|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Moon was produced by head-on collision?
The Starmaker wrote:
Michael Moroney wrote: The Starmaker writes: Michael Moroney wrote: Babbling nonsense. Read up on the water cycle. Water drawn up in plants (by the sun as part of photosynthesis, not the moon) is a minor component of the water cycle. What is "a minor component of the water cycle."? Are you talking about the moon as being "a minor component of the water cycle."? Can't you read? I said that plant transpiration of water (caused by the sun) is a minor component. The moon is irrelevant, the words "moon" and "tide" aren't even used in the Wikipedia article on the water cycle. The moon isn't mentioned in a long USGS web page explaining the water cycle, "tide" is only because they explain the water table and wells by using the example of digging a hole at the beach which fills with water from the ocean (and is affected by tides). I see, you getting your information from a 'anonymous user-edited website'. That means you don't know much... https://www.google.com/#q=moon+tides&tbm=nws Here’s how it works: The moon’s gravitational pull causes Earth’s atmosphere to bulge toward it, (on both sides of the earth) .. this 'gravitational pull' by the moon pulls a drop of water from the leaf unto the ground. From the ground the drops of water 'pulled by the moon’s gravitational pull' from the leaves, the billions of leaves...form ruiing water on the ground that turns to rivers...that eventually form and...ocean. In other words... the earth's moon makes the ocean. All from a single drop of water on a leaf. http://revelwallpapers.net/d/7532364...ps-on-leaf.jpg Where do you think fishes come from? From leaves that fall from trees. Do you want me to explain How that works? Don't expect to find this information on a 'anonymous user-edited website' like Wikipedia. Why waste your time...read about it here from this first cover issue of Science magazine: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The...nal-2-abcd.jpg https://news.google.com/news/story?n...3ABI8QqgIIJDAB of course Science is a few thousand years behind... they still tryin to figure out how the Moon works. https://news.google.com/news/story?n...3ABI8QqgIIJDAB wait till they find out the moon makes fishes and people fall from trees: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The...nal-2-abcd.jpg man! yous guys are soooo behind the times. yous just don't get it. I think i was born tooo early.....let me come back a thousand years. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Moon was produced by head-on collision?
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote: Michael Moroney wrote: The Starmaker writes: Michael Moroney wrote: Babbling nonsense. Read up on the water cycle. Water drawn up in plants (by the sun as part of photosynthesis, not the moon) is a minor component of the water cycle. What is "a minor component of the water cycle."? Are you talking about the moon as being "a minor component of the water cycle."? Can't you read? I said that plant transpiration of water (caused by the sun) is a minor component. The moon is irrelevant, the words "moon" and "tide" aren't even used in the Wikipedia article on the water cycle. The moon isn't mentioned in a long USGS web page explaining the water cycle, "tide" is only because they explain the water table and wells by using the example of digging a hole at the beach which fills with water from the ocean (and is affected by tides). I see, you getting your information from a 'anonymous user-edited website'. That means you don't know much... https://www.google.com/#q=moon+tides&tbm=nws Here’s how it works: The moon’s gravitational pull causes Earth’s atmosphere to bulge toward it, (on both sides of the earth) .. this 'gravitational pull' by the moon pulls a drop of water from the leaf unto the ground. From the ground the drops of water 'pulled by the moon’s gravitational pull' from the leaves, the billions of leaves...form ruiing water on the ground that turns to rivers...that eventually form and...ocean. In other words... the earth's moon makes the ocean. All from a single drop of water on a leaf. http://revelwallpapers.net/d/7532364...ps-on-leaf.jpg Where do you think fishes come from? From leaves that fall from trees. Do you want me to explain How that works? Don't expect to find this information on a 'anonymous user-edited website' like Wikipedia. Why waste your time...read about it here from this first cover issue of Science magazine: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The...nal-2-abcd.jpg https://news.google.com/news/story?n...3ABI8QqgIIJDAB of course Science is a few thousand years behind... they still tryin to figure out how the Moon works. https://news.google.com/news/story?n...3ABI8QqgIIJDAB wait till they find out the moon makes fishes and people fall from trees: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The...nal-2-abcd.jpg man! yous guys are soooo behind the times. yous just don't get it. I think i was born tooo early.....let me come back a thousand years. what you people don't understand... is that the earth's moon is instrumental in the origin of the ocean the origin of fishes the origin of people the origin of Life on Earth. Simply by it's gravitational pull on the earth and it's atmosphere. What came first, the rain or the clouds? |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Moon was produced by head-on collision?
