|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Physics does not explain why astro bodies spin or rotate which points out the fakeness of Big Bang and General Relativity; the Atom Totality theory however does explain the origins of rotation
I posted to several newsgroups a few minutes ago, especially
sci.geo.geology since this topic started from a discussion over plate tectonics in geology. So let me repost the gist of this issue as to the *origin* of spin or rotation in astro bodies: --- quoting from a different thread --- I am going to have to start a new thread as to the question of the origins of rotation or spin in astro bodies. This is a topic which is critical and crucial to whether the Big Bang theory is true or false, as to whether General Relativity is true or false, and as to whether the Atom Totality theory replaces those two false theories. Both the Big Bang and General Relativity are deaf dumb and silent as to the origins of intrinsic spin or rotation. Linear Momentum of astro bodies are commonsense explained. But Angular Momentum and why astro bodies have spin and rotation is very much a profound question. General Relativity would lay the blame on gravity as the cause of Angular Momentum. The Atom Totality theory would lay the blame on the fact that every proton, every electron and every neutron has intrinsic spin and when mass is conglomerated into a astro body, the spin or rotation that results is a result of the total vector of every one of the elementary particles within that astro body, yielding a rotation or spin. In other words, the fact that Earth rotates or Mars or Asteroids or Comets or Stars rotate is fundamentally a result of the fact that electrons and protons and neutrons that compose those astro bodies have spin angular momentum. --- end quoting --- The main point I am addressing above is that we all can conceive and see in our minds eye how Linear Momentum can originate in physics and how Big Bang and General Relativity are okay with Linear Momentum. However, on the subject of Angular Momentum and the rotation and spin of all Astro Bodies in the Universe, that both Big Bang and General Relativity collapse into fakery. The Atom Totality theory however is comfortable with Angular Momentum, spin or rotation of astro bodies. Comfortable because in the Atom Totality theory, it is electricity and magnetism, not gravity that dictates what mass exists and how that mass moves in the universe. It is electricity and magnetism that creates all the mass we see and tells how that mass moves. So why does every astro body have a rotation spin? The answer is that every elementary particle such as electrons, protons, neutrons have *spin*. And when you conglomerate these elementary particles into a astro-body such as the planet Earth or a comet or asteroid or our Sun, then the vector sum of all those elementary particles confers a intrinsic Spin or Rotation or Angular Momentum over the entire astro body. P.S. Personal Note: for 13 years now of my Internet posts on science, it is a post such as this one that has scared me the most. The reason I say scared is that of all the science I have worked on and have accomplished, it is the simple and easiest and plain and simple in front of my eyes that I was scared have overlooking. Example: Archimedes of Ancient Greeks accomplished so much, but he failed to see a simple thing as the decimal system. How much greater would Archimedes accomplishments have been if he had not overlooked a way of writing numbers as decimal representation. Another Example: How much more simple would it have been for Darwin with his theory of Evolution to have incorporated genetics of Mendel. Instead, Darwin overlooked genetics. What I am saying is that the discovery of a new and true theory of science is often the case where the most obvious and plain facts are overlooked. Another Example is Special Relativity which was discovered by many people such as Poincare, Lorentz, Einstein. But the simple fact that a magnet through a wire yields current and a current through wire yields magnetism is the end result. So what scares me is to discover the Atom Totality theory and then overlook some of the most simple and obvious facts. And one such fact is that in the Atom Totality theory we explain Angular Momentum, but the Big Bang and General Relativity are deaf dumb and silent. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Who is Archimeded Plutonium?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes_Plutonium Archimedes Plutonium (born July 5, 1950) is primarily noted for his varied and eccentric contributions to Usenet. Plutonium repeatedly claimed to be the greatest living scientist, and referred to himself at least once as "The King of Science" [1], although he is almost universally regarded as a crank. One of Plutonium's earliest and most memorable posts in December, 1993 [2] replies to Andrew Wiles' report on the status of his proof of Fermat's last theorem. Background Since strong user authentication is rarely used on Usenet, some Usenet posters had suggested that Plutonium might have been a hoax or a practical joke. However, the claim that Plutonium is a real person is corroborated by a photograph and article about him in the Dartmouth College campus newspaper on November 11, 1991 [1]. Nevertheless, there is no assurance that all posts attributed to Plutonium on Usenet were by him. According to an autobiography he posted to Usenet in the 1990s, Plutonium was born with