|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
TPS question. Open cell mandatory?
The STS reference manual said that one of the things which makes the
shuttle tile so effective is that their structure allows "internal re- radiation" of heat between different parts of the tile. It also said the production method results in an open cell structure. My question is twofold. Firstly does anybody know if this effect exists with closed cell ceramic structures or can it only works because each individual cell is a skelton rather than a full bubble? I know Aerojet pitched closed cell ceramic foams and I believe they were rejected on weight grounds (s.g of .34). These foams are readily available in Europe as construction materials. They are fire rated to at least 1 hr (believe this would be 1600c, but I have never seen a temp spec on the std) and lightweight grades are down to s.g. of .17, with a crush strength of 6atm. However I wonder if they popcorn if the pressure difference or the rate of change of the pressure difference (preventing pressure equalising between the cells and the environment) is too high. Thanks in advance for any help. Steve |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mirror cell | Dennis Allen | Amateur Astronomy | 7 | December 29th 05 07:52 AM |
Foam Open or Closed Cell? | TC | Space Shuttle | 8 | August 6th 05 03:22 PM |
CELL.EXE? | Lawrence Sayre | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | April 9th 04 05:23 PM |
PLOP mirror cell program question | Lawrence Sayre | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | April 4th 04 11:39 PM |
Fuel Cell question | Alan Erskine | Space Shuttle | 8 | February 17th 04 07:43 PM |