A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Moon's Center of Mass



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 22nd 03, 08:41 PM
AndyK
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moon's Center of Mass

Hi,
What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km
center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset?
Thanks,
Vvega


Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the
earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd
explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly
remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago
anyway...


  #2  
Old July 23rd 03, 10:35 AM
Mike Dworetsky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moon's Center of Mass



"AndyK" wrote in message
...
Hi,
What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km
center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset?
Thanks,
Vvega


Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the
earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd
explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly
remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago
anyway...



I think you mean that lava is less dense than the rocks (otherwise it would
not work its way upwards!).

One reason the lava tended to emerge in the basins and craters of the
nearside is that the crust is much thicker on the farside. When a major
impact event occurred on the farside, the cracking of the surface rocks did
not penetrate into the mantle, but on the nearside this could happen,
eventually leading to upwelling. The maria resulted from much later
flooding of the impact basins (it all took time, millions of years in many
cases).

The displaced centre of mass also affected this. If you think of the
gravitational potential at the surface, a "sea level" if you see the
analogy, the surface on the farside is also a few km higher, so lava also
found it easier to reach the surface on the nearside.

Large impacts occurred on both sides of the moon in about equal numbers, but
only on the nearside could large maria form. The biggest lava plains on the
farside are in Mare Orientale basin and the crater Tsiolkovsky, and by
nearside standards, they are pretty small.

--
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove "pants" spamblock to send e-mail)


  #3  
Old July 23rd 03, 10:35 AM
Mike Dworetsky
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moon's Center of Mass



"AndyK" wrote in message
...
Hi,
What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km
center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset?
Thanks,
Vvega


Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the
earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd
explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly
remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago
anyway...



I think you mean that lava is less dense than the rocks (otherwise it would
not work its way upwards!).

One reason the lava tended to emerge in the basins and craters of the
nearside is that the crust is much thicker on the farside. When a major
impact event occurred on the farside, the cracking of the surface rocks did
not penetrate into the mantle, but on the nearside this could happen,
eventually leading to upwelling. The maria resulted from much later
flooding of the impact basins (it all took time, millions of years in many
cases).

The displaced centre of mass also affected this. If you think of the
gravitational potential at the surface, a "sea level" if you see the
analogy, the surface on the farside is also a few km higher, so lava also
found it easier to reach the surface on the nearside.

Large impacts occurred on both sides of the moon in about equal numbers, but
only on the nearside could large maria form. The biggest lava plains on the
farside are in Mare Orientale basin and the crater Tsiolkovsky, and by
nearside standards, they are pretty small.

--
Mike Dworetsky

(Remove "pants" spamblock to send e-mail)


  #4  
Old July 23rd 03, 04:13 PM
Martin Frey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moon's Center of Mass

"AndyK" wrote:

Hi,
What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km
center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset?
Thanks,
Vvega


Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the
earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd
explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly
remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago
anyway...


How about:

If the vocanism was caused by tidal deformations in the days when the
Moon rotated relative to earth, that volcanism would continue for a
few million years once the Moon slowed down and became locked to
earth's rotation. With greater gravitational force on the earth side,
earth side volcanism would continue longer, leading both to bigger
seas earthside and to displacement of the cog.

Seems plausible (and therefore probably wrong.)

Cheers

Martin

--------------
Martin Frey
N 51 02 E 0 47
--------------
  #5  
Old July 23rd 03, 04:13 PM
Martin Frey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moon's Center of Mass

"AndyK" wrote:

Hi,
What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km
center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset?
Thanks,
Vvega


Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the
earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd
explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly
remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago
anyway...


How about:

If the vocanism was caused by tidal deformations in the days when the
Moon rotated relative to earth, that volcanism would continue for a
few million years once the Moon slowed down and became locked to
earth's rotation. With greater gravitational force on the earth side,
earth side volcanism would continue longer, leading both to bigger
seas earthside and to displacement of the cog.

Seems plausible (and therefore probably wrong.)

Cheers

Martin

--------------
Martin Frey
N 51 02 E 0 47
--------------
  #6  
Old July 23rd 03, 06:31 PM
AndyK
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moon's Center of Mass

Hi,
What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km
center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset?
Thanks,
Vvega


Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the
earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd
explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly
remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago
anyway...


How about:

If the vocanism was caused by tidal deformations in the days when the
Moon rotated relative to earth, that volcanism would continue for a
few million years once the Moon slowed down and became locked to
earth's rotation. With greater gravitational force on the earth side,
earth side volcanism would continue longer, leading both to bigger
seas earthside and to displacement of the cog.

Seems plausible (and therefore probably wrong.)

Cheers

Martin


Well, he asked for a THEORY, not necessarily the correct answer - that's how
I interpreted it anyway :-)


  #7  
Old July 23rd 03, 06:31 PM
AndyK
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Moon's Center of Mass

Hi,
What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km
center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset?
Thanks,
Vvega


Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the
earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd
explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly
remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago
anyway...


How about:

If the vocanism was caused by tidal deformations in the days when the
Moon rotated relative to earth, that volcanism would continue for a
few million years once the Moon slowed down and became locked to
earth's rotation. With greater gravitational force on the earth side,
earth side volcanism would continue longer, leading both to bigger
seas earthside and to displacement of the cog.

Seems plausible (and therefore probably wrong.)

Cheers

Martin


Well, he asked for a THEORY, not necessarily the correct answer - that's how
I interpreted it anyway :-)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 August 5th 04 01:36 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 April 2nd 04 12:01 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 February 2nd 04 03:33 AM
Hubble Uncovers Smallest Moons Yet Seen Around Uranus Ron Baalke Science 11 October 10th 03 12:30 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 September 12th 03 01:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.