the name Ludwig Poehlmann in Arzberg, Germany. His family came to the United States in his youth, settling near Cincinnati, Ohio. Ludwig was adopted in his teens by a local real-estate investor named Willis Hansen, and his name was changed to Ludwig Hansen. His autobiography says that he received an undergraduate degree in mathematics from the University of Cincinnati and did some graduate work at a university in Utah, but headed off to Melbourne, Australia, to serve as a mathematics tutor in the early 1970s. He returned to the USA later in the 1970s, and, according to his autobiography, inherited his adoptive father's real-estate holdings, which he claimed to have parlayed into a large fortune through stock market investments in the 1980s. His autobiography also stated that he spent some time in the United States Navy during the 1980s. At some point after his adoptive father's death, he changed his name to Ludwig van Ludvig, under which he may have first posted to Usenet at the start of the 1990s. Plutonium was long observed on the campus of Dartmouth College, where he rode around on a bicycle and wore an orange hunting hat and a homemade cape decorated with atomic symbols in magic marker. Students frequently saw him using the computer cluster in the basement of the Kiewit Computation Center, and he regularly published full-page advertisements of his claims in the student newspaper, The Dartmouth [3]. Plutonium worked as a "potwasher" (he preferred this term over "dishwasher" because it had the same starting letter and number of letters as plutonium) at the Hanover Inn, which the college owns. When asked on Usenet how this observed job jibed with his claims of wealth, Plutonium explained that he only took the job to get Internet access. In 1999 Plutonium posted various complaints about the management of Dartmouth, calling for a strike by workers there and suggesting various conspiracy theories concerning college administrators [4]. Plutonium lost his job at Dartmouth about August 1999. After making what he termed "science odyssey tours" of the United States and Europe, Plutonium then moved to rural Meckling, South Dakota, where he resumed his Usenet posting, saying he now lives on a "homestead" apparently consisting of a house, two Airstream trailers, and a grove of various sorts of trees. Plutonium's claims In late 1990, Plutonium claimed to have had the realization of his Plutonium Atom Totality Theory, which he claimed to be one of the most important breakthroughs in scientific history. According to this theory, the Universe is a giant plutonium atom, and the part of the Universe we are able to observe from Earth, including Earth itself, is somewhere in its outer electron shells. He then changed his name to Ludwig Plutonium. In autumn 1994 he claimed to have realized that he was the reincarnation of the great early Greek scientist Archimedes, and so once again changed his name to Archimedes Plutonium. Biographical notes In his autobiography (entitled at one point Ludwig Plutonium: the Chosen One, and claimed to be 2200 pages), Plutonium claims he started posting to Usenet on August 12 of 1993 under the name of Ludwig Plutonium. He posts and cross-posts to a wide variety of groups on Usenet, especially in the sci. (science) hierarchy. He is also known for posting about his favorite types of fruit and candy to unrelated science newsgroups [5]. On other occasions he is believed to have rather ineptly attempted to forge posts under the names of those who contradicted his claims. Plutonium sometimes claimed on Usenet to be independently wealthy from his investments, and on occasion he would post about his stock investment strategies. Archimedes Plutonium is often nicknamed "Arky", "Archy", "Archie", "Archy Pu", or "Archie-Poo" by others on the internet. His exploits are followed religiously and commented on with a mixture of mockery and amazement on the newsgroup alt.religion.kibology. Quotes a.. "Calm down, man, this is only the Internet, this isn't Vietnam, go play some par golf or tennis set" [6] b.. "When an electron is collapsed, i.e., under observation then the electron transforms into a ball, a particle, and not the dots which go to making-up of the particle." Quote explaining collapse of the wavefunction from Plutonium's treatise [7 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Physics does not explain why astro bodies spin or rotate which points out the fakeness of Big Bang and General Relativity; the Atom Totality theory however does explain the origins of rotation
a_plutonium wrote: I posted to several newsgroups a few minutes ago, especially sci.geo.geology since this topic started from a discussion over plate tectonics in geology. So let me repost the gist of this issue as to the *origin* of spin or rotation in astro bodies: --- quoting from a different thread --- I am going to have to start a new thread as to the question of the origins of rotation or spin in astro bodies. This is a topic which is critical and crucial to whether the Big Bang theory is true or false, as to whether General Relativity is true or false, and as to whether the Atom Totality theory replaces those two false theories. Both the Big Bang and General Relativity are deaf dumb and silent as to the origins of intrinsic spin or rotation. Linear Momentum of astro bodies are commonsense explained. But Angular Momentum and why astro bodies have spin and rotation is very much a profound question. General Relativity would lay