|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Night light
On 22/05/2013 23:33, jbm wrote:
I was out with the dog just now on the local playing field. Clear sky, bright almost full moon lighting up the field quite nicely. In addition, there is a high intensity street light just off the field that brightens up half the field even more. That sets the scenario. Just before 10:45, the field suddenly brightened up quite appreciably. Looking towards WNW, something VERY big and VERY bright fell to earth. I know what planes look like at night, and I know what meteors look like passing through the upper atmosphere, and this most certainly wasn't either of those. I would estimate its diameter as about 10% of the moon's, big to say the least. The light intensity was almost blinding, bright white, was up there for about 5 seconds, and then abruptly died out about 10-15 degrees above the horizon. The field was as bright as during a heavily overcast afternoon. Though I couldn't detect any fiery tail, it reminded me very much of the meteorite that fell in Russia recently. If any one finds out what it was, please let me know. It probably was a fireball rather than a meteorite, but just in case it did actually put a piece of rock on the deck I have crossposted into uk.sci.astronomy in the hope that some others saw it the same night. Meteorites are actually quite valuable. Interesting random fact. Japanese insurers will not pay out for damage to a home caused by a meteorite. Luckily any meteorite that is big enough to cause damage is usually worth more than the damage it causes. The eye doesn't do very well estimating the size of bright objects at night. It was probably a pinpoint with a lot of optical flare. Duration is about right and if it faded then it may have slowed and fallen to ground. Any delayed acoustic effects like sonic booms ? If it was a hefty meteor you do usually get a visible trail but it could easily be masked by thin cloud and local light pollution. The other thing it could have been although they are not normally quite as bright as you have implied here are Iridium satellite flares. They can be upto a fair proportion of the brighness of a full moon and last about 5-10 obviously they leave no trail. http://www.heavens-above.com/IridiumFlares.aspx http://www.satobs.org/iridium.htm You need to feed it date, lat & long to get an answer. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Night light
On Thu, 23 May 2013 09:16:50 +0100, Martin Brown wrote:
The other thing it could have been although they are not normally quite as bright as you have implied here are Iridium satellite flares. Good point but they are very restricted on where they are visible from. IIRC the track is only a few miles wide at best and we have a couple of other widely spaced reports of a similar event at the same time. -- Cheers Dave. Nr Garrigill, Cumbria. 421m ASL. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Night light
On 23/05/2013 09:46, Dave Liquorice wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2013 09:16:50 +0100, Martin Brown wrote: The other thing it could have been although they are not normally quite as bright as you have implied here are Iridium satellite flares. Good point but they are very restricted on where they are visible from. IIRC the track is only a few miles wide at best and we have a couple of other widely spaced reports of a similar event at the same time. Yes. The brightness falls off very rapidly away from the ground track. They are still quite fun if you get a -8 mag one. -12.5 is a fullmoon. My only reason for suggesting it was the no smoke trail. Most really bright meteors I have ever seen had one that persisted for a few seconds and with a moonlit sky should have been seen for even longer. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Night light
On 5/23/2013 4:06 AM, Martin Brown wrote:
On 23/05/2013 09:46, Dave Liquorice wrote: On Thu, 23 May 2013 09:16:50 +0100, Martin Brown wrote: The other thing it could have been although they are not normally quite as bright as you have implied here are Iridium satellite flares. Good point but they are very restricted on where they are visible from. IIRC the track is only a few miles wide at best and we have a couple of other widely spaced reports of a similar event at the same time. Yes. The brightness falls off very rapidly away from the ground track. They are still quite fun if you get a -8 mag one. -12.5 is a fullmoon. My only reason for suggesting it was the no smoke trail. Most really bright meteors I have ever seen had one that persisted for a few seconds and with a moonlit sky should have been seen for even longer. IF the object was comming directly towards you and did not penatrate the atmosphere to far you may not have seen the trail |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Night light
On May 23, 4:03*pm, David Staup wrote:
On 5/23/2013 4:06 AM, Martin Brown wrote: On 23/05/2013 09:46, Dave Liquorice wrote: On Thu, 23 May 2013 09:16:50 +0100, Martin Brown wrote: The other thing it could have been although they are not normally quite as bright as you have implied here are Iridium satellite flares. Good point but they are very restricted on where they are visible from. IIRC the track is only a few miles wide at best and we have a couple of other widely spaced reports of a similar event at the same time. Yes. The brightness falls off very rapidly away from the ground track. They are still quite fun if you get a -8 mag one. -12.5 is a fullmoon. My only reason for suggesting it was the no smoke trail. Most really bright meteors I have ever seen had one that persisted for a few seconds and with a moonlit sky should have been seen for even longer. IF the object was comming directly towards you and did not penatrate the atmosphere to far you may not have seen the trail. Silly boy. All meteorites come down at an hell of an angle, don't you ever watch Hollywood films? All except the ones that hit the moon of course -and those gianormous craters that kill dinosaurs. They invariably fall very close to the perpendicular. Everyone knows that. Even dinosaurs. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Orbital night city light visibility | David Findlay | Space Shuttle | 6 | May 16th 07 05:27 PM |
Light Pollution and the Loss of the Night Sky | TBerk | Amateur Astronomy | 20 | August 12th 06 03:23 AM |
Bright blue light observed in night sky | Frackshat | Amateur Astronomy | 15 | June 7th 06 09:21 AM |
First Light Images with FSQ and Pentax 67 on a not so perfect night | William R. Mattil | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | January 3rd 06 01:52 AM |
Friday Night / Light Shade | Starlord | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | September 28th 03 04:40 AM |