#1
|
|||
|
|||
Google Scholar
I am also having the same issue. The issue is, the citations of the
two articles are merged. The details of them are given below: 1. Image denoising based on non-local means filter and its method noise thresholding, Signal, Image and Video Processing, Volume 7, Issue 6 , pp 1211-1227, 2014 (DOI:10.1007/s11760-012-0389-y) 2. Image denoising based on gaussian/bilateral filter and its method noise thresholding, Signal, Image and Video Processing, Volume 7, Issue 6 ,pp 1159-1172, 2014 (DOI:10.1007/s11760-012-0372-7) You can observe that, these 2 articles are published in the same issue and volume of the same Journal. These 2 articles have different DOIs. I am wondering why the citations of these two articles are merged even though they have different citations and DOIs. I hope this can be solved. [Mod. note: I doubt it will be solved by posting here! -- mjh] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Google Scholar
In article ,
" writes: I am also having the same issue. The issue is, the citations of the two articles are merged. The details of them are given below: You should have quoted the issue. Was it Google Scholar Citations not doing things right? 1. Image denoising based on non-local means filter and its method noise thresholding, Signal, Image and Video Processing, Volume 7, Issue 6 , pp 1211-1227, 2014 (DOI:10.1007/s11760-012-0389-y) 2. Image denoising based on gaussian/bilateral filter and its method noise thresholding, Signal, Image and Video Processing, Volume 7, Issue 6 ,pp 1159-1172, 2014 (DOI:10.1007/s11760-012-0372-7) You can observe that, these 2 articles are published in the same issue and volume of the same Journal. These 2 articles have different DOIs. I am wondering why the citations of these two articles are merged even though they have different citations and DOIs. I hope this can be solved. Sounds like my problem, though my articles were in different journals. Basically, in my case, Google Article A and Google Article B both point to the real article B in the "Scholar Articles". However, in both cases the citations are mostly for (Google and real) article A. In the case of Google Article A, the number of citations is crossed out and there is an asterisk with a link indicating that something is wrong. It says that this can be fixed by editing by hand, but there are two problems. First, the change is automatically reverted (even if one has chosen the option to get updates confirmed by email); second, real article A seems completely unknown to Google Scholar, although it is not in an obscure journal or anything. Emails to the address supplied for the case that the FAQ doesn't have the answer go unanswered. It looks like Google Scholar isn't interested in fixing things like this. Maybe mentioning this again will cause some reader who has some connection to Google Scholar to get something done via talking to the right people. If not, then maybe we should just forget Google Scholar Citations. Many people have noticed that it tends to have more than ADS. However, this might be because not all of them are correct. ADS isn't complete, but most citations listed there are real and one can actually contact a human to get mistakes fixed and such requests are processed promptly. My suggestion: Forget Google Scholar Citations and use ADS. Anyone interested in bibliometry will know that the former is much worse than the latter. Anyone using the former because of ignorance is not someone you should want to work for anyway. :-) For reference, Google Article A is http://scholar.google.com/citations?...citation&hl=en &oe=ASCII&user=6CcUv5UAAAAJ&pagesize=100&citation_ for_view=6CcU v5UAAAAJqnbT2bcN3wC and B is http://scholar.google.com/citations?...citation&hl=en &oe=ASCII&user=6CcUv5UAAAAJ&pagesize=100&citation_ for_view=6CcU v5UAAAAJ:ldfaerwXgEUC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Google Scholar citations | Phillip Helbig---undress to reply | Research | 0 | July 6th 14 09:03 AM |
Humanist is not humanitarian. On rule of terror, China, Washington,Google. Everybody hates Google. | gb[_3_] | Astronomy Misc | 5 | March 25th 08 01:35 AM |
Twonny Shiksh Pages of pro-Google against shlime Orwell, report him,he ain't like Google watching | gb6726 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 2nd 07 03:37 AM |
Book writers defended themselves against Google, but people are unprotected from Google's piracies | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | March 27th 07 07:48 PM |
not so off subject : Google Local, scholar, etc | Thierry | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | November 21st 04 04:20 PM |