link to "Dark Mission: the Secret History of NASA"

anyone can show me the link to this book "Dark Mission: the Secret
History of NASA"

On Nov 17, 6:46 pm, wrote:
anyone can show me the link to this book "Dark Mission: the Secret
History of NASA"

Welcome to Dark Mission.net
http://www.darkmission.net/dmframes.htm
Sadly, there is no other viable link, other than multiple sites
that'll gladly sell you a spendy book.

First off, I'm one of those honestly believing that some of our NASA/
Apollo robotics are somewhat hard-landed upon or at least having
impacted the moon, but that's about it. I also tend to believe that
our A13 mission made one quick though only partial orbit as a manned
accomplishment, because the whole world was so closely watching every
step of the way, and because they would have had the spare fuel for
just that sort of one-time-around accomplishment.

The only thing of any NASA/Apollo "Dark Mission" as representing any
"Secret History of NASA" would have to do with those pesky regular
laws of physics and best available planetology science as replicated
and peer reviewed matter of fact that our moon itself is on average
physically dark as coal. End of whatever argument against our NASA/
Apollo astronauts NOT having set any stinking moonboot foot on that
moon of ours. Of course, that sort of makes our warm and fuzzy Walter
Cronkite look pretty bad, as well as having to be a whole lot worse
off than merely dumbfounded, doesn't it.

Japan's Selene mission is already down to 10 meters per pixel in raw
image format, and it's only going to get better as other science is
obtained, especially when applied into a quality composite image
that'll allow us to see far more 3D depth, spectrum and detail than
any naked human eye. Unless our Boeing/Raytheon/TRW ABL cannon can
manage to blind or simply roast Selene's instruments, it's just a
matter of time, isn't it.

China and Japan are clearly not about to be taking another NASA no for
an answer, and that's why this kind of fresh and honestly revealing
look-see with further science and planetology measurements other than
pictures are being accomplished by other than our crack NASA wizards
that have to concentrate their best talents upon keeping those semitic
butt-cracks as tight and straight as possible.

Quite oddly there's hardly an honest Usenet word on behalf of the
Chinese moon exploration mission, that's closing in on what Japan
already has as an ongoing 3-satellite observation and science
gathering process, that'll each pick up the slack where the previous
US and Russian missions of mostly hocus pocus disinformation and/or
evidence exclusion left off.

However, once again and again, it's perfectly clear that our NASA/
Apollo brown-nosed clowns are running their very own Usenet of damage-
control infomercials fully amock, all because of those original NASA/
Apollo lies and subsequent denials of their being in denial, is simply
all too Hitler and/or GW Bush like.

And only because I'm still such a nice guy is why we even have this
following insignificant contribution by our very own "kT". But we
should take a little further notice as to how all the usenet lights
tend to go out whenever there's another not so insignificant speck of
truth about our moon to behold, especially when such doesn't in any
way support as to what those as "having the right stuff" were tilling
us to believe.

"Japan First Back To The Moon!" / kT
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...8a85929879b6a0
"Heh heh heh ... Go JAXA! Go Japan!"

I believe that basic though unusually simple topic entro by kT is
absolutely right on the money, at least Japan being of the first other
than Russian or those of our various lunar orbital missions, however
China is not exactly sitting on their extremely wise old butts, are
they.

Here's the latest HDTV images, except for having those moon surface
saturations of somewhat badly skewed color fully removed. In other
words, our moon is getting HDTV depicted as entirely color blind, as
limited to gray-sacle, and only Earth is getting artificially
accommodated in full living color.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071113_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_01l.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...kaguya_02l.jpg

Here's the first of their 20 and 10 meter resolution images, with
better than 10 meter resolution coming up next, and try to remember
that's prior to using any PhotoShop enlargement and subsequent
"unsharp" filter processing.
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/20071116_kaguya_e.html
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...i03bands_l.jpg
"Figure 2: Comparison between the KAGUYA TC image and the Clementine
image
You can see the comparison between the image taken by the KAGUYA TC
cut out from the TC's first image data (the area encircled by the
yellow dot square in Figure 1) and the image shot by the high aerial
resolution camera onboard the Clementine Satellite. In the TC camera
image, you can see that the smaller craters (10-90 meters in size) and
the minute structure of the inside of a crater."
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/11/img...uya_tc02_l.jpg