dlzc writes:
Dear Michael Moroney: On Saturday, February 6, 2016 at 6:28:38 PM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote: ... Babbling nonsense. The "jack in the box" keeps popping out, if you keep responding to it in the usual way. I am sure you know this, but he is artificially ignorant by choice. You may have boundless optimism that you can fix this condition, but he is consciously referencing biblical text, and picking and choosing which facts and observations support his position. If you manage to pull the rug entirely out from under him, he will be forced to fall back on literal interpretation of biblical works, since Science cannot save his soul. Your breath is wasted on his corpus. So if you enjoy watching the "jack in the box", keep on cranking... As I recently wrote in another thread, I like to argue with kooks. I find it entertaining. I know kooks like this one are incurable. In this case, I was also curious what kind of twisted "logic" it had to show how the moon caused rain. However, this particular kook isn't particularly entertaining, so I won't be turning this particular kook-in-the-box's crank for too much longer. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Moon was produced by head-on collision?
Dear Michael Moroney:
On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 7:58:45 PM UTC-7, Michael Moroney wrote: dlzc writes: As I recently wrote in another thread, I like to argue with kooks. I find it entertaining. I know kooks like this one are incurable. In this case, I was also curious what kind of twisted "logic" it had to show how the moon caused rain. However, this particular kook isn't particularly entertaining, so I won't be turning this particular kook-in-the-box's crank for too much longer. As long as you are aware, the furrow closes right behind your plow... and the weeds spring up anew. David A. Smith |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Moon was produced by head-on collision?
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote: The Starmaker wrote: Michael Moroney wrote: The Starmaker writes: Michael Moroney wrote: Babbling nonsense. Read up on the water cycle. Water drawn up in plants (by the sun as part of photosynthesis, not the moon) is a minor component of the water cycle. What is "a minor component of the water cycle."? Are you talking about the moon as being "a minor component of the water cycle."? Can't you read? I said that plant transpiration of water (caused by the sun) is a minor component. The moon is irrelevant, the words "moon" and "tide" aren't even used in the Wikipedia article on the water cycle. The moon isn't mentioned in a long USGS web page explaining the water cycle, "tide" is only because they explain the water table and wells by using the example of digging a hole at the beach which fills with water from the ocean (and is affected by tides). I see, you getting your information from a 'anonymous user-edited website'. That means you don't know much... https://www.google.com/#q=moon+tides&tbm=nws Here’s how it works: The moon’s gravitational pull causes Earth’s atmosphere to bulge toward it, (on both sides of the earth) .. this 'gravitational pull' by the moon pulls a drop of water from the leaf unto the ground. From the ground the drops of water 'pulled by the moon’s gravitational pull' from the leaves, the billions of leaves...form ruiing water on the ground that turns to rivers...that eventually form and...ocean. In other words... the earth's moon makes the ocean. All from a single drop of water on a leaf. http://revelwallpapers.net/d/7532364...ps-on-leaf.jpg Where do you think fishes come from? From leaves that fall from trees. Do you want me to explain How that works? Don't expect to find this information on a 'anonymous user-edited website' like Wikipedia. Why waste your time...read about it here from this first cover issue of Science magazine: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The...nal-2-abcd.jpg https://news.google.com/news/story?n...3ABI8QqgIIJDAB of course Science is a few thousand years behind... they still tryin to figure out how the Moon works. https://news.google.com/news/story?n...3ABI8QqgIIJDAB wait till they find out the moon makes fishes and people fall from trees: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The...nal-2-abcd.jpg man! yous guys are soooo behind the times. yous just don't get it. I think i was born tooo early.....let me come back a thousand years. what you people don't understand... is that the earth's moon is instrumental in the origin of the ocean the origin of fishes the origin of people the origin of Life on Earth. Simply by it's gravitational pull on the earth and it's atmosphere. What came first, the rain or the clouds? Of course the answer is simple...the moon made the clouds and then it made it rain. How did the moon make clouds? Instead of rainfall, it rainup. Sorry, I cannot wait for yous people to invent the word "rainup". Maybe a thousand years from now you'll figure it out....especially yous Wikipedia university students. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Moon was produced by head-on collision?
