian Progress Launch
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
NASA Statement on Success of Russian Progress Launch
Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , says... "We congratulate our Russian colleagues on Sunday's successful launch of ISS Progress 45, and the spacecraft is on its way to the International Space Station. Pending the outcome of a series of flight readiness meetings in the coming weeks, this successful flight sets the stage for the next Soyuz launch, planned for mid-November. The December Soyuz mission will restore the space station crew size to six and continue normal crew rotations." Sounds like the Russians have the Soyuz launch vehicle up and running again. Unless SpaceX had some desire to play "schedule chicken" with the Russians restarting Soyuz, I suspect Elon Musk is about as pleased as anyone concerning this recent development. A depopulated ISS would have meant no Dragon COTS Flight 2/3 (merged). rick jones -- web2.0 n, the dot.com reunion tour... these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
NASA Statement on Success of Russian Progress Launch
On 10/31/2011 04:45 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
Jeff wrote: In , says... "We congratulate our Russian colleagues on Sunday's successful launch of ISS Progress 45, and the spacecraft is on its way to the International Space Station. Pending the outcome of a series of flight readiness meetings in the coming weeks, this successful flight sets the stage for the next Soyuz launch, planned for mid-November. The December Soyuz mission will restore the space station crew size to six and continue normal crew rotations." Sounds like the Russians have the Soyuz launch vehicle up and running again. Unless SpaceX had some desire to play "schedule chicken" with the Russians restarting Soyuz, I suspect Elon Musk is about as pleased as anyone concerning this recent development. A depopulated ISS would have meant no Dragon COTS Flight 2/3 (merged). There would have been *no* flight, merged or not. Crew commanding was an objective of COTS Demo 2. Flying COTS 2 would have meant wasting a spacecraft, since COTS 2 would have been considered incomplete without the crew commanding objective. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
NASA Statement on Success of Russian Progress Launch
Jorge R. Frank wrote:
On 10/31/2011 04:45 PM, Rick Jones wrote: Unless SpaceX had some desire to play "schedule chicken" with the Russians restarting Soyuz, I suspect Elon Musk is about as pleased as anyone concerning this recent development. A depopulated ISS would have meant no Dragon COTS Flight 2/3 (merged). There would have been *no* flight, merged or not. Crew commanding was an objective of COTS Demo 2. Flying COTS 2 would have meant wasting a spacecraft, since COTS 2 would have been considered incomplete without the crew commanding objective. Even greater happiness and joy at SpaceX then I guess rick jones -- Process shall set you free from the need for rational thought. these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Progress 15 Undocks From Station; Progress 16 to Launch Thursday | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 23rd 04 02:28 PM |
Progress 15 Undocks From Station; Progress 16 to Launch Thursday | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | December 23rd 04 02:28 PM |
NASA's year of sorrow, recovery, progress and success | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 31st 03 07:28 PM |
NASA's year of sorrow, recovery, progress and success | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 31st 03 07:28 PM |