|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
A Triton mission would be much higher in cost, just because you'd have to
monitor the spacecraft while it's in cruise, to make sure everything's OK, and to make sure it's still on course, for a much longer period of time. Neptune is, what, four times further away, and every mission needed monitoring in order to make sure the spacecraft is still working right. -- Sincerely, --- Dave ---------------------------------------------------------------------- It don't mean a thing unless it has that certain "je ne sais quoi" Duke Ellington ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Intertracer" wrote in message oups.com... Chemical rockets and gravity assists are so history... Any serious mission to Jupiter and beyond (including Titan) will have to rely on nuclear power. In fact, huygens would have never landed on Titan if Cassini wasn't powered by the Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator... Hopefully we'll have Nuclear Thermal Rocket in our disposal when the time comes for the next big Titan mission. Another alternative is to use Nucleat Electric Propulsion (that is to feed ion engine from nuclear reactor or a powerful RTG), just like the one they are planning to use for the JIMO mission in 2009. Speaking of rovers, baloons, etc. -- these will also HAVE to use RTG for any lasting mission. It's very encouraging that the upcoming Mars Science Laboratory will rely on such power source either. If it will be airplane (I think it's unlikely), rather than baloon or a rover, then, again, it would probably need nuclear-powered jet engines... People, really, just forget arout oxygen or other stuff like that :-) I don't think Titan rovers are coming any time soon, we'll possibly get to Triton sooner. Just another fascinating world with it's hudge ice volcanoes which are just as fascinating as rivers of methane... Will it be Titan or Triton -- the main idea remains the same. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Yes indeed it's gonna be costly, especially with a bunch of piggybacked
probes and a high-end nuclear-powered propulsion. Still I guess it's more likely that something like this will be attempted before returning to Titan. And we're talking about decades, rather than years :-\ So monitoring the spacecraft during its cruise might not be the most expensive part of the mission, in the long run, even despite it may take 20 years to reach Neptune. Well, let's hope they (we?) find a faster way of getting there The nearest event should be Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter (in a few years), AFAIK no landing probes/baloons/whatsoever are planned. Oh hell we're offtopic now What's your best bet about returning to Titan? 30 years? 60? 100? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Seeing, touching and smelling the extraordinarily Earth-like worldof Titan (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 24th 05 11:00 PM |
UA's Cassini Scientists Ready for First Close Titan Flyby | er | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 26th 04 07:14 AM |
UA's Cassini Scientists Ready for First Close Titan Flyby | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 25th 04 08:35 PM |
New Detailed Images of Titan | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 1st 04 08:05 PM |
Slip Sliding Away (Mars Rovers) | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 16 | March 14th 04 05:07 PM |