|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
red wine and relativity
On 3 Aug, 03:18, Tom Roberts wrote:
Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: http://www.physics.utah.edu/~mohit/quarks.jpg Great cartoon! An instant hit on my cube wall at Fermilab. Tom Roberts The greatest ever Fermilab hit (no red wine at all): http://www.iit.edu/~bcps/database/se...culty_web_page http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...4dc146100e32c? Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of applicability would be reduced)." Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
red wine and relativity
On 3 AUG, 08:32, Sam Wormley wrote:
Pentcho Valev wrote: On 3 Aug, 03:18, Tom Roberts wrote: Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: http://www.physics.utah.edu/~mohit/quarks.jpg Great cartoon! An instant hit on my cube wall at Fermilab. Tom Roberts The greatest ever Fermilab hit (no red wine at all): http://www.iit.edu/~bcps/database/se...culty_web_page http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...4dc146100e32c? Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of applicability would be reduced)." Pentcho Valev We are fortunate that Tom Roberts take some time to post on sci.physics. Thank you, Tom Master Tom Roberts wants you to THINK, Wormley, not just thank him. So far he has only loved zombies who just thank him and sing "Divine Einstein" but from now on he will love zombies who THINK as well. For unknown reasons. So Master Tom Roberts has two suprises for you: http://www.iit.edu/~robertst/Colloquium_Apr_27.ppt Master Tom Roberts: "A deeper look at some experiments that appear to refute SR Group velocity c (in anomalously dispersive media) Visibly superluminal astronomical sources Michelson and Morley (!) Dayton Miller's heroic repetition of the MMX A surprise: the aether is not dead, it is just irrelevant" Wormley Wormley Master Tom Roberts wants you to explain: (1) why the Michelson-Morley experiment appears to refute special relativity; (2) what "the aether is not dead, it is just irrelevant" mean. Pentcho Valev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
red wine and relativity
On Aug 2, 10:18 pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
[...] Be quiet. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
red wine and relativity
On Aug 3, 1:18 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On 3 AUG, 08:32, Sam Wormley wrote: Pentcho Valev wrote: On 3 Aug, 03:18, Tom Roberts wrote: Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: http://www.physics.utah.edu/~mohit/quarks.jpg Great cartoon! An instant hit on my cube wall at Fermilab. Tom Roberts The greatest ever Fermilab hit (no red wine at all): http://www.iit.edu/~bcps/database/se...owse_frm/threa... Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of applicability would be reduced)." Pentcho Valev We are fortunate that Tom Roberts take some time to post on sci.physics. Thank you, Tom Master Tom Roberts wants you to THINK, Wormley, not just thank him. So far he has only loved zombies who just thank him and sing "Divine Einstein" but from now on he will love zombies who THINK as well. For unknown reasons. So Master Tom Roberts has two suprises for you: http://www.iit.edu/~robertst/Colloquium_Apr_27.ppt Master Tom Roberts: "A deeper look at some experiments that appear to refute SR Group velocity c (in anomalously dispersive media) Visibly superluminal astronomical sources Michelson and Morley (!) Dayton Miller's heroic repetition of the MMX A surprise: the aether is not dead, it is just irrelevant" Wormley Wormley Master Tom Roberts wants you to explain: (1) why the Michelson-Morley experiment appears to refute special relativity; You might want to consider looking at the "deeper look" in Tom's talk rather than just referring to a title slide or an abstract. Are you lazy? (2) what "the aether is not dead, it is just irrelevant" mean. Pentcho Valev |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
red wine and relativity
On 3 Aug, 15:52, PD wrote:
On Aug 3, 1:18 am, Pentcho Valev wrote: On 3 AUG, 08:32, Sam Wormley wrote: Pentcho Valev wrote: On 3 Aug, 03:18, Tom Roberts wrote: Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: http://www.physics.utah.edu/~mohit/quarks.jpg Great cartoon! An instant hit on my cube wall at Fermilab. Tom Roberts The greatest ever Fermilab hit (no red wine at all): http://www.iit.edu/~bcps/database/se...Physics/Physic...... Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of applicability would be reduced)." Pentcho Valev We are fortunate that Tom Roberts take some time to post on sci.physics. Thank you, Tom Master Tom Roberts wants you to THINK, Wormley, not just thank him. So far he has only loved zombies who just thank him and sing "Divine Einstein" but from now on he will love zombies who THINK as well. For unknown reasons. So Master Tom Roberts has two suprises for you: http://www.iit.edu/~robertst/Colloquium_Apr_27.ppt Master Tom Roberts: "A deeper look at some experiments that appear to refute SR Group velocity c (in anomalously dispersive media) Visibly superluminal astronomical sources Michelson and Morley (!) Dayton Miller's heroic repetition of the MMX A surprise: the aether is not dead, it is just irrelevant" Wormley Wormley Master Tom Roberts wants you to explain: (1) why the Michelson-Morley experiment appears to refute special relativity; You might want to consider looking at the "deeper look" in Tom's talk rather than just referring to a title slide or an abstract. Are you lazy? I am. Did YOU have a deeper look? Did you find in Master Tom Roberts' soul anything cleverer than this: http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...4dc146100e32c? Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of applicability would be reduced)." Pentcho Valev |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
red wine and relativity
On Aug 3, 11:37 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On 3 Aug, 15:52, PD wrote: On Aug 3, 1:18 am, Pentcho Valev wrote: On 3 AUG, 08:32, Sam Wormley wrote: Pentcho Valev wrote: On 3 Aug, 03:18, Tom Roberts wrote: Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: http://www.physics.utah.edu/~mohit/quarks.jpg Great cartoon! An instant hit on my cube wall at Fermilab. Tom Roberts The greatest ever Fermilab hit (no red wine at all): http://www.iit.edu/~bcps/database/se...Physics/Physic...... Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of applicability would be reduced)." Pentcho Valev We are fortunate that Tom Roberts take some time to post on sci.physics. Thank you, Tom Master Tom Roberts wants you to THINK, Wormley, not just thank him. So far he has only loved zombies who just thank him and sing "Divine Einstein" but from now on he will love zombies who THINK as well. For unknown reasons. So Master Tom Roberts has two suprises for you: http://www.iit.edu/~robertst/Colloquium_Apr_27.ppt Master Tom Roberts: "A deeper look at some experiments that appear to refute SR Group velocity c (in anomalously dispersive media) Visibly superluminal astronomical sources Michelson and Morley (!) Dayton Miller's heroic repetition of the MMX A surprise: the aether is not dead, it is just irrelevant" Wormley Wormley Master Tom Roberts wants you to explain: (1) why the Michelson-Morley experiment appears to refute special relativity; You might want to consider looking at the "deeper look" in Tom's talk rather than just referring to a title slide or an abstract. Are you lazy? I am. Did YOU have a deeper look? Did you find in Master Tom Roberts' soul anything cleverer than this: http://groups.google.ca/group/sci.ph...owse_frm/threa... Tom Roberts: "If it is ultimately discovered that the photon has a nonzero mass (i.e. light in vacuum does not travel at the invariant speed of the Lorentz transform), SR would be unaffected but both Maxwell's equations and QED would be refuted (or rather, their domains of applicability would be reduced)." I don't know how clever it is. It is right, though. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
DO RELATIVITY ZOMBIES UNDERSTAND RELATIVITY HYPNOTISTS? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 12 | June 5th 07 12:14 AM |
Ancient Wine Turns Up | Double-A | Misc | 5 | May 25th 05 01:22 PM |
Improving wine with satellites | Jacques van Oene | News | 0 | September 17th 04 04:12 PM |
Relativity | entity | Misc | 10 | August 19th 04 11:37 AM |
4-D in Relativity (was Moi) | G EddieA95 | Science | 0 | November 11th 03 07:00 AM |