Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

Do those laws of physics really function differently while on the
moon? (according to our Apollo missions, apparently so) As perhaps
otherwise something like the newish planet of Venus and even our
physically dark Selene/moon that may have belonged to Sirius B, with
conceivably our Venus having been what those Dogon implied as Sirius C
was perhaps not actually that of any third star, and otherwise the
remaining Sirius star system wobble being caused by whatever Sirius D
of .057 Ms (roughly 60 Mj) represents their true origin of where the
geologically newish Venus and our Selene/moon came from either Sirius
B or conceivably Sirius D that may have been a third star. At this
juncture we simply have too many unknowns and little if any talent or
resources focused upon the nearby Sirius star/solar system, so for the
moment there’s no objective proof-positive either way.

http://www.icr.org/article/3394/
“Using experimentally-determined diffusion coefficients for hydration
of olivine, water diffusion profiles were calculated for all three
crystallographic axes of an olivine grain at a temperature of
1245±45ºC for various durations, with an initial water content of ~312
weight parts per million (wt ppm) and a final water content of 0 wt
ppm at its rim. Thus it was possible to approximate the ascent rate of
the mantle xenoliths and, by extension, their host basalt. The
calculated ascent rates ranged from 1.9 hours at 1290ºC to 3.4 hours
at 1245ºC and 6.3 hours at 1200ºC. Furthermore, FTIR analyses across
cracks in the olivine grains did not exhibit any perturbations of the
hydrogen profiles, so hydrogen diffusion from the grain rims occurred
predominantly prior to the cracking of the grains near the earth's
surface or after the eruption of the host basalt. Therefore, these
mantle xenoliths must have reached the earth's surface in a matter of
only several hours.”

What part of zero ppm (“water content of 0 wt ppm at its rim”) do we
still not fully understand, and try to remember that this crystal dry
lunar environment is offering a near ideal vacuum, and even originally
its surface shouldn’t have offered at most more then 0.1 bar unless it
was covered in a thick layer of ice (as otherwise it’s not exactly
solid or much less liquid h2o friendly).

If there’s any surface basalt as loose rock and dust that contains
water, unless it were otherwise deposited by meteors and comets, as
such would tend to impose and/or reinforce my ongoing interpretation
that our Selene/moon was once upon a time covered by a very thick
layer of ice. As otherwise there shouldn’t but few if any ppm worth
of water to behold unless going deep, because the element or molecule
water needs pressure in order to coexist within basalt, and
unfortunately the one common thing our Selene/moon doesn’t offer is
pressure. So, unless we’re talking about going several km deep into
that thick and robust crust, there’s not going to bel all that much
h2o to behold.

If our moon were made extensively of Earth, then it’s crust and
surface of lose rock and dust should be similar in measurable ways to
that of terrestrial basalts.
http://bulletin.geoscienceworld.org/...ract/85/9/1485
“Chlorine, Sulfur, and Water in Magmas and Oceans”

However, it seems our currently naked Selene/moon is one of
considerable sodium and otherwise saturated and/or deposited in many
other unusually dark and heavy elements, including UV reactive
minerals, as well as those even heavier elements of radioactive and
their unavoidable secondary isotopes.

So, where’s the other 99.9% of our spendy LRO and LCROSS science that
obviously does not necessarily support our previous Apollo science or
mission physics?

Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”



On Oct 15, 6:54*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Sep 21, 7:02*am, BradGuth wrote:


On Aug 24, 11:07*am, BradGuth wrote:

Now we have a new and improved gauntlet of a topic/author taboo and/or
banishment enforced policy, or rather media infowar tactic, even if it
means forcing mainstream to ignore any fix to our badly GW traumatized
environment and of its unique biodiversity we call Eden/Earth, or
merely on behalf of improving it’s use of government and our limited
resources. The biggest forbidden topics have to do with discussing
other forms of off-world intelligent life, because such isn’t supposed
to exist unless it’s of a subhuman Zionist/Jewish species that we get
to dominate and profit from. (isn't that special)

All we seem to get nowadays is the usual Republican Zionist Nazi
replies of change nothing and otherwise do nothing, because apparently
nothing is bad with the way everything is, and besides nothing
seriously bad is ever going to happen, and even if it should we mere
humans couldn't have done anything positive or constructive for the
better.

