|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Moon's Center of Mass
Hi,
What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset? Thanks, Vvega Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago anyway... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Moon's Center of Mass
"AndyK" wrote in message ... Hi, What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset? Thanks, Vvega Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago anyway... I think you mean that lava is less dense than the rocks (otherwise it would not work its way upwards!). One reason the lava tended to emerge in the basins and craters of the nearside is that the crust is much thicker on the farside. When a major impact event occurred on the farside, the cracking of the surface rocks did not penetrate into the mantle, but on the nearside this could happen, eventually leading to upwelling. The maria resulted from much later flooding of the impact basins (it all took time, millions of years in many cases). The displaced centre of mass also affected this. If you think of the gravitational potential at the surface, a "sea level" if you see the analogy, the surface on the farside is also a few km higher, so lava also found it easier to reach the surface on the nearside. Large impacts occurred on both sides of the moon in about equal numbers, but only on the nearside could large maria form. The biggest lava plains on the farside are in Mare Orientale basin and the crater Tsiolkovsky, and by nearside standards, they are pretty small. -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove "pants" spamblock to send e-mail) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Moon's Center of Mass
"AndyK" wrote in message ... Hi, What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset? Thanks, Vvega Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago anyway... I think you mean that lava is less dense than the rocks (otherwise it would not work its way upwards!). One reason the lava tended to emerge in the basins and craters of the nearside is that the crust is much thicker on the farside. When a major impact event occurred on the farside, the cracking of the surface rocks did not penetrate into the mantle, but on the nearside this could happen, eventually leading to upwelling. The maria resulted from much later flooding of the impact basins (it all took time, millions of years in many cases). The displaced centre of mass also affected this. If you think of the gravitational potential at the surface, a "sea level" if you see the analogy, the surface on the farside is also a few km higher, so lava also found it easier to reach the surface on the nearside. Large impacts occurred on both sides of the moon in about equal numbers, but only on the nearside could large maria form. The biggest lava plains on the farside are in Mare Orientale basin and the crater Tsiolkovsky, and by nearside standards, they are pretty small. -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove "pants" spamblock to send e-mail) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Moon's Center of Mass
"AndyK" wrote:
Hi, What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset? Thanks, Vvega Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago anyway... How about: If the vocanism was caused by tidal deformations in the days when the Moon rotated relative to earth, that volcanism would continue for a few million years once the Moon slowed down and became locked to earth's rotation. With greater gravitational force on the earth side, earth side volcanism would continue longer, leading both to bigger seas earthside and to displacement of the cog. Seems plausible (and therefore probably wrong.) Cheers Martin -------------- Martin Frey N 51 02 E 0 47 -------------- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Moon's Center of Mass
"AndyK" wrote:
Hi, What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset? Thanks, Vvega Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago anyway... How about: If the vocanism was caused by tidal deformations in the days when the Moon rotated relative to earth, that volcanism would continue for a few million years once the Moon slowed down and became locked to earth's rotation. With greater gravitational force on the earth side, earth side volcanism would continue longer, leading both to bigger seas earthside and to displacement of the cog. Seems plausible (and therefore probably wrong.) Cheers Martin -------------- Martin Frey N 51 02 E 0 47 -------------- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Moon's Center of Mass
Hi,
What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset? Thanks, Vvega Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago anyway... How about: If the vocanism was caused by tidal deformations in the days when the Moon rotated relative to earth, that volcanism would continue for a few million years once the Moon slowed down and became locked to earth's rotation. With greater gravitational force on the earth side, earth side volcanism would continue longer, leading both to bigger seas earthside and to displacement of the cog. Seems plausible (and therefore probably wrong.) Cheers Martin Well, he asked for a THEORY, not necessarily the correct answer - that's how I interpreted it anyway :-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Moon's Center of Mass
Hi,
What is the process which caused the Moon's 2 Km center-of-mass/center-of-figure offset? Thanks, Vvega Possibly lava (denser than the other rocks) tending to emerge on the earth-facing side, back when the moon was volcanically active? That'd explain why there aren't many large "seas" on the far side too. I dimly remember a theory along such lines being fashionable a few decades ago anyway... How about: If the vocanism was caused by tidal deformations in the days when the Moon rotated relative to earth, that volcanism would continue for a few million years once the Moon slowed down and became locked to earth's rotation. With greater gravitational force on the earth side, earth side volcanism would continue longer, leading both to bigger seas earthside and to displacement of the cog. Seems plausible (and therefore probably wrong.) Cheers Martin Well, he asked for a THEORY, not necessarily the correct answer - that's how I interpreted it anyway :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 5th 04 01:36 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
Hubble Uncovers Smallest Moons Yet Seen Around Uranus | Ron Baalke | Science | 11 | October 10th 03 12:30 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |