|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Bill Sheppard" wrote in message ... I can't see why you are saying that an unstable Deuterium atom is not a marker of a hot big bang. Read again. I said it _is_ a (surrogate) marker of a superhot Big Bang. The existance of deuterium is one of the strongest indicators of the BB. oc How about this Idea Matter, deuterium, can absorb Energy, photons at the speed of gravity, 53100km per second. But can only re-release that absorbed energy back out at 300000 km per second, creating an artificial sub 2.7 K environment. H-bomb |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
How about this Idea
Matter, deuterium, can absorb Energy, photons at the speed of gravity, 53100km per second. Huh?? Here's a good, concise little read for you- http://astron.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/d...bndetails.html And how in the world did you deduce the "speed of gravity"? The figure you cite is less than a third the speed of light. The general belief is that gravity "propogates" at the speed of light. And that's under the void-space premise (but we won't go there `chuckle`). oc |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
How about this Idea
Matter, deuterium, can absorb Energy, photons at the speed of gravity, 53100km per second. Huh?? Here's a good, concise little read for you- http://astron.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/d...bndetails.html And how in the world did you deduce the "speed of gravity"? The figure you cite is less than a third the speed of light. The general belief is that gravity "propogates" at the speed of light. And that's under the void-space premise (but we won't go there `chuckle`). oc |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
"Bill Sheppard" wrote in message ... How about this Idea Matter, deuterium, can absorb Energy, photons at the speed of gravity, 53100km per second. Huh?? Here's a good, concise little read for you- http://astron.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/d...bndetails.html And how in the world did you deduce the "speed of gravity"? The figure you cite is less than a third the speed of light. The general belief is that gravity "propogates" at the speed of light. And that's under the void-space premise (but we won't go there `chuckle`). oc Sorry Typo 531000 km per second |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
"Bill Sheppard" wrote in message ... How about this Idea Matter, deuterium, can absorb Energy, photons at the speed of gravity, 53100km per second. Huh?? Here's a good, concise little read for you- http://astron.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/d...bndetails.html And how in the world did you deduce the "speed of gravity"? The figure you cite is less than a third the speed of light. The general belief is that gravity "propogates" at the speed of light. And that's under the void-space premise (but we won't go there `chuckle`). oc Sorry Typo 531000 km per second |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... "Bill Sheppard" wrote in message ... How about this Idea Matter, deuterium, can absorb Energy, photons at the speed of gravity, 53100km per second. Huh?? Here's a good, concise little read for you- http://astron.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/d...bndetails.html And how in the world did you deduce the "speed of gravity"? The figure you cite is less than a third the speed of light. The general belief is that gravity "propogates" at the speed of light. And that's under the void-space premise (but we won't go there `chuckle`). oc Sorry Typo 531000 km per second sqrt(C * C * pi) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... "Bill Sheppard" wrote in message ... How about this Idea Matter, deuterium, can absorb Energy, photons at the speed of gravity, 53100km per second. Huh?? Here's a good, concise little read for you- http://astron.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/d...bndetails.html And how in the world did you deduce the "speed of gravity"? The figure you cite is less than a third the speed of light. The general belief is that gravity "propogates" at the speed of light. And that's under the void-space premise (but we won't go there `chuckle`). oc Sorry Typo 531000 km per second sqrt(C * C * pi) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
In message ,
writes wrote in message ... "Bill Sheppard" wrote in message ... How about this Idea Matter, deuterium, can absorb Energy, photons at the speed of gravity, 53100km per second. Huh?? Here's a good, concise little read for you- http://astron.berkeley.edu/~mwhite/d...bndetails.html And how in the world did you deduce the "speed of gravity"? The figure you cite is less than a third the speed of light. The general belief is that gravity "propogates" at the speed of light. And that's under the void-space premise (but we won't go there `chuckle`). oc Sorry Typo 531000 km per second sqrt(C * C * pi) It's still wrong, in fact it's "not even wrong". I'll leave why as an exercise for the student, as they say. -- "Forty millions of miles it was from us, more than forty millions of miles of void" Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
During a perfect moment of peace at Sat, 20 Sep 2003 04:31:59 -0700
(PDT), (Bill Sheppard) interrupted with: I can't see why you are saying that an unstable Deuterium atom is not a marker of a hot big bang. Read again. I said it _is_ a (surrogate) marker of a superhot Big Bang. The existance of deuterium is one of the strongest indicators of the BB. oc Bill You where asked what it would mean if Deuterium is not stable below 2.7K, you replied it *would not* be a surrogate marker of the BB. My point is that the stability, or otherwise, of Deuterium has nothing to do with its being used as evidence for the BB. As you say, the existence, and its ratio to other light elements is the important point. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|