the blame on gravity as the cause of Angular Momentum. The Atom Totality theory would lay the blame on the fact that every proton, every electron and every neutron has intrinsic spin and when mass is conglomerated into a astro body, the spin or rotation that results is a result of the total vector of every one of the elementary particles within that astro body, yielding a rotation or spin. In other words, the fact that Earth rotates or Mars or Asteroids or Comets or Stars rotate is fundamentally a result of the fact that electrons and protons and neutrons that compose those astro bodies have spin angular momentum. --- end quoting --- The main point I am addressing above is that we all can conceive and see in our minds eye how Linear Momentum can originate in physics and how Big Bang and General Relativity are okay with Linear Momentum. However, on the subject of Angular Momentum and the rotation and spin of all Astro Bodies in the Universe, that both Big Bang and General Relativity collapse into fakery. The Atom Totality theory however is comfortable with Angular Momentum, spin or rotation of astro bodies. Comfortable because in the Atom Totality theory, it is electricity and magnetism, not gravity that dictates what mass exists and how that mass moves in the universe. It is electricity and magnetism that creates all the mass we see and tells how that mass moves. So why does every astro body have a rotation spin? The answer is that every elementary particle such as electrons, protons, neutrons have *spin*. And when you conglomerate these elementary particles into a astro-body such as the planet Earth or a comet or asteroid or our Sun, then the vector sum of all those elementary particles confers a intrinsic Spin or Rotation or Angular Momentum over the entire astro body. P.S. Personal Note: for 13 years now of my Internet posts on science, it is a post such as this one that has scared me the most. The reason I say scared is that of all the science I have worked on and have accomplished, it is the simple and easiest and plain and simple in front of my eyes that I was scared have overlooking. Example: Archimedes of Ancient Greeks accomplished so much, but he failed to see a simple thing as the decimal system. How much greater would Archimedes accomplishments have been if he had not overlooked a way of writing numbers as decimal representation. Another Example: How much more simple would it have been for Darwin with his theory of Evolution to have incorporated genetics of Mendel. Instead, Darwin overlooked genetics. What I am saying is that the discovery of a new and true theory of science is often the case where the most obvious and plain facts are overlooked. Another Example is Special Relativity which was discovered by many people such as Poincare, Lorentz, Einstein. But the simple fact that a magnet through a wire yields current and a current through wire yields magnetism is the end result. So what scares me is to discover the Atom Totality theory and then overlook some of the most simple and obvious facts. And one such fact is that in the Atom Totality theory we explain Angular Momentum, but the Big Bang and General Relativity are deaf dumb and silent. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies "Physics does not explain why astro bodies spin or rotate ".......???? Wrong, it does! LL |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Who is Archimeded Plutonium?
My theory of Plutonium: He's a troll. Nobody that tech. literate could possibly be that wrong. MadDogs Principle: "The volume of troll **** produced is directly proportional to the volume of response offered to the troll." So why am I posting this???????, Because he is kinda funny. MadDog |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
neutrinos may hold the mechanism Physics does not explain why astro bodies spin or rotate which points out the fakeness of Big Bang and General Relativity; the Atom Totality theory however does explain the origins of rotation
So let us have some plain talk about Big Bang, General Relativity and
Atom Totality theories as it relates to one of the basic motions of the Cosmos-- that of spin, rotation and angular momentum. Both the Big Bang and General Relativity are fine and dandy and okay when it comes to Linear Momentum because both of those theories are grounded and grown from Linear Momentum. The Big Bang is a linear momentum cannon so to speak, unless you want to rifle the barrel of the cannon in order to lend some spin to the projectile. An explosion is a linear momentum event. Explosions do not involve Angular Momentum. So the Big Bang is deaf, dumb and silent as to how Angular Momentum becomes established. And why every astro body from that of a galaxy on down to a comet has Angular Momentum. General Relativity would say this widespread Angular Momentum occurs due to gravity that as a planet grows from the Nebular Dust Cloud theory or as a star grows from a Galactic Dust Cloud that the accretion process of growth begins the spinning or rotation of the growing of the new planet or new star. The accretion in towards the center of the planet or star or galaxy stars a rotation motion. Trouble with this is, is that Angular Momentum is more widespread than that of Dust Cloud Coalescence. And that the spin of planets from dust cloud coalescence would be strictly a math relationship of size of astro body with rotation and that is not what is observed in our own solar system. General Relativity is a theory