#41
|
|||
|
|||
Oriel crank, nutter or bot - frankly who cares?
Oriel crank, nutter or bot - frankly who cares?
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Equinox March 2013
"oriel36" wrote in message
... On Mar 21, 3:17 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" wrote in message ... On Mar 21, 12:39 pm, "Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway" wrote: "oriel36" wrote in message ... An 'untilted' Earth is the same as an Earth with zero inclination ================================= Equinox March 2013, zero inclination toward the sun. Do you know the difference between leaning forward and leaning sideways, dull unimaginative anonymous rude thug? Funny,funny,funny but then again you are no better or worse than the next. ========================================= You are the worst of ALL, dull unimaginative anonymous rude thug. If you want to talk science do it without insulting people first, you arsehole. Crap snipped **** off and die, vicious ugly dull unimaginative anonymous rude thug. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Equinox March 2013
"oriel36" wrote in message
... An 'untilted' Earth is the same as an Earth with zero inclination in which case the Earth's climate would be equatorial insofar as there would be little or no change in conditions. What would remain the same regardless of inclination are the variations in the natural noon cycles arising from the orbital component of the Earth's motion working in tandem with daily rotation,in this case,the equation of time as it refers the 1461 natural noon cycles to the 1461 twenty four hour AM/PM cycles would remain the same. No, that's wrong. The equation of time has TWO components. One comes from the elliptical orbit of the Earth and and hence its varying speed around the Sun. The other comes from the inclination in the Earth's orbital plane, which results in a non-uniform increase in R.A over the course of a year. On an Earth with 'zero inclination', the second factor would be absent, so the equation of time would not remain the same. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Equinox March 2013
On Mar 21, 5:11*pm, "Gavino" wrote:
"oriel36" wrote in message ... An 'untilted' Earth is the same as an Earth with zero inclination in which case the Earth's climate would be equatorial insofar as there would be little or no change in conditions. What would remain the same regardless of inclination are the variations in the natural noon cycles arising from the orbital component of the Earth's motion working in tandem with daily rotation,in this case,the equation of time as it refers the 1461 natural noon cycles to the 1461 twenty four hour AM/PM cycles would remain the same. No, that's wrong. The equation of time has TWO components. One comes from the elliptical orbit of the Earth and and hence its varying speed around the Sun. The other comes from the inclination in the Earth's orbital plane, which results in a non-uniform increase in R.A over the course of a year. On an Earth with 'zero inclination', the second factor would be absent, so the equation of time would not remain the same. I assure you,using direct observations of a planet in motion with two separate types of rotation to the central Sun that daily rotational inclination has nothing whatsoever to do with the natural noon variations.You begin with recognizing the polar day/night cycle which grants the Earth a single rotation to the central Sun as a component of its orbital motion and completely separate to daily rotation and axial inclination. http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/planetary/u...e/science2.jpg Uranus is turning South to North in its daily cycle while maintain a fixed axial orientation in space.What you see as 'axial precession' to the central Sun is really the planet turning by virtue of its orbital behavior and it is that behavior which turns unevenly insofar as all planets vary in speed as the make a circuit of the Sun and this is reflected in the component which turns to the Sun.It is not an assertion,it is not a hypothesis,it is not a theory,it is a 100% observational certainly drawn from interpretation of the images. Of course you need more than one astronomer to interpret what is going on with Uranus and apply the ecliptic axis to the Earth around which the polar coordinates are carried and act like a beacon for the orbital behavior of the Earth - http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/...mericas250.jpg The Earth doesn't lean or tilt,it takes two separate rotations to the central Sun to explain why natural noon cycles vary and why the Equation of Time equalizes the orbital variations while keeping daily rotation pinned to natural noon along with the 24 hour AM/PM cycle. Time to drag yourselves out of the late 17th century and into the 21st century. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation_of_time |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Oriel crank, nutter or bot - frankly who cares?
Oriel crank, nutter or bot - frankly who cares?
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Oriel crank, nutter or bot - frankly who cares?
Martin Nicholson wrote:
Oriel crank, nutter or bot - frankly who cares? You, apparently. Don't feed the trolls. -- I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Equinox March 2013
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Oriel crank, nutter or bot - frankly who cares?
Oriel - it is annoying isn't it when people hijack your threads and
repeat themselves many time a week? Just look how quickly you have been reduced to whining like some sulky teenager about me - now I have adopted your own tactics! For many years now you have been recycling your arguments (your words BTW) on the outer fringes of the astronomical world stating, but not explaining in any way, that 500 years worth of astronomers (your words BTW) are wrong and you are right. Your success rate - in terms of people openly and consistently supporting your views - is close to zero. So isn't it time that you tried to reach out to a new audience - one that hasn't read and rejected your viewpoint quite literally hundreds of times. If you care enough to post here multiple times a day - despite widespread derision - then why don't you care enough to "go the extra mile" and articulate exactly where your views and the views of the mainstream scientific community differ? It seems to me that your current unsuccessful policy - the one that you have been following for years - has pretty much taken over your life and this must be a source of deep unhappiness to you and your therapist. Oriel crank, nutter or bot - frankly who cares? |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Equinox March 2013
On Mar 22, 4:24*am, Martin Nicholson
wrote: Oriel - it is annoying isn't it when people hijack your threads and repeat themselves many time a week? *Just look how quickly you have been reduced to whining like some sulky teenager about me - now I have adopted your own tactics! I think you are doing a fine job and have nothing to say against you or your tactic so make sure you keep up repeating that one sentence - that is an unwanted power I have over you and you have over everyone else.An unmoderated forum has rules and other than the detractor of Starlord,you are the only one I have seen do this but as you will see the penalties are truly awful as you are condemned to repeating a single sentence without end but you do have moderation control over everyone else. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Oriel crank, nutter or bot - frankly who cares?
Oriel - it is annoying isn't it when people hijack your threads and
repeat themselves many time a week? Just look how quickly you have been reduced to whining like some sulky teenager about me - now I have adopted your own tactics! For many years now you have been recycling your arguments (your words BTW) on the outer fringes of the astronomical world stating, but not explaining in any way, that 500 years worth of astronomers (your words BTW) are wrong and you are right. Your success rate - in terms of people openly and consistently supporting your views - is close to zero. So isn't it time that you tried to reach out to a new audience - one that hasn't read and rejected your viewpoint quite literally hundreds of times. If you care enough to post here multiple times a day - despite widespread derision - then why don't you care enough to "go the extra mile" and articulate exactly where your views and the views of the mainstream scientific community differ? It seems to me that your current unsuccessful policy - the one that you have been following for years - has pretty much taken over your life and this must be a source of deep unhappiness to you and your therapist. Oriel crank, nutter or bot - frankly who cares? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space Weather News for March 9, 2013 | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 9th 13 11:25 PM |
The March Equinox 2011 | oriel36[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 18th 11 07:14 PM |
March Equinox 2011 | oriel36[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 6th 11 06:01 PM |