#1
|
|||
|
|||
astrophotography
Could some kind person please direct me to where I can read up about
transferring video clips from the camcorder to computer prior to processing with registax? I want to prepare myself before buying a camcorder. Tips on what sort of camcorder to buy would also be very welcome. Thanks Norman |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
astrophotography
Norman Silverstone wrote: Could some kind person please direct me to where I can read up about transferring video clips from the camcorder to computer prior to processing with registax? I want to prepare myself before buying a camcorder. Tips on what sort of camcorder to buy would also be very welcome. What for, if I may ask? Videorecorders and astrophotography is not a marriage made in heaven (pun intended). Andrea T. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
astrophotography
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
astrophotography
Could some kind person please direct me to where I can read up about transferring video clips from the camcorder to computer prior to processing with registax? I want to prepare myself before buying a camcorder. Tips on what sort of camcorder to buy would also be very welcome. snip To the OP: atasselli is essentially right, video cameras are pretty unlikely to work as they're designed for much higher light densities. You could be correct but is this fact or just your opinion. I know very little about digital photography and I would appreciate some references so that I can read and understand. Norman Many webcams, especially the Toucam pro, will however give useful results if what you're after is lots of stills for stacking. This would be my intention. However, would I not have to connect a webcam to a computer for it to work and, as I am looking to astronomy, does this not mean a laptop computer which I do not possess. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
astrophotography
This would be my intention. However, would I not have to connect a webcam to a computer for it to work and, as I am looking to astronomy, does this not mean a laptop computer which I do not possess. For the cost of a decent video camera, you could have the laptop and webcam easily, probably for a lot less. This set up is generally the one used by most planetary astrophotography. You may also have difficulty finding an appropriate adapter for a video camera. Such adapters are easily found for webcams though. Converting video frames to something that can be stacked and processed for astrphotography still drives the need for a computer. Scott |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
astrophotography
This would be my intention. However, would I not have to connect a webcam to a computer for it to work and, as I am looking to astronomy, does this not mean a laptop computer which I do not possess. For the cost of a decent video camera, you could have the laptop and webcam easily, probably for a lot less. This set up is generally the one used by most planetary astrophotography. You may also have difficulty finding an appropriate adapter for a video camera. Such adapters are easily found for webcams though. Converting video frames to something that can be stacked and processed for astrphotography still drives the need for a computer. Thanks for that and I do understand the need for a computer which I already have but it is a desktop. Also I wonder if one would need such an expensive camcorder. My intention, initially anyway, would be to work afocally thereby needed only a relatively simple bracket arrangement such as I have already used for still photography. Norman |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
astrophotography
"Norman Silverstone" wrote in message news Could some kind person please direct me to where I can read up about transferring video clips from the camcorder to computer prior to processing with registax? I want to prepare myself before buying a camcorder. Tips on what sort of camcorder to buy would also be very welcome. You can buy video capture devices which allow you to convert a composite video signal into an AVI file. This is a link to a PCI card version:- http://www.mediaatlantic.com/product.php/69476/75/ Other versions are available for USB. I have a USB product which works very well. Unfortunately, I cannot remember the manufacturer's name. I am sure that PC World sell them. You might also find them in Curry's or other similiar outlets. Regards Donal -- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
astrophotography
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:34:20 +0100, in uk.sci.astronomy , Norman
Silverstone wrote: Thanks for that and I do understand the need for a computer which I already have but it is a desktop. Also I wonder if one would need such an expensive camcorder. I think the point people are making is that camcorders are no good. If you want to take lots of shots for stacking, use a webcam such as the Phillips Toucam pro which can be had, including adapter for telescope, for around £100. You can then xfer the 'video' footage to a PC and use Registax or similar to stack the frames. My intention, initially anyway, would be to work afocally thereby needed only a relatively simple bracket arrangement such as I have already used for still photography. It might work. My own experience with a webcam was that it was much much easier to do it with even a simple adapter into the eyepiece holder. -- Mark McIntyre |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
astrophotography
Norman Silverstone wrote: This would be my intention. However, would I not have to connect a webcam to a computer for it to work and, as I am looking to astronomy, does this not mean a laptop computer which I do not possess. For the cost of a decent video camera, you could have the laptop and webcam easily, probably for a lot less. This set up is generally the one used by most planetary astrophotography. You may also have difficulty finding an appropriate adapter for a video camera. Such adapters are easily found for webcams though. Converting video frames to something that can be stacked and processed for astrphotography still drives the need for a computer. Thanks for that and I do understand the need for a computer which I already have but it is a desktop. Also I wonder if one would need such an expensive camcorder. My intention, initially anyway, would be to work afocally thereby needed only a relatively simple bracket arrangement such as I have already used for still photography. Even with the best camrecorders I've seen so far (semi-pro 3CCD type) the results for planetary work do not hold a half a candle to a webcam based system and the total expenditure is far higher. You can get a decent used laptop and a Toucam for, probably, little over £200 if you shop wisely. Andrea T. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
astrophotography
, snip
I think the point people are making is that camcorders are no good. snip My thanks to everyone for such useful information, it is much appreciated. I will now sit down and try to make up my mind Norman |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Meade LX90-LNT or Celestron C8-SGT for DSO Astrophotography ? | Nuno | UK Astronomy | 7 | April 6th 05 08:41 AM |
For Sale: Nikon CoolPix 5000 Astrophotography Setup | Mike Schriber | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 20th 04 01:02 AM |
Digital vs. Film in Astrophotography | Jason Donahue | Amateur Astronomy | 216 | January 5th 04 04:34 PM |
Digital vs. Film in Astrophotography | Jason Donahue | CCD Imaging | 35 | January 5th 04 03:11 PM |
Astrophotography telescope for amateur photographer | brulu | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | August 7th 03 03:54 AM |