|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[fitsbits] INHERIT and Hierarchical Grouping
Perhaps this EXTTYPE convention should be written up and submitted to
the Registry of conventions. Even though this convention only defines a single new keyword (EXTTYPE), it is a rather fundamental concept that is relevant to many FITS files, and it also has implications on how the reserved EXTNAME keyword should be used. Bill Malcolm J. Currie wrote: Don added these EXT* keywords specifically with Starlink hierarchical data in mind. It's my fault for not picking the omission of an EXTTYPE keyword from the extension paper before publication. It only came blindly obvious once I tried to convert a Starlink NDF dataset into FITS and back to the hierarchical format. Once I'd added an EXTTYPE to record the component data type, to supplement the path within the hierarchy stored in EXTNAME, it was possible to convert to FITS and back to NDF recovering the original structure. -- __________________________________________________ __________________ Dr. William Pence NASA/GSFC Code 662 HEASARC +1-301-286-4599 (voice) Greenbelt MD 20771 +1-301-286-1684 (fax) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[fitsbits] INHERIT and Hierarchical Grouping | Malcolm J. Currie | FITS | 0 | April 17th 07 11:29 PM |
[fitsbits] INHERIT and Hierarchical Grouping | William Pence | FITS | 0 | April 17th 07 10:36 PM |
[fitsbits] INHERIT and Hierarchical Grouping | Steve Allen | FITS | 0 | April 17th 07 09:30 PM |
[fitsbits] INHERIT and Hierarchical Grouping | Doug Tody | FITS | 0 | April 17th 07 09:20 PM |
[fitsbits] INHERIT and Hierarchical Grouping | William Pence | FITS | 0 | April 17th 07 08:25 PM |