A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Corruption



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 9th 07, 02:45 AM posted to sci.astro
[email protected][_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 327
Default Corruption

Hubble already produced a sharp image in deep space of a region 400-800
million
lightyears after the big bang. The deep space picture was the size in
space 1/10th
the diameter of the Moon. What would it take to just zoom a little
further and
get a foggy picture? Just a slight zoom into a dark region within the
dark field
should bring up galaxies that are passed the age of the Universe. It is
pretty
certain that what Hubble would find is galaxies upon galaxies, meaning
that the Universe is a lot older than currently believed.

Also, you are stupid.

  #3  
Old January 9th 07, 02:49 AM posted to sci.astro
[email protected][_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 327
Default Corruption

Hubble already produced a sharp image in deep space of a region 400-800
million
lightyears after the big bang. The deep space picture was the size in
space 1/10th
the diameter of the Moon. What would it take to just zoom a little
further and
get a foggy picture? Just a slight zoom into a dark region within the
dark field
should bring up galaxies that are passed the age of the Universe. It is
pretty
certain that what Hubble would find is galaxies upon galaxies, meaning
that the Universe is a lot older than currently believed.

Also, you are stupid.


Its a mainstream phenomena to not zoom past the big bang.

Oh, and the Hubble was decided to be unfunded by higher sources
and in 2008 crashed into ocean. By higher sources.

  #4  
Old January 9th 07, 02:50 AM posted to sci.astro
[email protected][_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 327
Default Corruption

Also, you are stupid.

Yes, you are.


You are monster netter picker. A religious extremist.

  #5  
Old January 9th 07, 02:58 AM posted to sci.astro
[email protected][_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 327
Default Corruption

Also, you are stupid.

Yes, you are.


You are monster netter picker. A religious extremist.


If you don't like it here go back to your own country.

  #6  
Old January 9th 07, 03:03 AM posted to sci.astro
[email protected][_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 327
Default Corruption

Also, you are stupid.

Yes, you are.


You are monster netter picker. A religious extremist.


If you don't like it here go back to your own country.


This is deep space. This is deep space. No zooming to this zone allowed
by ideas. Ideas presented to our generation.

Let's get this clear. We don't have two worlds, one that is 13.7
billion lightyears
accross, and then black. This world is over 20 billion lightyears.

It means, that for gasses to disappear from space, to organize into
elliptic galaxies, to transform into spiral galaxies, to compact,
the initial process is at least half the time, meaning the Universe
is roughly twice that old. The correct estimate is between 18 and
25 billion years.

Go home.

  #7  
Old January 9th 07, 03:14 AM posted to sci.astro
[email protected][_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 327
Default Corruption

Also, you are stupid.

Yes, you are.

You are monster netter picker. A religious extremist.


If you don't like it here go back to your own country.


This is deep space. This is deep space. No zooming to this zone allowed
by ideas. Ideas presented to our generation.

Let's get this clear. We don't have two worlds, one that is 13.7
billion lightyears
accross, and then black. This world is over 20 billion lightyears.

It means, that for gasses to disappear from space, to organize into
elliptic galaxies, to transform into spiral galaxies, to compact,
the initial process is at least half the time, meaning the Universe
is roughly twice that old. The correct estimate is between 18 and
25 billion years.

Go home.


Although our galaxy is 13.4 billion years old based on the age of
the Suns, and the Universe is 13.7 billion years old, the problem
is that it takes very long time for first the formation of elliptic
galaxies, then the transformation into spiral galaxies, and looking
at the deep space picture, one finds spirals upon spirals just
400-800 million years after the big bang. There is a very slow
process of formation with galaxies 100000 lightyears accross.

Imagine this slowness. Suns don't just jump into place.

Gasses weren't just spiraling, first gas filled space. Then
Suns were born. Then a disk was born that organized all
mass on a spiral. You just take a miniascule event, like the
collision of the Milky Way galaxy with the Andromeda galaxy,
and the tails are already connecting between these two
galaxies, and this collision lasts 3 billion years. You forget the
whole Universe. And see this tiny event that happened here.
Then you realize that you can use your own eyes like Hubble
and pick an area on the sky that is 1/10th the diameter of the
Moon. That area was clear in the sky, and what was found there
was 10000 galaxies at 13 billion lightyears away. Is it too hard
to zoom further, just a little more, we would arrive to 14 billion
lightyears away. You take half that, 1/20th of the Moon's
diameter, and you see twice as far by producing the same
size image. You may find galaxies up to 26 billion lightyears
away. But technology stopped here. Because? Of someone
at the top?



Things don

  #8  
Old January 9th 07, 03:15 AM posted to sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 58
Default Corruption


Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:


Also, you are stupid.


Yes, you are.

But you are by far the most stupit, Gay Duck!

Art Deco

  #9  
Old January 9th 07, 03:45 AM posted to sci.astro
[email protected][_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 327
Default Corruption

Hubble already produced a sharp image in deep space of a region 400-800
million
lightyears after the big bang. The deep space picture was the size in
space 1/10th
the diameter of the Moon. What would it take to just zoom a little
further and
get a foggy picture? Just a slight zoom into a dark region within the
dark field
should bring up galaxies that are passed the age of the Universe. It is
pretty
certain that what Hubble would find is galaxies upon galaxies, meaning
that the Universe is a lot older than currently believed.

Also, you are stupid.


Its a mainstream phenomena to not zoom past the big bang.

Oh, and the Hubble was decided to be unfunded by higher sources
and in 2008 crashed into ocean. By higher sources.


And astronomers denounced Pluto as a planet even though its
round and orbits the Sun, and it looks like a planet. They say the
sky is green based on criteria.

When you put numbers above facts that 11 year old can see as
wrong, then what happens is that the politbeauro runs the ideal
society, and become brutal like Catholics did when they hung
people because they proved that the Earth was round, and we
are stuck in this kind of mentalities that by government, the
Hubble cannot release certain things without approval by higher
sources. And people become vicious, and want to see blood,
of those scientists (I am a computer scientist, I am a scientist),
who say otherwise, and they must be by instinct be perceived
as the enemies of God, society and community of Jesus Christ
and his "led" followers. It was the Pope who discussed with
top scientists the idea of a big bang, and the Pope approved
that the big bang is compatible with the idea of God. Without
his approval, there would be global conflict, and thus the world
was allowed to believe in a big bang.

Just look further. And we shall see what Galileo saw, a new
future, one that is provoking, but not just for the provokers.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASA Corruption at the Highest Levels kT History 74 November 4th 08 06:21 PM
NASA Corruption at the Highest Levels kT Policy 29 October 26th 08 01:13 AM
The Corruption of SETI is OFFICIAL. Anonymous SETI 5 August 27th 06 08:36 PM
The Corruption of SETI is OFFICIAL. Anonymous Astronomy Misc 1 August 1st 06 10:31 AM
Archiving chats (humanitarian corruption) [email protected] Astronomy Misc 35 May 19th 06 06:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.