A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Consensus in Post-Truth (Einsteinian) Science



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 1st 21, 11:54 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,011
Default Consensus in Post-Truth (Einsteinian) Science

If Doppler effect in light is taught, only the moving-source scenario is discussed, for the simple reason that in the moving-observer scenario the speed of light is explicitly variable. If the moving-observer scenario is taught, either light is not mentioned at all, in 99% of the cases, or enough confusion is introduced so that the variability of the speed of light relative to the moving observer is camouflaged:

Doppler Effect: Moving Observer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHpPsnJNKrk

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
Ads
  #2  
Old January 2nd 21, 06:59 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,011
Default Consensus in Post-Truth (Einsteinian) Science

In 1887 the Michelson-Morley experiment directly proved Newton's variable speed of light. In 1921 Einstein, already a deity, declared that the experiment had proved constancy of the speed of light. Since then, physicists have been in consensus that the Michelson-Morley experiment gloriously confirms special relativity:

The New York Times, April 19, 1921: "The special relativity arose from the question of whether light had an invariable velocity in free space, he [Einstein] said. The velocity of light could only be measured relative to a body or a co-ordinate system. He sketched a co-ordinate system K to which light had a velocity C. Whether the system was in motion or not was the fundamental principle. This has been developed through the researches of Maxwell and Lorentz, the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light having been based on many of their experiments. But did it hold for only one system? he asked. He gave the example of a street and a vehicle moving on that street. If the velocity of light was C for the street was it also C for the vehicle? If a second co-ordinate system K was introduced, moving with the velocity V, did light have the velocity of C here? When the light traveled the system moved with it, so it would appear that light moved slower and the principle apparently did not hold. Many famous experiments had been made on this point. Michelson showed that relative to the moving co-ordinate system K1, the light traveled with the same velocity as relative to K, which is contrary to the above observation. How could this be reconciled? Professor Einstein asked." https://ebay.com/itm/ALBERT-EINSTEIN...r/373400655156

Brian Cox, p. 91: "...Maxwell's brilliant synthesis of the experimental results of Faraday and others strongly suggested that the speed of light should be the same for all observers. This conclusion was supported by the experimental result of Michelson and Morley, and taken at face value by Einstein.." http://www.amazon.com/Why-Does-mc2-S.../dp/0306817586

Stephen Hawking, A Brief History of Time, Chapter 2: "The special theory of relativity was very successful in explaining that the speed of light appears the same to all observers (as shown by the Michelson-Morley experiment)...." http://www.amazon.com/Brief-History-.../dp/0553380168

Neil deGrasse Tyson: "Beginning in 1905, investigations into the behavior of light got positively spooky. That year, Einstein published his special theory of relativity, in which he ratcheted up M & M's null result to an audacious level. The speed of light in empty space, he declared, is a universal constant, no matter the speed of the light-emitting source or the speed of the person doing the measuring." https://www.amazon.fr/Death-Black-Ho.../dp/039335038X

See mo https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Post-Truth (Einsteinian) Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 September 12th 20 06:15 PM
Einsteinian (Both Post-Truth and Post-Sanity) Science Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 April 18th 20 11:27 PM
Post-Truth (Einsteinian) Science Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 April 25th 19 03:33 PM
Post-Truth (Einsteinian) Science Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 December 21st 17 12:37 AM
Post-Truth (Einsteinian) Science Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 November 6th 17 07:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2021 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.