From NASA's buddies at the IPCC:

New email horrors.

/// The IPCC Process ///

1939 Thorne/MetO:

Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the
tropical
troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and
discount a
wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to
communicate the
uncertainty and be honest. Phil, hopefully we can find time to
discuss these
further if necessary [...]

3066 Thorne:

I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political
spin on it
which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run.

1611 Carter:

It seems that a few people have a very strong say, and no matter
how much
talking goes on beforehand, the big decisions are made at the
eleventh hour by
a select core group.

2884 Wigley:

Mike, The Figure you sent is very deceptive [...] there have been
a number of
dishonest presentations of model results by individual authors and
by IPCC [...]

4755 Overpeck:

The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to
guid[e] what’s
included and what is left out.

3456 Overpeck:

I agree w/ Susan [Solomon] that we should try to put more in the
bullet about
“Subsequent evidence” [...] Need to convince readers that there
really has been
an increase in knowledge – more evidence. What is it?