#18 Logically, you cannot have a force of gravity ; monograph-book:UNIFICATION OF THE FORCES OF PHYSICS AS A COULOMB UNIFICATION

Months back I wrote:

Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.math, sci.astro
From: a_plutonium
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:59:40 -0800 (PST)
Local: Thurs, Jan 17 2008 9:59 pm
Subject: #17 recent news of antimatter in Milky Way galactic center;
monograph-book: UNIFICATION OF THE FORCES OF PHYSICS AS A COULOMB
UNIFICATION

There is some news recently of discovered Antimatter clouds near the
Milky Way galactic center.

Now I write:

This is more of a reflection than anything else. We know E = m c c and
we come to realize that energy
is either coming from electrons which we call chemistry or energy come
from the nucleus of atoms
which we call nuclear physics.

But that leaves one force sticking out. All the other three forces are
related to atoms, but only one
force is not of atoms.

This should have rung the alarm bell in all logical minds, that the
force of gravity is really a pseudoforce.
And that the way to solve this illogic is to say that gravity is the
"smallest amount of a EM force"

Now when I wrote the first edition of the above book in March and
April of 2007, the book outlined where
the Dirac Ocean of positrons that compose Space is the "smallest of
Coulomb attraction" for the matter
in our "electron space of the atom totality". So that the Sun is
electron matter of the electrons of 231Pu
Atom Totality but the Space that the Sun occupies is the Positrons of
the Dirac Ocean of positrons and those
positrons attract the matter of the Sun.

So what that book did in March and April of 2007 was to dispense or
dispell or dismiss the force of gravity
as merely another Coulomb force and the weakest of all Coulomb force
as the attraction of Positron Space
for the Matter of the 94 electrons of the Atom Totality. Space itself
is the Dirac Ocean of Positrons and all
the matter that we see composing the Cosmos is the electron matter of
the 94 electrons of 231Pu.

Now some may wonder why I post this missive? And the answer is that
during the course of my researches
recently I was stimulated by a comment that "energy is invisible".
Well, yes it is. And then I reflected on
E = m c c. Then I reflected on the fact that all energy is either
chemistry energy of electrons or nuclear physics
energy. But, that leaves out gravity.

That is very telling and elucidating. Should we have a force that
sticks out, that is ackward? No we should not
and it only goes to show that it never really was a force.

That gravity is a form of the Coulomb force and modern physics was
never able to assemble gravity as
a Coulomb force with its fake theory of Big Bang. In an Atom Totality
theory as the background, we easily
assemble gravity as a Coulomb force by using Dirac's Ocean of
Positrons that composes what we usually
think of as "Space".

So the reason for this post is mostly to shine a spotlight on the
illogic of modern day physics and physicists
who enter this unification quest and who are unable and too blind to
recognize that gravity sticks out so
badly that why did they not ask "is it really a force or a
pseudoforce."

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies