A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Astro Pictures
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Open Cluster BERKELEY 43



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 9th 17, 06:05 PM
WA0CKY WA0CKY is offline
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Feb 2008
Posts: 689
Default Open Cluster BERKELEY 43

Berkeley 43 is one of the better Berkeley clusters. It is located in Aquila deep in the rift valley of the Milky Way. This means the cluster is rather highly reddened and dimmed by the dust. This also makes determining its age and distance rather difficult. WEBDA says it is 4400 light-years distant, reddened by 1.52 magnitudes and is 400 million years old.

Trying to find anything else on it I came across a paper entitled "Optical photometry and basic parameters of 10 unstudied open clusters." No wonder I wasn't finding much on it! This is a new paper published at the start of 2017. It leads off with this cluster and says it is 3400 light-years distant, reddened by 2.5 magnitudes and only 300 million years old. I find it interesting that the most significant digit in each of these measurements is one lower or dimmer than WEBDA's values. The paper can be found at https://arxiv.org/pdf/1001.3001.pdf

I tend to believe the paper's values as they are newer. Also, the cluster does appear severely reddened for the age of the stars, no matter whose age you go with. The star's colors seem more in line with an age of more than 5 billion years. Note the "hole" in the cluster's lower left side. The paper says this may be due to a dust cloud obscuring stars. I'd hoped an IR image of the cluster might answer this. I checked the 2MASS image and the hole is still there, but smaller and not as deep. In that image the cluster looks more "Y" shaped than round. I'm still not convinced a small dense cloud is to blame for the lack of stars there. Also, I'd expect the dim stars in the hole to be very reddened and except for one they are not.

I measure the brighter stars of the cluster at about 15th magnitude. It will take a pretty good scope to see it as more than a fuzzy patch of light I suspect.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	BERK43L4X10RGB2X10R.JPG
Views:	391
Size:	498.4 KB
ID:	6677  
  #2  
Old September 26th 17, 11:41 AM
slilge slilge is offline
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 151
Default

Rick,

this is really beautiful, especially considering that it is an "exotic" object.
I don't image open clusters often, but this one has such an interesting structure that it went on my list.
Will post an image with another Berkeley cluster later.

Stefan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Planetary Abell 59 and Open Cluster Berkeley 44 WA0CKY Astro Pictures 1 August 31st 17 11:21 PM
Berkeley 71 An Open Star Cluster WA0CKY Astro Pictures 1 March 14th 17 11:03 PM
Berkeley 29 An Old Open Cluster WA0CKY Astro Pictures 0 April 6th 16 07:08 AM
Classifying the Berkeley Open Clusters ukastronomy Astronomy Misc 0 December 26th 07 10:51 AM
Classifying the Berkeley Open Clusters ukastronomy Amateur Astronomy 0 December 26th 07 10:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.