|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
EINSTEINIANA DEAD? (Was: Who wrote "Reflections on relativity"?)
On Jun 16, 2:26 am, Tom Roberts wrote in
sci.physics.relativity: Let me state up front that I don't know who wrote it. Uncle Ben wrote: one of Einstein's two main two reasons for abandoning special relativity as a suitable framework for physics was the fact that, no less than Newtonian mechanics, special relativity is based on the unjustified and epistemologically problematical assumption of a preferred class of reference frames, precisely the issue raised by the twins paradox. Today the "special theory" exists only (aside from its historical importance) as a convenient set of widely applicable formulas for important limiting cases of the general theory, but the phenomenological justification for those formulas can only be found in the general theory. http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s4-07/4-07.htm This quote seems reasonably correct to me. I have known for a long time that the foundations of SR can only be found in GR. Bravo Honest Roberts! Let us put things straight. The statement: "Special relativity is based on the unjustified and epistemologically problematical assumption of a preferred class of reference frames, precisely the issue raised by the twins paradox." seems "reasonably correct" to Tom Roberts. Einsteiniana is, if not dead, at least in agony. Einsteinians are not inclined to defend dead science anymo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218 http://www.orangecow.org/pythonet/sketches/petshop1.htm Owner: Oh yes, the, uh, the Norwegian Blue...What's,uh...What's wrong with it? Mr. Praline: I'll tell you what's wrong with it, my lad. 'E's dead, that's what's wrong with it! Owner: No, no, 'e's uh,...he's resting. Mr. Praline: Look, matey, I know a dead parrot when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now. Owner: No no he's not dead, he's, he's restin'! Remarkable bird, the Norwegian Blue, idn'it, ay? Beautiful plumage! ............................. Mr. Praline: Um...now look...now look, mate, I've definitely 'ad enough of this. That parrot is definitely deceased, and when I purchased it not 'alf an hour ago, you assured me that its total lack of movement was due to it bein' tired and shagged out following a prolonged squawk. Owner: Well, he's...he's, ah...probably pining for the fjords. Mr. Praline: PININ' for the FJORDS?!?!?!? What kind of talk is that?, look, why did he fall flat on his back the moment I got 'im home? Owner: The Norwegian Blue prefers keepin' on it's back! Remarkable bird, id'nit, squire? Lovely plumage! Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP | gaetanomarano | Policy | 3 | September 15th 08 04:47 PM |
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 | gaetanomarano | Policy | 9 | August 30th 08 12:05 AM |
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillati | [email protected][_2_] | Misc | 8 | November 9th 07 05:57 AM |
*WHY* "I" *WROTE* "THE" *STORIES* "I" *TELL*... | Art Deco | Misc | 1 | December 4th 05 12:33 AM |
" Universe matter develop equation" must replace "The theory of relativity" finally | xszxsz | Science | 0 | October 28th 04 08:54 AM |