based on Linear Momentum in the first place and is very much lost and out of place with Angular Momentum. Mass bends space and follows the curvature of that bent space is very much solely confined to Linear Momentum and out of place with Angular Momentum. The Atom Totality theory begins the discussion of Angular Momentum by noting that every proton, electron, neutron has an intrinsic spin and so every astro body is a vector sum of its elementary particles Angular Momentum. So it is not a question of where does Angular Momentum arise in an astro body, but a question of the vector sum of the elementary particles spin translates into the spin rotation of the astro body. But I am not trouble free in explaining why two almost identical stars or two almost identical planets would have vastly different rotations or spin angular momentum. There are some stars formed after a supernova which ended up with vastly different spin rotations. Somehow, there is a mechanism for which I am not privy to at this moment in time. Some mechanism for which the distance of a planet to its star system that gives rise to its actual spin or rotation. Something about electricity and magnetism that determines angular momentum. Something like the Titius Bode spacings of planets that determines revolution distance but also characterizes spin angular momentum. Because, as I have characterized the above, planet Earth could be spinning so wildly that it would not hold together. For there is a range of possible rotation speeds. That if every elementary particle of Earth of electrons protons and neutrons were so aligned in their spin that the vector sum of those spins would be a Angular Momentum that the gravity of Earth could not hold together this planet and it would fly apart. This is the mechanism I am unclear about. And we have signs of this mechanism on a cosmic scale for we notice many old remnant stars of supernova explosions that have enormous spin angular momentum. Some astronomers have even called for microsecond spins but I doubt the veracity of such reports. Those stars did not get that spin from the supernova explosion because that event is a Linear Momentum event. So how did they thence acquire the huge Angular Momentum. I maybe very much premature with a guess as to the mechanism. But guess I will. And I sense a mechanism with that of neutrinos. Neutrinos in the Universe are so abundant that we could call them in physics as the "fabric of space itself, or table on which the rest of physics is worked out". Give me a new planet or star and place them on the "table of physics" of this constant bath of neutrinos that coarses through every mass and those neutrinos would somehow determine the vector sum for the spin angular momentum. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
neutrinos may hold the mechanism Physics does not explainwhy astro bodies spin or rotate which points out the fakeness of Big Bangand General Relativity; the Atom Totality theory however does explain theorigins of rotation
a_plutonium wrote:
I still remember you from when I was a student. Surely this was before dejanews? Why don't you get on with your life too? Lots of Greetings! Volker |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
a little known fact that was never appreciated in Physics until now neutrinos may hold the mechanism Physics does not explain why astro bodies spin or rotate which points out the fakeness of Big Bang and General Relativity; the Atom Totality
Now let me talk for just a moment about the overall big picture of
physics today as it relates to that of Linear Momentum and Angular Momentum. Momentum, we can all agree are two main pillars of all of physics. Removing momentum, either linear or angular is like removing the foundation of a building without disturbing the building. The trouble though, with modern day physics and astronomy is that it almost totally ignores Angular Momentum on the large scale. On the microscopic scale, the angular momentum is very much important and accounted for. On the large scale, we see astro bodies rotate and spin on axis but we have never payed attention to what causes this spin. We have never really asked why does the planets and comets and asteroids all have different spins and stars vary drastically? Modern day physics is really in a mess when it concerns momentum. For the theory of the Big Bang with its ally of General Relativity never really focuses on why such a varied Angular Momentum of astro bodies. It is as if to these two theories, that only Linear Momentum has any value and that Angular Momentum is of little to no importance. But the Atom Totality theory is very much more different for it places greatest emphasis on Angular Momentum. Think about it for a second. If the galaxies and stars are all pieces of the last 6 electrons of 231Pu, then all momentum is angular momentum. And whenever we think we see linear-momentum, we simply have not streched the path of motion to a large enough distance. Inside an atom, every motion, is arguably angular momentum. Perhaps the only linear momentum motion inside an atom is that of radioactivity emission. On the other hand, comparing the Big Bang allied with General Relativity, every motion arguably in these theories is Linear Momentum with few if any Angular Momentum to account for. Now, here again enters another great clue from Experimental Physics of the 20th century. The John Bell with Alain Aspect Experiment that decides whether Quantum Mechanics