If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. 


Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1




Why Einsteinians Leave the Sinking Ship
"Fotini MarkopoulouKalamara, a theoretical physicist at the Perimeter Institute, said, "I have the distressing experience of physicists telling me that time is not real. ... It confuses me, because time seems to be real. Things happen. When I clap my hands, it happened. ... I would prefer to say that general relativity is not the final theory than to say that time does not exist." http://www.space.com/29859theillusionoftime.html
Yes, living with Einstein's relative time (spacetime), the idiotic consequence of Einstein's false constantspeedoflight postulate, is unbearable (only the silliest Einsteinians feel comfortable). In the end Fotini started a less idiotic life: "This Physics Pioneer Walked Away from It All. Why Fotini Markopoulou traded quantum gravity for industrial design." http://nautil.us/issue/38/noise/this...ayfromitall Most Einsteinians share Fotini's sentiments and will leave the sinking ship as soon as they find another profitable business: http://www.amazon.com/FasterThanSp.../dp/0738205257 Joao Magueijo, Faster Than the Speed of Light, p. 250: "Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafÃ©s in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc^2, all basic predictions of special relativity. And all denied the possibility of establishing a welldefined border, common to all observers, capable of containing new quantum gravitational effects." http://www.newscientist.com/article/...ersetick.html "...says John Norton, a philosopher based at the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Norton is hesitant to express it, but his instinct  and the consensus in physics  seems to be that space and time exist on their own. The trouble with this idea, though, is that it doesn't sit well with relativity, which describes spacetime as a malleable fabric whose geometry can be changed by the gravity of stars, planets and matter." https://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/re...essonsquantum Perimeter Institute: "Quantum mechanics has one thing, time, which is absolute. But general relativity tells us that space and time are both dynamical so there is a big contradiction there. So the question is, can quantum gravity be formulated in a context where quantum mechanics still has absolute time?" https://www.edge.org/responsedetail/26563 Nobel Laureate David Gross observed, "Everyone in string theory is convinced...that spacetime is doomed. But we don't know what it's replaced by." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U47kyV4TMnE Nima ArkaniHamed (06:09): "Almost all of us believe that spacetime doesn't really exist, spacetime is doomed and has to be replaced by some more primitive building blocks." https://edge.org/responsedetail/25477 What scientific idea is ready for retirement? Steve Giddings: "Spacetime. Physics has always been regarded as playing out on an underlying stage of space and time. Special relativity joined these into spacetime... [...] The apparent need to retire classical spacetime as a fundamental concept is profound..." https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...mefromspace/ "Splitting Time from Space  New Quantum Theory Topples Einstein's Spacetime. Buzz about a quantum gravity theory that sends space and time back to their Newtonian roots." http://www.newscientist.com/article/...spacetime.html "Rethinking Einstein: The end of spacetime. It was a speech that changed the way we think of space and time. The year was 1908, and the German mathematician Hermann Minkowski had been trying to make sense of Albert Einstein's hot new idea  what we now know as special relativity  describing how things shrink as they move faster and time becomes distorted. "Henceforth space by itself and time by itself are doomed to fade into the mere shadows," Minkowski proclaimed, "and only a union of the two will preserve an independent reality." And so spacetime  the malleable fabric whose geometry can be changed by the gravity of stars, planets and matter  was born. It is a concept that has served us well, but if physicist Petr Horava is right, it may be no more than a mirage." https://www.newscientist.com/article...wardsintime/ "[George] Ellis is up against one of the most successful theories in physics: special relativity. It revealed that there's no such thing as objective simultaneity. [...] Rescuing an objective "now" is a daunting task." http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013...realityreview "And by making the clock's tick relative  what happens simultaneously for one observer might seem sequential to another  Einstein's theory of special relativity not only destroyed any notion of absolute time but made time equivalent to a dimension in space: the future is already out there waiting for us; we just can't see it until we get there. This view is a logical and metaphysical dead end, says Smolin." http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22029410.900 New Scientist: "Saving time: Physics killed it. Do we need it back? [...] Einstein landed the fatal blow at the turn of the 20th century." https://www.amazon.com/TimeRebornC.../dp/B00AEGQPFE "Was Einstein wrong? At least in his understanding of time, Smolin argues, the great theorist of relativity was dead wrong. What is worse, by firmly enshrining his error in scientific orthodoxy, Einstein trapped his successors in insoluble dilemmas..." Pentcho Valev 
Ads 
#2




