|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Einstien was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Nightbat,and Double-A When Einstein was in Texas teaching hydraulics he patterned an invention "refrigeration" with no moving parts He was also a good violin player. Had a sense of humor. Had very smart friends. He knew when he was right. Bert I thought you were just whistling Dixie, Bert, but then I found: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...at1781541/www/ Perhaps Einstein was closer to discovering the Wolter refrigerator model of the universe than I had thought! Certainly he must have considered concepts of compression and density of space in developing his warped space GR model. Double-A |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Double-A Einstein had much Jewish prejudice from the time he was born to the time of his death. So is the way of the witless in his spacetime. Now he is accused to be and idiot in our present spacetime that he can not witness. This proves humankind has its hate built in from one generation to the next. This proves that man is wolf to man(Darwin) Freud! This proves that nature created a species of higher life,that was not the best life form to show the universe. Humankind has intrinsic hate. Reality even at this Christmas season man has great hate for one group to the next group to the next group. A critical force of hate,that can only explode. Sad theory but based on great evidence through out the history of man Bert "And in despair I bowed my head "There is no peace on earth," I said, "For hate is strong and mocks the song Of peace on earth, good will to men."" - "Christmas Bells" by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow Double-A |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Einstien was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT
"Double-A" wrote in message
ups.com... G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Nightbat,and Double-A When Einstein was in Texas teaching hydraulics he patterned an invention "refrigeration" with no moving parts He was also a good violin player. Had a sense of humor. Had very smart friends. He knew when he was right. Bert I thought you were just whistling Dixie, Bert, but then I found: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einst...at1781541/www/ Perhaps Einstein was closer to discovering the Wolter refrigerator model of the universe than I had thought! Certainly he must have considered concepts of compression and density of space in developing his warped space GR model. Double-A I'm as convinced of this as i am certain that Einstein applied his math to the task and found that, while E = mc^2 on the electromagnetic radiation scale, on the scale of the dynamic flowing of the SPED, energy "E" was equal to "m" multiplied by a far greater velocity. Bill and i have been tossing around the nonmath idea of E = mc³, but what if the actual energy of flowing space is equal to "m" times the speed of gravity? (or more accurately, the speed of space itself)... E = m(c x 2 x 10^20)² or... E = mVg² ....where Vg is the so-called "speed of gravity" (actually the speed of flowing space)? And it would come to me as no surprise, after he saw what his EM equation had led to in Japan, that Einstein would have withheld not only an equation for space-energy conversion, but also the distinct fact that space was by no means made of "nothing". He was perhaps hoping that by the time this was independently discovered, humankind would be much older and wiser than those who waged war in the 20th century. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- The best things in life are here and now! Indelibly yours, Paine http://www.savethechildren.org/ http://www.painellsworth.net |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist... and so was Isaac Asimov
Double-A wrote: I think it takes a strong "faith" to believe that God does not exist, because there is no proof that he does not. l do not have that kind of faith. I think it takes a strong 'faith' to believe that Superman does not exist, because there is no proof that he does not. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Einstien was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT
From Painius:
...what if actual energy of flowing space is equal to "m" times the speed of gravity? (or more accurately, the speed of space itself)... ******E = m(c x 2 x 10^20)² or... ******E = mVg² ...where Vg is the so-called "speed of gravity" (actually the speed of flowing space)? As was just stated in another thread, what this is describing is _speed of gravitational charge_ which is functionally instantaneous irrespective of distance. This is distinct from velocity of spatial flow itself. Space flow into Earth's surface, for instance, is equivalent to escape velocity, or 11.2 km/s (about 7 mps). Same with any celestial body; speed of inflow at surface datum is equal to that body's escape velocity. And it would come to me as no surprise, after he saw what his EM equation had led to in Japan, that Einstein would have withheld not only an equation for space-energy conversion, but also the distinct fact that space was by no means made of "nothing". He was perhaps hoping that by the time this was independently discovered, humankind would be much older and wiser than those who waged war in the 20th century. This is what i much prefer to believe of the sly and incredibly wise old elf. oc |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist... and so was Isaac Asimov
Go back to school boy ! (not sunday bible school) REAL school and learn
something for god (he dosn't exist) sake Man you are so ignorant that it hurts ! Religion is the main course regarding mass killing through history ! -snip Atheists or atheistic systems (mainly socialism) have killed more innocent people than all the Christians who have ever lived on earth. Swallow that, AE. Oh, sorry, I forgot. You're dead and already know it. -Me If there's no afterlife, I'm really gonna be ****ed off. ; - ) GO AHEAD START ****ING OFF NOW ;-) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jeg beskyttes af den gratis SPAMfighter til privatbrugere. Den har indtil videre sparet mig for at få 1381 spam-mails Betalende brugere får ikke denne besked i deres e-mails. Hent en gratis SPAMfighter her. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Einstien was an atheist. EINSTEIN WAS REALLY A WISE OLD ELF
From NB:
...my model lends to observation confirmation and/or nullification, while Officer oc's for Wolter's depends on beyond observable Universe dependence, non observable reality, or nullable imaginary based model. Admittedly, Wolter's CBB model depends on intuitive extrapolation(IE), that is, deducing the nature of the unseen from a pattern/principle/planform seen consistently and universally throughout nature, and presuming the unseen is more likely to embody that same pattern/principle/planform, than not. The minute you recognize space for what it is, a dynamic, sub-Planck-wavelength field of stupendous energy density and hydrodynamic pressure, the next question must invariably arise: What manner of 'Engine' is capable of driving and sustaining so energetic a Field? What sort of 'compressor' and Master Oscillator rings out the 'tones' whose sub-harmonics give rise to the Periodic Table? The CBB model with its centerpiece Primal Particle provides just that 'Engine'/compressor/'Master Oscillator'. Very much like String theory... Nay, nyet. While string theory does posit some sort of vibrational underpinning, it remains clueless as to the 'Engine' driving it. Also, it depends on ad hockery such as 'eleven dimensions' to try to mathematicavlly unify gravity and the strong nuclear force under the VSP. It depicts gravity some sort of emanation from those 'higher dimensions'. The dynamic is no different than geocentrism's use of 'epicycles' - applying perfectly good math to try to validate a false premise. ...needing more and more dimensions, branes, and Universes to try to close the loop but without plus/negative confirmable evidence for same. Yep. More and more fixes, fudges and kludges. Whereas the CBB model needs no such ad hockery. Without ever holding unification as an objective, it seamlessly unifies gravity and the SNF. It unifies relativity and QM. It explains the mechanism of gravity and gravity-accereration equivalence. It provides the next expansion/extension of special relativity to include _density frames_ of the spatial medium, holding c constant in all density frames just as SR holds it constant in all inertial frames. It explains 'c-dilation' as the drop in lightspeed _as observed from the external frame_ across the expansion of the universe, with c remaining fixed *locally* in the absence of any density gradient. No constants are ever violated, not the Lorentz invariance, the fine structure constant, the lightspeed constant, or any other constant. And the CBB model doesn't require any 'higher dimensions' beyond our familiar three. It simply replaces the 'Void' with the SPED and one primal Flow driven by one Force. With its numerous sidebars providing so much collaboration and corroboration while explaining the one simple mechanism behind all of physical reality, and without needing one iota of math to do it, what if perhaps the CBB model really *is* true? oc |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist... and so was Isaac Asimov
"Tim McGaughy" wrote...
in message ... Double-A wrote: I think it takes a strong "faith" to believe that God does not exist, because there is no proof that he does not. l do not have that kind of faith. I think it takes a strong 'faith' to believe that Superman does not exist, because there is no proof that he does not. I thing it takes a strong "faith" to believe that Santa Claus does not exist, because there is no proof that he does not. happy days and... starry starry nights! -- The best things in life are here and now! Indelibly yours, Paine http://www.savethechildren.org/ http://www.painellsworth.net |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Einstien was an atheist. EINSTEIN WAS REALLY A WISE OLD ELF
nightbat wrote
Bill Sheppard wrote: From NB: ...my model lends to observation confirmation and/or nullification, while Officer oc's for Wolter's depends on beyond observable Universe dependence, non observable reality, or nullable imaginary based model. Admittedly, Wolter's CBB model depends on intuitive extrapolation(IE), that is, deducing the nature of the unseen from a pattern/principle/planform seen consistently and universally throughout nature, and presuming the unseen is more likely to embody that same pattern/principle/planform, than not. The minute you recognize space for what it is, a dynamic, sub-Planck-wavelength field of stupendous energy density and hydrodynamic pressure, the next question must invariably arise: What manner of 'Engine' is capable of driving and sustaining so energetic a Field? What sort of 'compressor' and Master Oscillator rings out the 'tones' whose sub-harmonics give rise to the Periodic Table? The CBB model with its centerpiece Primal Particle provides just that 'Engine'/compressor/'Master Oscillator'. Very much like String theory... Nay, nyet. While string theory does posit some sort of vibrational underpinning, it remains clueless as to the 'Engine' driving it. Also, it depends on ad hockery such as 'eleven dimensions' to try to mathematicavlly unify gravity and the strong nuclear force under the VSP. It depicts gravity some sort of emanation from those 'higher dimensions'. The dynamic is no different than geocentrism's use of 'epicycles' - applying perfectly good math to try to validate a false premise. ...needing more and more dimensions, branes, and Universes to try to close the loop but without plus/negative confirmable evidence for same. Yep. More and more fixes, fudges and kludges. Whereas the CBB model needs no such ad hockery. Without ever holding unification as an objective, it seamlessly unifies gravity and the SNF. It unifies relativity and QM. It explains the mechanism of gravity and gravity-accereration equivalence. It provides the next expansion/extension of special relativity to include _density frames_ of the spatial medium, holding c constant in all density frames just as SR holds it constant in all inertial frames. It explains 'c-dilation' as the drop in lightspeed _as observed from the external frame_ across the expansion of the universe, with c remaining fixed *locally* in the absence of any density gradient. No constants are ever violated, not the Lorentz invariance, the fine structure constant, the lightspeed constant, or any other constant. And the CBB model doesn't require any 'higher dimensions' beyond our familiar three. It simply replaces the 'Void' with the SPED and one primal Flow driven by one Force. With its numerous sidebars providing so much collaboration and corroboration while explaining the one simple mechanism behind all of physical reality, and without needing one iota of math to do it, what if perhaps the CBB model really *is* true? oc nightbat Well since no one else even comes close to presenting a viable premise for closing the gravitational loop for field unity, it's debatable. That Darla however has taken favor with you Officer oc is interesting while respecting the nightbat's friendship and authority. respectfully, the nightbat |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EINSTEIN DIDN'T KNOW WHY | ACE | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 28th 05 07:07 PM |
Calling Einstein bluff .. OK AGAIN with CApItaLS CALLING EINSTEIN BLUFF, MEASURING OWLS | ftl_freak | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 04:48 PM |
Calling Einstein bluff .. OK AGAIN with CApItaLS CALLING EINSTEIN BLUFF, MEASURING OWLS | ftl_freak | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 04:09 PM |
Einstein | Tom Kirke | Astronomy Misc | 10 | June 1st 05 10:13 PM |
Einstein | Tom Kirke | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | June 1st 05 10:13 PM |