#11
|
|||
|
|||
Gravity.
Weatherlawyer wrote: oriel36 wrote A great documentary on BBC yesterday centering on climate concerns and how things have changed and are changing rapidly as CO2 levels and temperatures rise. No there wasn't it was arrogant nonsense. That attenburger is full of ****, as are you. In case you don't know it, the state of reasearch into Carbon Dioxide in the air has shown a drop of several hundreds of thousands of parts per million since I was taught fzzzzix. Must be stored in all that lizard **** in the cool interior of the earth. It is unfortunate that astronomers are still assigning variable axial tilt to the Earth to explain hemispherical weather patterns because Name one doing that. As far as I know the only person who is utilising this method to forecast earthquakes as for example this recent disaster, is a bank clerk or some such. His methods (which incidentally seem to hinge on the same wabble as the one I am presuming you are talking ******** about) concerns the show that the sun throws on a wall from a ladder firmly attached to it top and bottom. The position it should reach -as opposed to the position it does reach, is compared to similar dates for quakes and the degree of the match indicates the degree of severity. He does not even subscribe to the belief it is caused by earth wabble as far as I understand. He ascribes it to magma raising or lowering his observatory. Whatever his mistakes, you can not fault his successes. The man is a genius, you on the other hand are a verbose fool. My methods, although dissimilar, employ what might also be seen as an effect of the earth's wabble. And as it happens, this disaster did indeed strike at a time anyone following my creed should have been alert to it. What can cause a severe earthquake (normaly of the magitude of some 7+) is when a run of rainy weather in the UK is replaced by a spell of dry. This can be forecast using simpe astronomical tables -in fact just the times of the phases. a time that divides nicely by three, gives low, cloudy weather; prone to fogs and frosts. And huricanes in the southern end of the North Atlantic in their season are most often seen in such runs. (For example there will be one due in some 2 weeks time when the phase on the 11th of June is at 18:03) (As that time is also divisible by 6, it indicates a dull spell as opposed to a thundery one.) Until then, the times of the phases divided by three leave a ramainder of 2 1/2 and 2 hours respectively giving us anticyclonic weather. It is the breaking of this run of spells that might induce a lurch in the wabble if such can be done. As is the case with the recent quake we are about to change or have already changed from a long spell of wet weather. I have shown you mine, now you show me yours. Or **** off. Look at what is actually occuring - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...easonearth.png Either go crazy or get it right,the Earth's orbital motion causes the orientation to change against fixed axial orientation,then and only then can you consider hemispherical seasons as a meteorological convenience. I do not need lawyers,I need men who are intelligent enough to recognise what is moving and what is not.So far,you fail and if you understand seasons through a variable tilting Earth then I strongly suggest you take up stamp collecting or gardening where you can do no harm. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro] Astrophysics (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (4/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:34 PM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Welcome! - read this first | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 9 | February 2nd 06 01:37 AM |
Gravity Vs inertia. | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 4 | January 22nd 06 02:10 AM |
[sci.astro] Astrophysics (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (4/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 6th 05 02:36 AM |
Gravity as Falling Space | Henry Haapalainen | Science | 1 | September 4th 04 04:08 PM |