Why Einsteinians Leave the Sinking Ship
John Baez left the sinking ship because he didn't want to live in Einstein's schizophrenic world:
John Baez 2008: "Should I be thinking about quantum gravity? One of the big problems in physics  perhaps the biggest!  is figuring out how our two current best theories fit together. On the one hand we have the Standard Model, which tries to explain all the forces except gravity, and takes quantum mechanics into account. On the other hand we have General Relativity, which tries to explain gravity, and does not take quantum mechanics into account. Both theories seem to be more or less on the right track  but until we somehow fit them together, or completely discard one or both, our picture of the world will be deeply schizophrenic. [...] So, I eventually decided to quit working on quantum gravity." https://www.edge.org/responsedetail/11356 Why fitting together Einstein's relativity and quantum mechanics is schizophrenic? Because it presupposes reconciling Einstein's idiotic relative time, a consequence of Einstein's false constantspeedoflight postulate, and Newton's absolute time (tantamount to reconciling 2+2=5 and 2+2=4 in Big Brother's world): https://www.quantamagazine.org/20161...timeproblem/ "The effort to unify quantum mechanics and general relativity means reconciling totally different notions of time. In quantum mechanics, time is universal and absolute; its steady ticks dictate the evolving entanglements between particles. But in general relativity (Albert Einstein's theory of gravity), time is relative and dynamical, a dimension that's inextricably interwoven with directions X, Y and Z into a fourdimensional "spacetime" fabric." https://www.newscientist.com/article...gobothways/ "In quantum theory, a "master clock" ticks away somewhere in the universe, measuring out all processes. But in Einstein's relativity, time is distorted by motion and gravity, so clocks don't necessarily agree on how it is passing  meaning any master clock must, somewhat implausibly, be outside the universe." https://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/re...essonsquantum Perimeter Institute: "Quantum mechanics has one thing, time, which is absolute. But general relativity tells us that space and time are both dynamical so there is a big contradiction there. So the question is, can quantum gravity be formulated in a context where quantum mechanics still has absolute time?" x http://science.sciencemag.org/conten...cience.aac6498 "In Einstein's general theory of relativity, time depends locally on gravity; in standard quantum theory, time is global â€“ all clocks "tick" uniformly." http://arxiv.org/pdf/grqc/0610057.pdf "One one hand, time in quantum mechanics is a Newtonian time, i.e., an absolute time. In fact, the two main methods of quantization, namely, canonical quantization method due to Dirac and Feynman's path integral method are based on classical constraints which become operators annihilating the physical states, and on the sum over all possible classical trajectories, respectively. Therefore, both quantization methods rely on the Newton global and absolute time. [...] The transition to (special) relativistic quantum field theories can be realized by replacing the unique absolute Newtonian time by a set of timelike parameters associated to the naturally distinguished family of relativistic inertial frames." http://www.hindawi.com/journals/isrn/2013/509316/ "In quantum mechanics, time is absolute. The parameter occurring in the SchrÃ¶dinger equation has been directly inherited from Newtonian mechanics and is not turned into an operator. In quantum field theory, time by itself is no longer absolute, but the fourdimensional spacetime is; it constitutes the fixed background structure on which the dynamical fields act. GR is of a very different nature. According to the Einstein equations (2), spacetime is dynamical, acting in a complicated manner with energy momentum of matter and with itself. The concepts of time (spacetime) in quantum theory and GR are thus drastically different and cannot both be fundamentally true.." Pentcho Valev 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Have All Einsteinians Left the Sinking Ship?  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  0  March 24th 17 11:09 AM 
Einsteiniana: Profiteers Leave the Sinking Ship  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  0  September 9th 16 09:28 AM 
EINSTEINIANS LEAVE THE SINKING SHIP  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  2  December 4th 14 12:29 PM 
HOW EINSTEINIANS LEAVE THE SINKING SHIP  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  0  August 17th 14 07:05 PM 
EINSTEINIANS LEAVE THE SINKING SHIP  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  4  March 31st 14 06:46 PM 