|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
At which altitudes do visible satellites orbit?
Ted Molczan wrote:
"Clay Blankenship" wrote in message ... Fred wrote: A lot of meteorological (and other?) satellites are at about 800-850 km, in the range necessary for sun-sychronous polar orbits (every ascending or descending Equator crossing is at the same local time). For example, all the NOAA polar orbiters and the DMSP satellites. The orbital planes of sun-synchronous orbits precess at the rate of +0.9856 deg/d, negating the -0.9856 deg/d precession due to Earth's orbit about the sun. The rate of precession of an orbital plane is a strong function of orbital inclination, semi-major axis and eccentricity, in that order. As a result, sun-synchronous orbits can be achieved over a wide range of altitudes. Generally, the greater the altitude, the greater the inclination required to be sun-synchronous. This affords satellite designers considerable flexibility to tailor orbits to specific missions. Here are some examples of the diversity among sun-synchronous orbits: You are right--I was misremembering that sun-synchronous orbits needed to be in a fairly tight altitude range. In fact, the inclination is the variable that is more tightly restricted (assuming low-earth orbit). I know a lot of polar-orbiting weather satellites are at around 800 km. I suppose there is a good tradeoff between fuel requirements, sensor ground resolution, and other factors there. Clay -- Clay Blankenship Change 'Z' to 's' to reply Monterey, CA |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
At which altitudes do visible satellites orbit?
Ted Molczan wrote:
"Clay Blankenship" wrote in message ... Fred wrote: A lot of meteorological (and other?) satellites are at about 800-850 km, in the range necessary for sun-sychronous polar orbits (every ascending or descending Equator crossing is at the same local time). For example, all the NOAA polar orbiters and the DMSP satellites. The orbital planes of sun-synchronous orbits precess at the rate of +0.9856 deg/d, negating the -0.9856 deg/d precession due to Earth's orbit about the sun. The rate of precession of an orbital plane is a strong function of orbital inclination, semi-major axis and eccentricity, in that order. As a result, sun-synchronous orbits can be achieved over a wide range of altitudes. Generally, the greater the altitude, the greater the inclination required to be sun-synchronous. This affords satellite designers considerable flexibility to tailor orbits to specific missions. Here are some examples of the diversity among sun-synchronous orbits: You are right--I was misremembering that sun-synchronous orbits needed to be in a fairly tight altitude range. In fact, the inclination is the variable that is more tightly restricted (assuming low-earth orbit). I know a lot of polar-orbiting weather satellites are at around 800 km. I suppose there is a good tradeoff between fuel requirements, sensor ground resolution, and other factors there. Clay -- Clay Blankenship Change 'Z' to 's' to reply Monterey, CA |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt | hermesnines | Astronomy Misc | 10 | February 27th 04 02:14 AM |
Saw a NOSS triad this evening... | Jim Jones | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | August 29th 03 07:02 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |
Incontrovertible Evidence | Cash | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | August 24th 03 07:22 PM |