In other Usenet/newsgroup words of cult/cabal wisdom; *Change nothing,
revise nothing and above all do nothing about learning, exploring,
researching or forbid any public sharing of whatever knowledge,
because we (those in charge) supposedly like everything exactly as it
is.

*~ BG

On Jul 6, 6:55*am, BradGuth wrote:

Sirius and our solar system are clearly inseparable, at least
according to the regular laws of physics, Newtonian gravity and
orbital mechanics.

In spite of whatever those mainstream textbooks and their puppet media
has to say, we seem to have become closely associated with the Sirius
star cluster, even though Sirius has only been a relatively newish and
extremely vibrant stellar evolution (quite possibly contributed from
our encountering another galaxy), and especially terrestrial
illuminating of the first 200~250 million years worth.

First off, it took a cosmic molecular cloud worth perhaps at the very
least 125,000 solar masses in order to produce such a 12.5 mass worthy
star system, leaving 99.99% of that molecular mass as supposedly blown
away and having to fend for itself, at a place and time when our
existing solar system wasn't any too far away. *Others might go so far
as to suggest a more than likely molecular cloud mass of 1.25 million,
while still others yet would prefer a more robust cloud worthy of 12.5
million solar masses as having emerged from encountering a smaller
galaxy that merged with our Milky Way. *In any case, that must have
been quite a stellar birthing process, especially if the remains of
this terrific cloud of originally near 100 ly diameter is suddenly
nowhere to be found.

In any case, there's no way that our passive little solar system
wasn't somehow directly affected by and otherwise having become tidal
radius interrelated with such a nearby mass, and/or at least
subsequently associated with the mutual barycenter that's primarily
dominated by the Sirius star/solar system.

Lo and behold, it seems that numerous mergers of galactic proportions
isn’t nearly as uncommon as some of our perpetual naysayers and Big
Bang of devout OT thumpers might care to suggest.

Our Milky Way Galaxy and its Companions (we are not alone)
*http://www.public.asu.edu/~rjansen/l...ocalgroup.html

The Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission: (mainstream media ignored)
*http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/are...cfm?fareaid=20
*http://www.spacedaily.com/news/milkyway-04m.html

Local galactic motion simulation:
*"The Geneva-Copenhagen survey of the Solar neighbourhood", by B.
Nordström et al.
*http://www.aanda.org/content/view/71/42/lang,en

According to several physics and astronomy kinds of *observationology
science (deductive interpretation of eye-candy plus other peer
replicated research), our Milky Way is made up of at least two
galactic units, with more of the same on their blue-shifted way
towards encountering us (namely Andromeda). *Seems hardly fair
considering that everything was supposedly created via one singular
Big Bang, not to mention that hundreds to perhaps thousands of
galaxies seem rather nicely headed into the Great Attractor (including
us) for their final demise and/or rebirth.

Don’t forget to appreciate those Hubble, KECK and multiple other
archives (including those of what FAS has compiled) depicting
“colliding galaxies”, as well as soon to become ESA color/hue enhanced
and expanded upon via a trio of their impressive orbital
observatories, not to mention whatever the renewed and improved Hubble
plus our next generation of orbital observatories should further
document. *It may even become hard to find galaxies as massive as ours
and Andromeda that are entirely original without their having grown
via mergers.

Where's our TRACEe3 and the all-knowing expertise from FAS, telling us
whatever they seem to know best or at least suspect is most likely?
Surely these brown-nosed clowns of mostly pretend Atheists, as well as
republican faith-based bigots and typically closed mindsets of our
Usenet/newsgroup cabal that are enforcing their mainstream status quo
(much like my personal rabbi shadow tries to do), are hopefully not
representing or otherwise speaking on behalf of our FAS.

