|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
new scope...how perfect should I expect it to be?
About 5 years ago I bought a TV Pronto and I bought a TV 102 a couple of
years ago. In both cases the optics and the fit and finish were absolutely perfect, which may have led me to be a bit more critical about optical and mechanical fit and finish standards. I was looking for a very, very portable 8in SCT and I thought the NexStar 8i XLT would be perfect for me for use going up and down the stairs in my apartment (no elevator). Well it arrived and I can't decide if I should pack it up for a refund or give it a chance. I've only had 3 clear nights since the end of November, so I'm not sure how soon I can test it under the stars. Here's the letter I sent Celestron support and I'm wondering if I'm over-reacting and most SCTs ship in such a state or if I really got an unreasonably bad example. How clean should I expect an SCT to be? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "I bought the NexStar 8i for two main reasons...it's a very portable 8in SCT and I thought Celestron took pride in their craftsmanship and attention to detail given the "hand figuring" of the optics. When I unpacked the telescope, it was literally covered in glass dust. On the base it was as if someone poured half of a salt shaker out on it. After cleaning that, I proceeded to check the optics with a flashlight. 1. There is a large grease or paint smear inside the baffle tube. 2. There is dust and small pieces of hair on the inside of the corrector plate and on the mirror in addition to the moderate amount of dust on the outside of the corrector plate. 3. There are multiple circular streaks and a horizontal streak where someone rubbed the mirror with (I assume) a cloth. The mirror does not appear to be scratched and I don't know how much performance will be lost due to this utter lack of professionalism in letting the scope leave your factory in such a condition. How did this telescope make it out of your factory in such a condition and what is your explanation for the total lack of quality control? I await your response before I pack it up and send it back to Astronomics for a full refund and move on to Meade." -------------------------------------------------------------------- Any input would be appreciated. I fear that if I spend more money on an LX90 I will lose out on the extreme portability and may end up with the same fit and finish problems. Thanks! -- Clear Skies, Paul Murphy (remove gemini to email me) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
new scope...how perfect should I expect it to be?
Paul Murphy wrote: Here's the letter I sent Celestron support and I'm wondering if I'm over-reacting and most SCTs ship in such a state or if I really got an unreasonably bad example. How clean should I expect an SCT to be? You often will see lots more than will matter with the flashlight test. That said, I don't think you are overeacting. Re "3. There are multiple circular streaks and a horizontal streak where someone rubbed the mirror with (I assume) a cloth.", perhaps that is part of the "hand figuring"! The Nexstar8GPS I bought in 2003 was very clean .. only problem was that the corrector was scratched due to a loose lens cap in shipping; that made me inspect it carefully and it was pretty much immaculate. I took it to Celestron (10 minute drive for me) and had them fix it. [The bad news is that there are never good skies 10 minutes from Celestron!]. However, I wonder if any of what you describe would really affect optical performance. I would worry more about "When I unpacked the telescope, it was literally covered in glass dust. On the base it was as if someone poured half of a salt shaker out on it." indicating a *total* lack of inspection before shipping. What else, less visible, slipped through, in the drives, for example. Phil |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
new scope...how perfect should I expect it to be?
