|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pre Big Bang was ?????
A ripple in the structure of space.Quantum space energy was waiting for the force of gravity.With two there was entanglement.Keep in mind the universes can not be a singular .Stuff has to relate.Twins are in.Small stuff creates big stuff and universes prove it TreBert
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pre Big Bang was ?????
On Friday, March 10, 2017 at 3:47:54 PM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
A ripple in the structure of space.Quantum space energy was waiting for the force of gravity.With two there was entanglement.Keep in mind the universes can not be a singular .Stuff has to relate.Twins are in.Small stuff creates big stuff and universes prove it TreBert Waiting for the force of gravity must have been more tedious than Waiting for Godot! Double-A |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(no, he doesn’t) (yes, he does) BANG BANG | Arc Michael | Misc | 0 | May 14th 16 08:49 PM |
Big Bang | Antares 531 | Astronomy Misc | 53 | September 18th 10 07:34 PM |
Redshift and Microwave radiation favor Atom Totality and disfavorBig Bang #9; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory; replaces Big Bang theory | Net-Teams, | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 31st 10 05:19 PM |
B, Big, Big Bang, Big Bang Books... | socalsw | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | June 7th 04 09:17 AM |
BIG BANG really a Big Bang BUST | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 27 | November 7th 03 10:38 AM |