|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Inertial Frames of Reference
So anyway..I am wondering why we go weightless in a free falling elevator
when the elevator leaves us behind. If we are in the same reference frame, why does that elevator frame take off....leaving us behind weightless? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Inertial Frames of Reference
"Mickman" wrote:
So anyway..I am wondering why we go weightless in a free falling elevator when the elevator leaves us behind. Elevators don't leave their occupants behind. If they did, elevators would not be a good way to get from floor to floor. Nor do you go weightless. You might if the elevator went into free fall, but there are safety mechanisms that prevent elevators from going into free fall. If we are in the same reference frame, why does that elevator frame take off....leaving us behind weightless? You momentarily weigh less as the elevator accelerates downward, then you momentarily weigh more as the elevator comes to a downward stop. In between those two periods of acceleration, while the elevator has constant velocity--i.e., zero acceleration--you weigh the same as you do standing on the ground outside the building. -- Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Inertial Frames of Reference
On Dec 14, 12:20 am, Dave Typinski wrote:
Nor do you go weightless. You might if the elevator went into free fall, but there are safety mechanisms that prevent elevators from going into free fall. He wasn't talking about real-world Otis safety elevators. He was talking about gedanken experiment elevators. So this won't help answering his question. John Savard |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Inertial Frames of Reference
On Dec 13, 11:57 pm, "Mickman" wrote:
So anyway..I am wondering why we go weightless in a free falling elevator when the elevator leaves us behind. If we are in the same reference frame, why does that elevator frame take off....leaving us behind weightless? Oh, no. The elevator is weightless too. I mean, it's not weightless from the outside, where we see it's falling. But the elevator is freely falling, so it's in a reference frame where it isn't sitting on anything that pushes against it to hold it up. The person in the elevator is judging his reference frame by the walls of the elevator. So, like the elevator, he has no weight on his feet; whatever pull gravity has on him, the elevator's downward movement fully coresponds to. John Savard |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Inertial Frames of Reference
Quadibloc wrote:
On Dec 13, 11:57 pm, "Mickman" wrote: So anyway..I am wondering why we go weightless in a free falling elevator when the elevator leaves us behind. If we are in the same reference frame why does that elevator frame take off....leaving us behind weightless? Oh, no. The elevator is weightless too. I mean, it's not weightless from the outside, where we see it's falling. But the elevator is freely falling, so it's in a reference frame where it isn't sitting on anything that pushes against it to hold it up. The person in the elevator is judging his reference frame by the walls of the elevator. So, like the elevator, he has no weight on his feet; whatever pull gravity has on him, the elevator's downward movement fully coresponds to. Okay, thought experiment it is. The elevator does not take off and leave the occupant behind. if it did, then the occupant would eventually hit the top of the elevator, at which time the occupant would no longer seem weightless. The top of the elevator would be pushing down on the occupant. The elevator takes off downward with the same acceleration that the occupant takes off downward. The elevator's acceleration under the force of gravity is the same is at its occupant's. Heavier objects do not fall faster than lighter objects. If the elevator and occupant accelerated at different rates, then yes, the elevator and the occupant would not share a common interial frame of reference with respect to each other. But they do, so they do. One might imagine what happens while a Russian doll is in free fall after being dropped. Ignoring the aerodynamic drag on the outer piece, all the pieces are in free fall at exactly the same acceleration. -- Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Inertial Frames of Reference
Mickman wrote: So anyway..I am wondering why we go weightless in a free falling elevator when the elevator leaves us behind. You arent weightless. You are still on the Earth last time I looked. Maybe its your imagination? (and CAA education!). Chck it out with Dick Bloviator at CAA's famous "I know everthang" website. http://cedar-astronomers.org/yahoo/Bloviation Jerry If we are in the same reference frame, why does that elevator frame take off....leaving us behind weightless? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fallacious Notion of Inertial Reference Frames in Relativity | GSS | Astronomy Misc | 10 | January 25th 08 03:22 PM |
About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones | GSS | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 15th 07 02:12 PM |
About frames moving at constant velocity with respect to inertial ones | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | August 13th 07 09:27 AM |
Interstitial Bodies & Reference Frames in SR | Lester Zick | Astronomy Misc | 179 | January 17th 07 10:09 AM |
Eve: The Mother Of All Inertial Frames | Gerald L. O'Barr | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 13th 05 08:27 AM |