I'd ask for either a totaly refund and THEY pay return shipping or demand a
clean replacement and they pay shipping for BOTH scopes both ways. -- The Lone Sidewalk Astronomer of Rosamond Telescope Buyers FAQ http://home.inreach.com/starlord Astronomy Net Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/astronomy_net In Garden Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/ingarden Blast Off Online Gift Shop http://www.cafepress.com/starlords "Paul Murphy" wrote in message .. . About 5 years ago I bought a TV Pronto and I bought a TV 102 a couple of years ago. In both cases the optics and the fit and finish were absolutely perfect, which may have led me to be a bit more critical about optical and mechanical fit and finish standards. I was looking for a very, very portable 8in SCT and I thought the NexStar 8i XLT would be perfect for me for use going up and down the stairs in my apartment (no elevator). Well it arrived and I can't decide if I should pack it up for a refund or give it a chance. I've only had 3 clear nights since the end of November, so I'm not sure how soon I can test it under the stars. Here's the letter I sent Celestron support and I'm wondering if I'm over-reacting and most SCTs ship in such a state or if I really got an unreasonably bad example. How clean should I expect an SCT to be? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "I bought the NexStar 8i for two main reasons...it's a very portable 8in SCT and I thought Celestron took pride in their craftsmanship and attention to detail given the "hand figuring" of the optics. When I unpacked the telescope, it was literally covered in glass dust. On the base it was as if someone poured half of a salt shaker out on it. After cleaning that, I proceeded to check the optics with a flashlight. 1. There is a large grease or paint smear inside the baffle tube. 2. There is dust and small pieces of hair on the inside of the corrector plate and on the mirror in addition to the moderate amount of dust on the outside of the corrector plate. 3. There are multiple circular streaks and a horizontal streak where someone rubbed the mirror with (I assume) a cloth. The mirror does not appear to be scratched and I don't know how much performance will be lost due to this utter lack of professionalism in letting the scope leave your factory in such a condition. How did this telescope make it out of your factory in such a condition and what is your explanation for the total lack of quality control? I await your response before I pack it up and send it back to Astronomics for a full refund and move on to Meade." -------------------------------------------------------------------- Any input would be appreciated. I fear that if I spend more money on an LX90 I will lose out on the extreme portability and may end up with the same fit and finish problems. Thanks! -- Clear Skies, Paul Murphy (remove gemini to email me) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
new scope...how perfect should I expect it to be?
I think you've pretty much described, for a picky person, the
difference between Televue and Celestron. Oh yeah, you might as well skip Meade, too... rat ~( ); |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
new scope...how perfect should I expect it to be?
Paul Murphy wrote:
snip Here's the letter I sent Celestron support and I'm wondering if I'm over-reacting and most SCTs ship in such a state or if I really got an unreasonably bad example. How clean should I expect an SCT to be? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "[...] How did this telescope make it out of your factory in such a condition and what is your explanation for the total lack of quality control? I await your response before I pack it up and send it back to Astronomics for a full refund and move on to Meade." -------------------------------------------------------------------- I think it a little intemperate to threaten them with the competition in your initial letter. Although your disappointment sounds quite justified, if you present yourself as expecting to get nothing less than the prompt and fair response you deserve, you'll be less likely to provoke defensive stonewalling or buck-passing. So I'd have reserved the aggressive stance for replying to a potentially unsatisfactory response. -- Odysseus |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
new scope...how perfect should I expect it to be?
Hi,
I am sorry to hear that you received a scope in such poor shape. I would definitely demand an exchange. As an aside, I purchased a C11S-GT a few months ago and yersterday received a N8i-SE and they both came in virtually perfect shape. I also once owned a Meade 8" LX200GPS which also came in great condition. There is hope!! Hopefully, you will get things worked out. jeff |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
new scope...how perfect should I expect it to be?
"Paul Murphy" wrote in message .. .
snip Any input would be appreciated. I fear that if I spend more money on an LX90 I will lose out on the extreme portability and may end up with the same fit and finish problems. Thanks! Return it for an exchange or refund. -- Hilton Evans --------------------------------------------------------------- Lon -71° 04' 35.3" Lat +42° 11' 06.7" --------------------------------------------------------------- Webcam Astroimaging http://mysite.verizon.net/hiltonevan...troimaging.htm --------------------------------------------------------------- ChemPen Chemical Structure Software http://www.chempensoftware.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
new scope...how perfect should I expect it to be?
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:37:36 -0800, rat ~( ); wrote:
I think you've pretty much described, for a picky person, the difference between Televue and Celestron. Oh yeah, you might as well skip Meade, too... rat ~( ); Hmmm, I think I'm about as pessimistic and sceptical as most folks get and I was thrilled with the state in which my Meade arrived. The "fit and finish" of the styrofoam packing material was excellent, the scope and accesories looked like they'd never been touched by human hands. After a couple of weeks I discovered that the switch on the polar alignment reticle illuminator was broken. Meade replaced the entire alignment scope. I agree with the poster who said that there is hope. Tom R |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
new scope...how perfect should I expect it to be?
