A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NASA still trying to prove the moon landing wasn't faked.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 21st 18, 08:52 AM posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,sci.space.history,alt.survival,sac.politics,uk.politics.misc
Gunner Asch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 60
Default NASA still trying to prove the moon landing wasn't faked.

Vidcapper wrote on 7/21/2018 2:29 AM:
On 21/07/2018 02:58, Bradley K. Shurman wrote:
Image 24 where there is no disturbance of the "moon" dirt from a
rocket engine firing.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/scien...-moon-landing-
photos-Apollo-11-pictures-Neil-Armstrong


NASA don't have to prove anything - it is the idiotic conspiracy
theorists job to try & prove their case - which they can't, as all
their claims are easily debunked.


Please watch the landing video in the link.

The camera was shooting at the landing ground on the moon surface while
the lander was descending. They forgot to add flying moon dust in the
Hollywood studio.

Pay attention to the landing site when the camera was shooting at the
moon surface. There is no flying moon dust or exhaust smoke from the
rocket engine.



Gunner

My name is Mark Wieber the shameless ass.

My friends call me the baddest lying ass in Taft.

I love to trash the socialist system that saved my life.

I don't pay my hospital bills, rent & taxes, and I feel no shame.

Mark Wieber (Gunner Asch) - self employed "Coyote Engineering" scrapper.
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


  #2  
Old July 21st 18, 11:13 AM posted to rec.crafts.metalworking, sci.space.history, alt.survival, sac.politics, uk.politics.misc
johnny-knowall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default NASA still trying to prove the moon landing wasn't faked.

On 21 Jul 2018, Gunner Asch wrote
(in article ):

Vidcapper wrote on 7/21/2018 2:29 AM:
On 21/07/2018 02:58, Bradley K. Shurman wrote:
Image 24 where there is no disturbance of the "moon" dirt from a
rocket engine firing.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/scien...-moon-landing-
photos-Apollo-11-pictures-Neil-Armstrong


NASA don't have to prove anything - it is the idiotic conspiracy
theorists job to try & prove their case - which they can't, as all
their claims are easily debunked.


Please watch the landing video in the link.

The camera was shooting at the landing ground on the moon surface while
the lander was descending. They forgot to add flying moon dust in the
Hollywood studio.

Pay attention to the landing site when the camera was shooting at the
moon surface. There is no flying moon dust or exhaust smoke from the
rocket engine.


Wasn’t that because the lander had very little fuel, and Armstrong was
guiding it down like an aircraft using his own skill and experience? They
needed to save some fuel for the take off again, or they would have been
stuck there.

I’m sure that is what he said on an interview many years ago.



Gunner

My name is Mark Wieber the shameless ass.

My friends call me the baddest lying ass in Taft.

I love to trash the socialist system that saved my life.

I don't pay my hospital bills, rent & taxes, and I feel no shame.

Mark Wieber (Gunner Asch) - self employed "Coyote Engineering" scrapper.
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



  #3  
Old July 21st 18, 11:23 AM posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,sci.space.history,alt.survival,sac.politics,uk.politics.misc
abelard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default NASA still trying to prove the moon landing wasn't faked.

On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:13:52 +0100, johnny-knowall
wrote:

On 21 Jul 2018, Gunner Asch wrote
(in article ):

Vidcapper wrote on 7/21/2018 2:29 AM:
On 21/07/2018 02:58, Bradley K. Shurman wrote:
Image 24 where there is no disturbance of the "moon" dirt from a
rocket engine firing.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/scien...-moon-landing-
photos-Apollo-11-pictures-Neil-Armstrong

NASA don't have to prove anything - it is the idiotic conspiracy
theorists job to try & prove their case - which they can't, as all
their claims are easily debunked.


Please watch the landing video in the link.

The camera was shooting at the landing ground on the moon surface while
the lander was descending. They forgot to add flying moon dust in the
Hollywood studio.

Pay attention to the landing site when the camera was shooting at the
moon surface. There is no flying moon dust or exhaust smoke from the
rocket engine.


Wasnt that because the lander had very little fuel, and Armstrong was
guiding it down like an aircraft using his own skill and experience? They
needed to save some fuel for the take off again, or they would have been
stuck there.

Im sure that is what he said on an interview many years ago.


you do realise that there are no such things as aeroplanes...all the
'reports' are fake news designed to make the politicians look good
and to give handouts to so-called pilots...

My name is Mark Wieber the shameless ass.

My friends call me the baddest lying ass in Taft.

I love to trash the socialist system that saved my life.

I don't pay my hospital bills, rent & taxes, and I feel no shame.

Mark Wieber (Gunner Asch) - self employed "Coyote Engineering" scrapper.
https://picasaweb.google.com/1040422...22097241260450

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



--
www.abelard.org
  #4  
Old July 21st 18, 11:56 AM posted to rec.crafts.metalworking, sci.space.history, alt.survival, sac.politics, uk.politics.misc
johnny-knowall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default NASA still trying to prove the moon landing wasn't faked.

On 21 Jul 2018, abelard wrote
(in ):

On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:13:52 +0100,
wrote:

On 21 Jul 2018, Gunner Asch wrote
(in article ):

Vidcapper wrote on 7/21/2018 2:29 AM:
On 21/07/2018 02:58, Bradley K. Shurman wrote:
Image 24 where there is no disturbance of the "moon" dirt from a
rocket engine firing.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/scien...-moon-landing-
photos-Apollo-11-pictures-Neil-Armstrong

NASA don't have to prove anything - it is the idiotic conspiracy
theorists job to try & prove their case - which they can't, as all
their claims are easily debunked.

Please watch the landing video in the link.

The camera was shooting at the landing ground on the moon surface while
the lander was descending. They forgot to add flying moon dust in the
Hollywood studio.

Pay attention to the landing site when the camera was shooting at the
moon surface. There is no flying moon dust or exhaust smoke from the
rocket engine.


Wasn’t that because the lander had very little fuel, and Armstrong was
guiding it down like an aircraft using his own skill and experience? They
needed to save some fuel for the take off again, or they would have been
stuck there.

I’m sure that is what he said on an interview many years ago.


you do realise that there are no such things as aeroplanes...all the
'reports' are fake news designed to make the politicians look good
and to give handouts to so-called pilots...


But if there are no aircraft, what kind of flying contraption is creating all
those novichok trails in the sky?


  #5  
Old July 21st 18, 11:57 AM posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,sci.space.history,alt.survival,sac.politics,uk.politics.misc
abelard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default NASA still trying to prove the moon landing wasn't faked.

On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:56:09 +0100, johnny-knowall
wrote:

On 21 Jul 2018, abelard wrote
(in ):

On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:13:52 +0100,
wrote:

On 21 Jul 2018, Gunner Asch wrote
(in article ):

Vidcapper wrote on 7/21/2018 2:29 AM:
On 21/07/2018 02:58, Bradley K. Shurman wrote:
Image 24 where there is no disturbance of the "moon" dirt from a
rocket engine firing.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/scien...-moon-landing-
photos-Apollo-11-pictures-Neil-Armstrong

NASA don't have to prove anything - it is the idiotic conspiracy
theorists job to try & prove their case - which they can't, as all
their claims are easily debunked.

Please watch the landing video in the link.

The camera was shooting at the landing ground on the moon surface while
the lander was descending. They forgot to add flying moon dust in the
Hollywood studio.

Pay attention to the landing site when the camera was shooting at the
moon surface. There is no flying moon dust or exhaust smoke from the
rocket engine.

Wasnt that because the lander had very little fuel, and Armstrong was
guiding it down like an aircraft using his own skill and experience? They
needed to save some fuel for the take off again, or they would have been
stuck there.

Im sure that is what he said on an interview many years ago.


you do realise that there are no such things as aeroplanes...all the
'reports' are fake news designed to make the politicians look good
and to give handouts to so-called pilots...


But if there are no aircraft, what kind of flying contraption is creating all
those novichok trails in the sky?


it's all done with lasers and fake film


--
www.abelard.org
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US moon landing FAKED? Photo of astronaut's visor 'PROVES NASA staged Apollo 17 mission' David Fritz History 14 November 21st 17 11:36 AM
NASA Faked Moon Landing, Period. Wretch Fossil Astronomy Misc 9 May 7th 12 07:01 PM
Updated Proof: NASA Faked Moon Landing, Period. Wretch Fossil Amateur Astronomy 1 May 5th 12 06:56 PM
NASA Faked Moon Landing, Period. Wretch Fossil Policy 1 May 5th 12 02:41 PM
If the moon landing was faked... PowerPost2000 History 123 August 3rd 06 03:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.