Here's those previously unfiltered original HDTV images that offered
the expected off-color saturation imposed tint, via all of that pesky
secondary or recoil worth of such a bluish/violet hue look-see at our
naked and thus unavoidably reactive moon (images 01 ~ 13):
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/20071021_kaguya_e.pdf
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_01.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_03.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_05.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_10.jpg
http://www.jaxa.jp/press/2007/10/img..._kaguya_11.jpg

Besides the matter of JAXA/NHK having only turned on their HDTV color
elements as for accommodating those selected pixels of Earth
(adjusting gamma to 4x alone gives us that sort of proof, or otherwise
by simply replacing their image black with most any other color),
though it's still every bit worth an as-is look-see for taking notice
as to how extremely dark and otherwise somewhat of an average coal
like 0.11 albedo or actually of a slightly sooty darker kind of dusty
deep soft lunar terrain of such minimal albedo, meaning that it's very
poorly reflective of the visible spectrum, as otherwise correctly
representing that which our extremely cosmic dusty and electrostatic
charged moon really is, as well as for having been so clearly HVTV
imaged w/o those pesky color saturations except for their
accommodating within the very same HDTV FOV as hosting a very colorful
Earth, as having been illuminated by the very same raw solar spectrum
that has unavoidably skewed the moon itself by the unfiltered and
subsequent excess amounts of those violet and UV photons, of which
CCDs are by rights extremely sensitive to.

Now then, and I'm being quite honestly serious about this next part;
do we see anything of that naked lunar terrain that's looking as
though being the least bit NASA/Apollo (65%~75% reflective) 0.65~0.075
albedo worthy, as though looking much like a certain guano island as
having been xenon arc lamp spectrum illuminated and otherwise
physically modified in order to suit their supposed moon look, on
behalf of those hocus-pocus Apollo landings? (silly loaded question,
as I didn't think so)

Now try to further imagine how much brighter than Earth those little
violet color skewed pixels worth of Venus are going to look.
Actually, with the HDTV's far better than Kodak film DR(dynamic range)
is why the likes of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn should also become part
of those future JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE) obtained images, along with a few
of those most bright of background stars unless having been
intentionally spectrum filtered out or subsequently PhotoShop
removed. With a proper optical spectrum filter (of which KAGUYA may
not have to work with) is where we'll get to see the true deep golden
brownish color of our moon, along with certain other raw secondary/
recoil photons of those cosmic and local deposited mineral elements
which should become downright interesting, even though color skewed
unless via earthshine because, there's such a great deal of secondary/
recoil UV that'll always tend to saturate most everything into giving
us that somewhat purple/bluish or violet hue or weird tint.

And to think that there's going to be so much more of the truth to
come via JAXA/KAGUYA(SELENE), such as once those composite full color
spectrum images of the moon, as properly adjusted for their more
natural to the human eye's limited hue detection worth of color
saturations, plus those other nifty instruments start reporting their
science data, as well as from whatever China can uncover and share is
just around the very next corner.
--
Brad Guth

Very amusing. Nothing in your post makes rational sense.

Car wreck?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:51:14 -0600, "Revision"
wrote:

Very amusing. Nothing in your post makes rational sense.

Car wreck?

....Post-molestation trauma, more likely.

OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

On Nov 21, 9:51 am, "Revision" wrote:
Very amusing. Nothing in your post makes rational sense.

Car wreck?

The whole truth and nothing but the truth is always on your NO FLY
list, so what's your point?

BTW, keep up the good work because, Hitler and his collective of
incest cloned minions (aka pretend atheists) send their best regards.
--
Brad Guth