|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
No way swirling masses of hydrogen formed into a star that would last ten billion
years. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral
class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote:
The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they are a gas and gases dissipate. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote: The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they are a gas and gases dissipate. Who says it was all hydrogen? Double-A |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 3:21:25 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote: The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they are a gas and gases dissipate. Who says it was all hydrogen? Double-A Hydrogen is everywhere you go in space. The other elements are not. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:39:23 PM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 3:21:25 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote: On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote: The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they are a gas and gases dissipate. Who says it was all hydrogen? Double-A Hydrogen is everywhere you go in space. The other elements are not. Current thinking is that the Sun formed from the debris left from an older star that exploded. Many different elements would have been fused in that star and spread about this vicinity. Double-A |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:21:25 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote: The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they are a gas and gases dissipate. Who says it was all hydrogen? Double-A Stars are created by nebular clouds.Read up on them and get the imperial thinking picture.Eagle is the one I like best.My thoughts are why they are not more round.Bert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 12:37:31 PM UTC-5, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:21:25 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote: The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they are a gas and gases dissipate. Who says it was all hydrogen? Double-A Stars are created by nebular clouds.Read up on them and get the imperial thinking picture.Eagle is the one I like best.My thoughts are why they are not more round.Bert Nebulas are places where there is a lot of hydrogen and where a lot of stars get together and decide to be born. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
Mark Earnest wrote: No way swirling masses of hydrogen formed into a star that would last ten billion years. Oh oh,....ya discovered our little secret. Every night the old sun is towed away to a Russian rebuilding facility, and replaced by a factory certified identical unit by morning. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EXPLANATION? | bcon1 | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 15th 10 07:40 PM |
Explanation for E=M(C +/- theta)^2 | N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)[_355_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | December 6th 08 08:34 PM |
Explanation for E=M(C +/- theta)^2 | fossilid | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 6th 08 09:21 AM |
The only explanation to the mass psycho problem in the UK is thescientists explanation of mass lead poisoning. All school abilities dropped'dramatically' since the 1970's in the UK. Scientists said that leadpoisoning destroys 1 percent of the frontal | gb[_3_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 30th 08 06:05 AM |
Explanation for Entanglement | Greysky | Misc | 7 | March 19th 06 02:28 PM |