Return it.... Not sue BUT I do not see it leaving the factory in the condition you state...BUT who knows what can happen between the factory and the dealer and betweeeen the dealer and you... BUT return it... refund? opr replacement? your choice.. I do own a 8i have for a l;oittle over 2 years BUT I picked it up from the dealer saw it unwrapped..saw it checked out, saw it bench tested optics checked etc...then re-boxed it and put int in my truck... Been a Great scope...and like you I purchased it because at 36-37 pounds "complete" on the tripod This 60+ year old fart can haul the scope anyplace and set it up without any problems... I'm lucky in that My dealer is fantastic...and is located only an hour drive away...and they scheck out every scope before they deliver it to the customer. Send it back... ! Bob G.. On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:43:23 GMT, Paul Murphy wrote: About 5 years ago I bought a TV Pronto and I bought a TV 102 a couple of years ago. In both cases the optics and the fit and finish were absolutely perfect, which may have led me to be a bit more critical about optical and mechanical fit and finish standards. I was looking for a very, very portable 8in SCT and I thought the NexStar 8i XLT would be perfect for me for use going up and down the stairs in my apartment (no elevator). Well it arrived and I can't decide if I should pack it up for a refund or give it a chance. I've only had 3 clear nights since the end of November, so I'm not sure how soon I can test it under the stars. Here's the letter I sent Celestron support and I'm wondering if I'm over-reacting and most SCTs ship in such a state or if I really got an unreasonably bad example. How clean should I expect an SCT to be? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "I bought the NexStar 8i for two main reasons...it's a very portable 8in SCT and I thought Celestron took pride in their craftsmanship and attention to detail given the "hand figuring" of the optics. When I unpacked the telescope, it was literally covered in glass dust. On the base it was as if someone poured half of a salt shaker out on it. After cleaning that, I proceeded to check the optics with a flashlight. 1. There is a large grease or paint smear inside the baffle tube. 2. There is dust and small pieces of hair on the inside of the corrector plate and on the mirror in addition to the moderate amount of dust on the outside of the corrector plate. 3. There are multiple circular streaks and a horizontal streak where someone rubbed the mirror with (I assume) a cloth. The mirror does not appear to be scratched and I don't know how much performance will be lost due to this utter lack of professionalism in letting the scope leave your factory in such a condition. How did this telescope make it out of your factory in such a condition and what is your explanation for the total lack of quality control? I await your response before I pack it up and send it back to Astronomics for a full refund and move on to Meade." -------------------------------------------------------------------- Any input would be appreciated. I fear that if I spend more money on an LX90 I will lose out on the extreme portability and may end up with the same fit and finish problems. Thanks! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
new scope...how perfect should I expect it to be?
Tom Rauschenbach wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:37:36 -0800, rat ~( ); wrote: I think you've pretty much described, for a picky person, the difference between Televue and Celestron. Oh yeah, you might as well skip Meade, too... rat ~( ); I took a look at the telescope in daylight for the first time and the mirror looks perfect, except for some dust. Whatever was wiped across the mirror is only visible under direct illumination with a flashlight. (I take it Celestron doesn't inspect its scopes in a dark room with a flashlight...) I talked to Astronomics and they said that the flashlight test in a dark room was a very difficult test for any SCT and even their Questar MCTs usually have dust and swirl marks visible under a flashlight. I'll leave the issues logged with Celestron and Astronomics just in case and I'll at least give it a try under the stars to see how it does. I think I'll stick to buying scopes from a local dealer and inspect them on the spot from now on. I now appreciate the time and care that went into my two refractors a bit more. -- Clear Skies, Paul Murphy (remove gemini to email me) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Meade 80mm Model 312 scope | Allan Adler | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | November 24th 04 07:38 AM |
second scope - which one? Orion ShortTube 4.5 EQ or SkyQuest XT 4.5 | Jim Fedina | Amateur Astronomy | 15 | November 16th 04 01:41 PM |
telescope newby question 101 | troll hunter | UK Astronomy | 12 | May 21st 04 09:23 PM |
Titan | Martin R. Howell | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | March 9th 04 09:44 PM |
SMALL SCOPE + NICE BACKYARD = ENJOYABLE NIGHT! | David Knisely | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | October 27th 03 09:55 AM |