is on the large scale as well as the small scale. And we all know the result. And John Bell went to its final logical conclusion of that of SUPERDETERMINISM. So if we add Superdeterminism to this discussion, then we are led to a very remarkable end point. Can you have Superdeterminism in our Cosmos, our Universe, and yet allow for every electron, every proton and every neutron to align itself inside of astro bodies-- randomly? If you accept Superdeterminism, then the alignment and vector sum of every elementary particle of its spin angular momentum must be so aligned as to give the rotation spin of that astro body that we currently observe. Amazing Coincidence: To most people reading this post would find it merely a amazing coincidence that Electromagnetic spectrum if we include Neutrinos can penetrate every elementary particle in the Cosmos. Most people find that fact as merely a coincidence. But to those that believe and understand Superdeterminism do not find it a coincidence but a necessity to have Superdeterminism. That the Cosmos is so built, so rigged that every particle has easy access via EM radiation plus Neutrinos. So that every Elementary Particle in this Universe of ours is being "ordered" to align its spin in a very special and specific direction. Every electron, proton, neutron that makes up planet Earth is being "ordered" and demanded by the Nucleus of the Atom Totality to have a vector sum spin of 24 hours (or thereabouts) spin angular momentum. The Big Bang with its ally of General Relativity, find this fact that the universe has radiation that is in constant steady communication with every Elementary Particle as merely just a "amazing fact". But neither of these two theories ever attempted to explain why the planets and stars and galaxies spin in the manner they spin. Never explained how Angular Momentum originates in astro bodies. And the reason is well understood because both of these theories are based on Linear Momentum. And deaf, dumb and silent when it comes to Angular Momentum. So the little known fact in the title of this post is worthy of repeating. Why is it that in physics, we have the EM spectrum of radiation that is able to instantly communicate with most Elementary Particles that make up astro bodies, but when we include Neutrinos into the "spectrum of communication in order to execute Superdeterminism" that we include every Elementary Particle in the Cosmos. If Superdeterminism is true, then we have to have a full spectrum of communication. If Superdeterminism was false, then we do not need EM + Neutrinos. Because this spectrum is full is not a proof that Superdeterminism true, but it is evidence that Big Bang and General Relativity are false theories. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
how and why each astro body has the spin rotation that it has
a_plutonium wrote: (everything else snipped except this paragraph) Amazing Coincidence: To most people reading this post would find it merely a amazing coincidence that Electromagnetic spectrum if we include Neutrinos can penetrate every elementary particle in the Cosmos. Most people find that fact as merely a coincidence. But to those that believe and understand Superdeterminism do not find it a coincidence but a necessity to have Superdeterminism. That the Cosmos is so built, so rigged that every particle has easy access via EM radiation plus Neutrinos. So that every Elementary Particle in this Universe of ours is being "ordered" to align its spin in a very special and specific direction. Every electron, proton, neutron that makes up planet Earth is being "ordered" and demanded by the Nucleus of the Atom Totality to have a vector sum spin of 24 hours (or thereabouts) spin angular momentum. I feel I should make it directly clear as to how and why the galaxies, stars, Sun, Jupiter, Earth, comets, asteroids, etc etc have the spin angular momentum that they have. I should make it clear and state it directly how spin angular momentum such as the Earth rotating in 24 hours on its axis, how that came about. All astro bodies are composed of Elementary Particles of electrons and protons and neutrons. Elementary Particles all have a *spin*. This spin is angular-momentum. All astro bodies are a vector sum of the spin of every one of its elementary particles that forms the rotation of that astro body. Important Fact never before spoken of in physics: The important fact is that the rotation of an astro body such as Earth rotating 24 hours on its axis is due to the fact of the alignment of all the elementary particles within Earth that yields that specific spin rotation. So here we have the idea that the spin inside the particles that compose the larger body causes the spin of the larger body. This is like the mantra of the Atom Totality itself. That the Universe is one big atom for which it is composed totally of nothing but smaller atoms. So the mantra transfers over to momentum. That the momentum of a bigger body is caused by the vector sum of the elementary particles composing it. So the only other thing that needs to be worked out is what communication exists in the Universe that tells, dictates and orders each elementary particle inside of Earth to line up in such a way as to yield a 24 hour rotation spin. And the answer is that the EM spectrum plus Neutrinos are in constant communication with every elementary particle inside of Earth "ordering them to line up in a specific manner". Summary: I needed to directly state the idea or principle that a large astro body angular momentum is a vector sum of its Elementary Particles composing it of their spin angular momentum. And that the communication of the Nucleus of the Atom Totality via EM and Neutrinos tells each elementary particle how to line up. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