The Starmaker wrote:
The Starmaker wrote: The Starmaker wrote: The Starmaker wrote: Michael Moroney wrote: The Starmaker writes: Michael Moroney wrote: Babbling nonsense. Read up on the water cycle. Water drawn up in plants (by the sun as part of photosynthesis, not the moon) is a minor component of the water cycle. What is "a minor component of the water cycle."? Are you talking about the moon as being "a minor component of the water cycle."? Can't you read? I said that plant transpiration of water (caused by the sun) is a minor component. The moon is irrelevant, the words "moon" and "tide" aren't even used in the Wikipedia article on the water cycle. The moon isn't mentioned in a long USGS web page explaining the water cycle, "tide" is only because they explain the water table and wells by using the example of digging a hole at the beach which fills with water from the ocean (and is affected by tides). I see, you getting your information from a 'anonymous user-edited website'. That means you don't know much... https://www.google.com/#q=moon+tides&tbm=nws Here’s how it works: The moon’s gravitational pull causes Earth’s atmosphere to bulge toward it, (on both sides of the earth) .. this 'gravitational pull' by the moon pulls a drop of water from the leaf unto the ground. From the ground the drops of water 'pulled by the moon’s gravitational pull' from the leaves, the billions of leaves...form ruiing water on the ground that turns to rivers...that eventually form and...ocean. In other words... the earth's moon makes the ocean. All from a single drop of water on a leaf. http://revelwallpapers.net/d/7532364...ps-on-leaf.jpg Where do you think fishes come from? From leaves that fall from trees. Do you want me to explain How that works? Don't expect to find this information on a 'anonymous user-edited website' like Wikipedia. Why waste your time...read about it here from this first cover issue of Science magazine: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The...nal-2-abcd.jpg https://news.google.com/news/story?n...3ABI8QqgIIJDAB of course Science is a few thousand years behind... they still tryin to figure out how the Moon works. https://news.google.com/news/story?n...3ABI8QqgIIJDAB wait till they find out the moon makes fishes and people fall from trees: http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The...nal-2-abcd.jpg man! yous guys are soooo behind the times. yous just don't get it. I think i was born tooo early.....let me come back a thousand years. what you people don't understand... is that the earth's moon is instrumental in the origin of the ocean the origin of fishes the origin of people the origin of Life on Earth. Simply by it's gravitational pull on the earth and it's atmosphere. What came first, the rain or the clouds? Of course the answer is simple...the moon made the clouds and then it made it rain. How did the moon make clouds? Instead of rainfall, it rainup. Sorry, I cannot wait for yous people to invent the word "rainup". Maybe a thousand years from now you'll figure it out....especially yous Wikipedia university students. Now, as you see on the cover of the first issue of the Science Journal is shows a photograph of a leafinsect. http://pw1.netcom.com/~starmaker/The...nal-2-abcd.jpg You're problably wondering, how did the leaf that fell from a tree turn into an insect???? |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Moon was produced by head-on collision?
In article ,
Martin Brown writes: I am sceptical too but here is one source with references: http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~geerts/cwx/...ap10/moon.html I looked at the notes but not the references. They refer to single locations and limited periods of time, which makes me wonder about statistical significance. In any case, they can't tell us anything global. There is a more recent climate related paper claiming a statistically significant temperature to lunar phase correlation in satellite data but not rainfall. http://science.sciencemag.org/conten.../1481.abstract It isn't totally implausible since the Earth will be very slightly closer to the sun at full moon. The effect is tiny ~20mK I think Martin has nailed the cause, though the authors didn't. While the authors write "0.02 K" and "0.03 K" in the text -- and why they give two different values is unclear to me -- their Figure 1 (which I found in the pdf but not the html version) actually shows 10 mK difference. That's just the amount I estimate from the difference in solar distance as a function of lunar phase. I'm impressed that it can actually be measured. Another source quoted http://www.reportingclimatescience.c...-rainfall.html which is based on the refereed article at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...5GL067342/full This shows the expected semi-diurnal tidal effect on the atmosphere and correlates it with a tiny rainfall effect. The original claim was a monthly effect, which this paper doesn't address and about which I remain skeptical. By the way, it's not hard to compare the relative tidal forces on a raindrop from the Moon and from a nearby frog. The Moon is roughly three times denser than a frog, so if the Moon and the frog subtend the same angular diameter as seen from the raindrop, the Moon's tidal force will be three times larger. Move the frog 30% closer, and the tidal forces will be equal. (Tidal force goes as r^-1/3.) Of course both are utterly negligible for any practical purpose. -- Help keep our newsgroup healthy; please don't feed the trolls. Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chapt23 Earth Moon collision; Layered ages of the Cosmos and SolarSystem #395 Atom Totality 4th ed | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 20th 11 07:26 AM |
The Moon Alien's head! | Pat Flannery | History | 7 | October 22nd 06 12:06 PM |
Large mass produced dob | Big Al | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | August 23rd 06 07:39 PM |
Continents: the result of a Moon-forming collision? | Jim McCauley | Science | 2 | October 8th 05 03:55 PM |
cargo for mass produced EELV.s | steve rappolee | Technology | 1 | February 28th 04 08:45 PM |