New Apollo 17 images

On Nov 3, 8:53*am, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article
,
*Eric Chomko wrote:



On Nov 1, 1:40*pm, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article
,

*BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 31, 4:57*pm, Matt Wiser wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:35*am, Pat Flannery wrote:

On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat

Impressive. At least Gene and Jack planted the flag well out of the
way of the LM, so that it'd stay standing when the ascent stage fired.
Hopefully the moon hoax nuts will finally shut up, but I'm not betting
the farm on it.

Please tell us how the laws of physics pertaining to photons and Kodak
film is somehow different for the physically dark moon.

*~ BG

Brad,

Please tell us, then, how the "physically dark moon" can reflect so much
light on the Earth that it lights things up.

I doubt that Brad has actually looked up at the moon.

I have always thought that he bays at it!

--
Remove _'s *from email address to talk to me.

Your Jewish wit is noted. Now deductively interpret and say something/
anything intelligent (flatulence doesn't count).

~ BG

On Nov 3, 11:53*am, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article
,
*Eric Chomko wrote:



On Nov 1, 1:40*pm, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:
In article
,

*BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 31, 4:57*pm, Matt Wiser wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:35*am, Pat Flannery wrote:

On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat

Impressive. At least Gene and Jack planted the flag well out of the
way of the LM, so that it'd stay standing when the ascent stage fired.
Hopefully the moon hoax nuts will finally shut up, but I'm not betting
the farm on it.

Please tell us how the laws of physics pertaining to photons and Kodak
film is somehow different for the physically dark moon.

*~ BG

Brad,

Please tell us, then, how the "physically dark moon" can reflect so much
light on the Earth that it lights things up.

I doubt that Brad has actually looked up at the moon.

I have always thought that he bays at it!


No doubt it appears as black as coal to him.

On Nov 4, 8:49*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Nov 3, 9:20*am, Eric Chomko wrote:



On Nov 1, 1:40*pm, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:

In article
,

*BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 31, 4:57*pm, Matt Wiser wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:35*am, Pat Flannery wrote:

On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat

Impressive. At least Gene and Jack planted the flag well out of the
way of the LM, so that it'd stay standing when the ascent stage fired.
Hopefully the moon hoax nuts will finally shut up, but I'm not betting
the farm on it.

Please tell us how the laws of physics pertaining to photons and Kodak
film is somehow different for the physically dark moon.

*~ BG

Brad,

Please tell us, then, how the "physically dark moon" can reflect so much
light on the Earth that it lights things up.

I doubt that Brad has actually looked up at the moon.

Is that your Jewish doubt, or just another typical Jewish perpetrated
doubt?

Oi vay, don't you know that the calendar is based upon the moon, at
least the Hebrew one.


Oops! I'd forgotten that you're another pretend-Atheist and
politically independent that only acts Jewish, so that you get to jump
those faith-based fences all day long.


Yes, I could have been a Mennonite with a persecution complex that's
more neurotic than any Woody Allen character. But then I'd be you.

Good god! 10 years and Guth still thinks he knows more than everyone
else. Forget it, people - he's brain damaged.

BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:35 am, Pat Flannery wrote:
On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat

And some how that physically dark moon is free of X-rays, gamma,
electrostatic charged dust, none of that pesky sodium and not the
least bit of UV secondary fluorescence (in other words our naked moon
is strictly monochrome gray and somewhat inert, as in free of most all
minerals or raw elements?). But none the less, somehow there's water
in them rocks?

Where's the other 99.9% of the LRO science?

How about the Selene/moon L1 science, or didn't they go anywhere near
that zone on their way to the moon?

~ BG

On Nov 5, 2:11*pm, Eric Chomko wrote:
On Nov 4, 8:49*am, BradGuth wrote:



On Nov 3, 9:20*am, Eric Chomko wrote:

On Nov 1, 1:40*pm, Orval Fairbairn
wrote:

In article
,

*BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 31, 4:57*pm, Matt Wiser wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:35*am, Pat Flannery wrote:

On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat

Impressive. At least Gene and Jack planted the flag well out of the
way of the LM, so that it'd stay standing when the ascent stage fired.
Hopefully the moon hoax nuts will finally shut up, but I'm not betting
the farm on it.

Please tell us how the laws of physics pertaining to photons and Kodak
film is somehow different for the physically dark moon.

*~ BG

Brad,

Please tell us, then, how the "physically dark moon" can reflect so much
light on the Earth that it lights things up.

I doubt that Brad has actually looked up at the moon.

Is that your Jewish doubt, or just another typical Jewish perpetrated
doubt?

Oi vay, don't you know that the calendar is based upon the moon, at
least the Hebrew one.



Oops! I'd forgotten that you're another pretend-Atheist and
politically independent that only acts Jewish, so that you get to jump
those faith-based fences all day long.

Yes, I could have been a Mennonite with a persecution complex that's
more neurotic than any Woody Allen character. But then I'd be you.

You've got a 13,000 BP calendar?

~ BG

On Nov 10, 10:34*pm, Obviousman wrote:
Good god! 10 years and Guth still thinks he knows more than everyone
else. Forget it, people - he's brain damaged.

BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 30, 8:35 am, Pat Flannery wrote:
On these you can make out the flag and some details of the LM descent
stage:http://www.onorbit.com/node/1658

Pat

And some how that physically dark moon is free of X-rays, gamma,
electrostatic charged dust, none of that pesky sodium and not the
least bit of UV secondary fluorescence (in other words our naked moon
is strictly monochrome gray and somewhat inert, as in free of most all
minerals or raw elements?). *But none the less, somehow there's water
in them rocks?

Where's the other 99.9% of the LRO science?

How about the Selene/moon L1 science, or didn't they go anywhere near
that zone on their way to the moon?

*~ BG

Nice obfuscation tactic. Exclude, denial, exclude, denial and so
forth.

~ BG