an observation that would be instant proof of the claim that Earth's rotation is due to spin angular momentum of Elementary Particles
An instant proof of the claims of this thread-- that the rotation of
planets, stars and galaxies are mostly due to the spin angular momentum of the Elementary Particles that compose those astro bodies. But here is a instant proof. We take a rocket or spacecraft and launch it. Once the fuel is depleted the spacecraft is left wandering space. It had no spin angular momentum the moment it was launched to the moment it used up all of its fuel. We observe the spacecraft years later and we find it, rather miraculously with a spin angular momentum. Curiously we ask why and how did it acquire such? Well, according to this thread, all mass objects are composed of Elementary Particles which have intrinsic spin angular momentum and when in space those particles begin to line up their spin angular momentum and cause a "rotation" in the object. So, curiously, has anyone noticed a spin angular momentum from any of our spacecraft abandoned in space? Now I did some looking up of rotation periods for the Sun and the planets and the Sun is approx 25 days. Mercury is 58 days; Venus 224 days reverse; Mars 1.03 days; Jupiter 0.4 days; Saturn 0.4 days; Uranus 0.4 days reverse; Neptune 0.6 days. Again, I want to emphasize, that if rotation is caused by Nebular Dust Cloud coalescence of matter and where gravity causes the spin rotation, then that data statistic should be a linear relationship. But instead it is too random. Especially the fact that Venus and Uranus are reverse spins relative to the others. So this tells us that the Nebular Dust Cloud theory of planet origins is probably another one of those fake theories. The highest spin angular momentum in our solar system is Jupiter; indicating that Jupiter is growing mass via Cosmic rays (Dirac's new radioactivity accretion) Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Moon rotation should be near 0 not 27 days an observation that would be instant proof of the claim that Earth's rotation is due to spin angular momentum of Elementary Particles
a_plutonium wrote: (snipped) Now I did some looking up of rotation periods for the Sun and the planets and the Sun is approx 25 days. Mercury is 58 days; Venus 224 days reverse; Mars 1.03 days; Jupiter 0.4 days; Saturn 0.4 days; Uranus 0.4 days reverse; Neptune 0.6 days. Now the Moon rotates in approx 27 days and is the slowest rotator except for the satellite Iapetus of Saturn of 79 days. What do I make of this? Well, considering that the Moon collided with Earth some 4 billion years ago, I would think that all of its spin rotation would have been lost or transferred into linear momentum by the impact and that the Moon should not have any spin now according to present day physics and what is taught in present day astronomy. So the Moon according to present day physics and astronomy attitudes would be a nonrotating entity, having lost its ability to spin rotate because of the collision. Now why does Iapetus have such a slower rotation? Was it also a collision casualty of long ago? But why the Moon even has a 27 day rotation would be explained by me as a result of the total mass of the Moon in communication with the Nucleus of the Atom Totality that the streams of neutrinos that course through the Moon each and every second, and ordering or superdetermining the alignment of each and every Elementary Particle within the Moon (its protons, electrons and neutrons) to orient each such particle so the end result is that the spin rotation of the Moon is 27 days and likewise for Earth that it ends up as 1 day (or 24 hours). In this viewpoint, Angular Momentum is the bulk Momentum of the Universe and where Linear Momentum is rare. Linear Momentum occurs where radioactivity takes place for the particle that emanated due to radioactive decay is emitted with Linear Momentum. In physics and astronomy before the Atom Totality theory, was based on Linear Momentum for the Big Bang and General Relativity is all based on Linear Momentum. But the Universe is all about rotation-- rotation of planets and stars and galaxies. And revolution is merely another form of rotation. So, has anyone observed any one of our abandoned spacecrafts that we sent on some long ago mission which had only Linear Momentum during its useful-life and which surprizingly is now rotate-spinning? You see, the explanation for why this old lost spacecraft is now rotating-spinning on some axis is because the Nucleus of the Atom Totality is sending neutrinos through this old antique (can I call it an antique spacecraft) and those neutrinos are telling each elementary particle of the spacecraft how to align its spin angular momentum and thus producing a rotating antique spacecraft. So, has anyone observed such a case? For the Moon should have next to 0 rotation but it has a huge 27 day rotation. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Gravitational Instability Theory on the Formation of the Universe | Br Dan Izzo | Policy | 6 | September 7th 04 09:29 PM |
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 04 02:35 AM |