|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mars One is not feasible
I have discovered that in a paper published in 2016, several researchers
undrscore that this project of colonization of Mars with a one trip colony is UNFEASIBLE: An independent assessment of the technical feasibility of the Mars One mission plan – Updated analysis Acta Astronautica 120 (2016) 192–228 They determine (for instance) that the crew would die after 58 days for lack of CO2 for tyhe crops they need. And many other problems. Actually this is a 100% suicide mission. There is no alternative to robotic exploration in the immediate future. As I have pointed out several times in this group, life in Mars was discovered many times since the Viking lander. Life there would be wiped out by human presence, what nobody seems to care a lot about. I do. Life in Mars should be preserved from all the mostly commercial interests pushing for a human Mars mission. We have screwed this planet. Let's not repeat the same destructive behavior in another one. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Mars One is not feasible
On 2021-04-01 13:00, jacob navia wrote:
I have discovered that in a paper published in 2016, several researchers undrscore that this project of colonization of Mars with a one trip colony is UNFEASIBLE: An independent assessment of the technical feasibility of the Mars One mission plan – Updated analysis Acta Astronautica 120 (2016) 192–228 They determine (for instance) that the crew would die after 58 days for lack of CO2 for tyhe crops they need. And many other problems. Actually this is a 100% suicide mission. There is no alternative to robotic exploration in the immediate future. Bah. "Mars One" was an unprofessional stunt. The existence of one impractical plan does not prove the absence of practical plans. And lack of CO2 on Mars? Where the atmosphere is almost pure CO2? Ridiculous. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mars One is not feasible
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Mars One is not feasible
On Apr/1/2021 at 09:47, Jeff Findley wrote :
In article , lid says... Bah. "Mars One" was an unprofessional stunt. The existence of one impractical plan does not prove the absence of practical plans. And lack of CO2 on Mars? Where the atmosphere is almost pure CO2? Ridiculous. Agree on both points. Jeff You probably haven't read the Acta Astronautica Jacob Navia cited to say that. You also have to take into account the yearly spacetime warp. Alain Fournier |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Mars One is not feasible
On 2021-04-01 18:29, Alain Fournier wrote:
On Apr/1/2021 at 09:47, Jeff Findley wrote : In article , lid says... Bah. "Mars One" was an unprofessional stunt. The existence of one impractical plan does not prove the absence of practical plans. And lack of CO2 on Mars? Where the atmosphere is almost pure CO2? Ridiculous. Agree on both points. Jeff You probably haven't read the Acta Astronautica Jacob Navia cited to say that. True, I haven't read it. I went only by Jacob's description. I'm quite willing to believe that the Acta Astronautica article is good and correct in its critique of Mars One, but I don't believe Jacob's claim that this proves that other plans for Mars habitation are impossible too. You also have to take into account the yearly spacetime warp. Huh? Missing smiley there? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Mars One is not feasible
On Apr/1/2021 at 11:48, Niklas Holsti wrote :
On 2021-04-01 18:29, Alain Fournier wrote: On Apr/1/2021 at 09:47, Jeff Findley wrote : In article , lid says... Bah. "Mars One" was an unprofessional stunt. The existence of one impractical plan does not prove the absence of practical plans. And lack of CO2 on Mars? Where the atmosphere is almost pure CO2? Ridiculous. Agree on both points. Jeff You probably haven't read the Acta Astronautica Jacob Navia cited to say that. True, I haven't read it. I went only by Jacob's description. I'm quite willing to believe that the Acta Astronautica article is good and correct in its critique of Mars One, but I don't believe Jacob's claim that this proves that other plans for Mars habitation are impossible too. You also have to take into account the yearly spacetime warp. Huh? Missing smiley there? I thought we weren't supposed to put the smilies while in the yearly spacetime warp and that the said warp finishes at noon on April 1st :-) Alain Fournier |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Mars One is not feasible
On 2021-04-01 20:58, Alain Fournier wrote:
On Apr/1/2021 at 11:48, Niklas Holsti wrote : On 2021-04-01 18:29, Alain Fournier wrote: ... You also have to take into account the yearly spacetime warp. Huh? Missing smiley there? I thought we weren't supposed to put the smilies while in the yearly spacetime warp and that the said warp finishes at noon on April 1st :-) Aaargh. Facepalm. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Mars One is not feasible
But what about Mars Two, Three, Four.... ?
:-) Dave |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Mars One is not feasible
Il giorno venerdì 9 aprile 2021 alle 19:19:50 UTC+2 David Spain ha scritto:
But what about Mars Two, Three, Four.... ? :-) Dave probably Mars 666 :-)))) and lallo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
is this feasible?? | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 27th 07 11:31 AM |
is this feasible?? | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 27th 07 11:19 AM |
is this feasible?? | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | October 26th 07 06:46 PM |
FWD: [marssocietynewsletter] Gorshkov: Russian manned Mission to Mars by 2020 is Feasible | Space Cadet | Policy | 11 | May 16th 06 07:49 PM |
Is it feasible to land on Mars and come back? | Chung Leong | Technology | 16 | January 18th 04 12:44 AM |