|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Another pseudoscientific kook response. This newsgroup should be
renamed to alt.kookastronomy. Paul Lawler wrote: "Mad Scientist" wrote in message t.cable.rogers.com... Like I said before, it's ok for the 'science' crowd to admit the emperor has no clothes, they still applaud anyway. One of the biggest reason we know the big bang is hypnotic blind bull****, is because the science says nothing about invisible spectrums of color. But that is just one reason among many others. Only the blowhard dumbasses like Wally believe in fairytales. I'm sorry... would those be invisible spectrums (sic) like infrared and ultraviolet, or are these magical invisible spectra undetectable by science? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Artist wrote: **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com **** On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 03:10:43 -0700, (gravity jones) wrote: The problem is that he is still Wrong even after he latest speculative flip flop. The reason why? Photons have no mass and none of the properties of mass that Newton used to define "mass". Aren't photons a form of energy and isn't energy a form of mass? Depends on who you listen to. If you listen to the alt.astronomy kooks, then no, light is not a form of mass. If you listen to real scientists, matter is gravitationally trapped light. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|