*~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”

Even though gravity is an extremely weak force, when there's enough
matter associated with a given star/solar system to place an affect
another nearby star/solar system, and it's especially so if such mass
is as nearby as our solar system and Sirius as already heading
elliptically towards one another, as is the case with us and Sirius.

Cosmological Ice Ages (by Henry Kroll)

The example ratio of 8.3e7:1 is how much greater our solar system
remains via Newtonian force, as having been attracted to the existing
Sirius star/solar system, than otherwise associated with 2005-VX3
being the item (damocloid/asteroid) of 112 km diameter that’s forever
attracted to our sun. *This Sirius:XV3 ratio of 8.3e7:1 is just
another Newtonian matter of objective and peer accepted fact that you
and others can take to the bank (unless it’s a kosher bank, in which
case you're not allowed to deposit anything that’s not of their
mainstream faith-based approval, because according to their long
standing policy and subsequent rules applied to everyone else, Eden/
Earth is always alone and supposedly all there is for accommodating
any complex biodiversity, and everything about our environment is
strictly terrestrial and somehow having nothing whatsoever to do with
human or external factors because, apparently their Eden/Earth has
been given unlimited and renewable resources of everything we need as
is, except for an inflated price).

Gravity Force of Attraction (orbital tidal radius)
*http://www.1728.com/gravity.htm
*http://www.wsanford.com/~wsanford/ca...alculator.html

Individual mass and velocity are of course significant and the most
dominate of the trajectory factors, and then it gets especially complex
whenever there's more than two given bodies of mass to consider that
are each in proper motion to one another. *This however doesn't
exclude our interacting with the Sirius star system, or otherwise
obfuscate/exclude what the weak force of gravity and the subsequent
laws of Newtonian orbital mechanics has to say.

There's no possibly way we're not dominated by what the nearby and
still extremely vibrant Sirius star/solar system represents, much less
of what it used to represent before having lost so much of its
original mass, and before then of what the molecular cloud of 12.5e6
Ms represented.

~ BG

This one has become almost as good as my other topics of:

"The Big Idea / Geoengineering “Shading The Earth” / Brad Guth
(Shading The Earth with our moon)"

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...acac4cf?hl=en#

-

"The 1~10% hollow moon / Brad Guth"

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...a50160d?hl=en#

-

"The Secret Radar Pixels of Venus / by Brad Guth"

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a...6b05c94?hl=en#

Apparently those Newtonian and other laws of physics are conditional,
as based upon the faith-based politics and special interest group
mindset of the day. No wonder the deductive science of
observationology remains as taboo/nondisclosure rated, and otherwise
always forbid whatever revisionism.

Everything from shading Earth with our moon to appreciating the other
intelligent life existing/coexisting on Venus, and of course those
"Cosmological Ice Ages" are each examples where those laws of physics
and best available science do not count, and otherwise our public
Usenet/newsgroups becomes a kosher free-for-all kind of food fight.

~ BG

On Oct 18, 7:28*am, BradGuth wrote:
This one has become almost as good as my other topics of:

"The Big Idea / Geoengineering “Shading The Earth” / Brad Guth
(Shading The Earth with our moon)"

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/6a4353...

-

"The 1~10% hollow moon / Brad Guth"

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/b88503...

-

"The Secret Radar Pixels of Venus / by Brad Guth"

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.a.../thread/8a40c1...

Apparently those Newtonian and other laws of physics are conditional,
as based upon the faith-based politics and special interest group
mindset of the day. * No wonder the deductive science of
observationology remains as taboo/nondisclosure rated, and otherwise
always forbid whatever revisionism.

Everything from shading Earth with our moon to appreciating the other
intelligent life existing/coexisting on Venus, and of course those
"Cosmological Ice Ages" are each examples where those laws of physics
and best available science do not count, and otherwise our public
Usenet/newsgroups becomes a kosher free-for-all kind of food fight.

Why can't the Newtonian laws of gravity be applied for how our solar
system has been affected by the massive and vibrant Sirius star system
that we're once again headed towards?

Imagine the molecular cloud of 12.5e6 Ms that supposedly gave birth to
those Sirius stars, and how that amount of nearby mass should have
affected us.

~ BG