A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

EINSTEINIANA DEAD? (Was: Who wrote "Reflections on relativity"?)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 16th 09, 07:08 AM posted to alt.philosophy,sci.logic,sci.astro,fr.sci.astrophysique
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default EINSTEINIANA DEAD? (Was: Who wrote "Reflections on relativity"?)

On Jun 16, 2:26 am, Tom Roberts wrote in
sci.physics.relativity:
Let me state up front that I don't know who wrote it.

Uncle Ben wrote:
one of Einstein's two main two reasons for
abandoning special relativity as a suitable
framework for physics was the fact that, no
less than Newtonian mechanics, special relativity
is based on the unjustified and epistemologically
problematical assumption of a preferred class
of reference frames, precisely the issue raised
by the twins paradox. Today the "special theory"
exists only (aside from its historical importance)
as a convenient set of widely applicable formulas
for important limiting cases of the general theory,
but the phenomenological justification for those
formulas can only be found in the general
theory.
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s4-07/4-07.htm


This quote seems reasonably correct to me. I have known for a long time
that the foundations of SR can only be found in GR.


Bravo Honest Roberts! Let us put things straight. The statement:

"Special relativity is based on the unjustified and epistemologically
problematical assumption of a preferred class of reference frames,
precisely the issue raised by the twins paradox."

seems "reasonably correct" to Tom Roberts. Einsteiniana is, if not
dead, at least in agony. Einsteinians are not inclined to defend dead
science anymo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vuW6tQ0218

http://www.orangecow.org/pythonet/sketches/petshop1.htm
Owner: Oh yes, the, uh, the Norwegian Blue...What's,uh...What's wrong
with it?
Mr. Praline: I'll tell you what's wrong with it, my lad. 'E's dead,
that's what's wrong with it!
Owner: No, no, 'e's uh,...he's resting.
Mr. Praline: Look, matey, I know a dead parrot when I see one, and I'm
looking at one right now.
Owner: No no he's not dead, he's, he's restin'! Remarkable bird, the
Norwegian Blue, idn'it, ay? Beautiful plumage!
.............................
Mr. Praline: Um...now look...now look, mate, I've definitely 'ad
enough of this. That parrot is definitely deceased, and when I
purchased it not 'alf an hour ago, you assured me that its total lack
of movement was due to it bein' tired and shagged out following a
prolonged squawk.
Owner: Well, he's...he's, ah...probably pining for the fjords.
Mr. Praline: PININ' for the FJORDS?!?!?!? What kind of talk is that?,
look, why did he fall flat on his back the moment I got 'im home?
Owner: The Norwegian Blue prefers keepin' on it's back! Remarkable
bird, id'nit, squire? Lovely plumage!

Pentcho Valev

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
just THREE YEARS AFTER my "CREWLESS Space Shuttle" article, theNSF """experts""" discover the idea of an unmanned Shuttle to fill the2010-2016 cargo-to-ISS (six+ years) GAP gaetanomarano Policy 3 September 15th 08 04:47 PM
and now, Ladies and Gentlemen, the NSF "slow motion experts" have(finally) "invented" MY "Multipurpose Orbital Rescue Vehicle"... just 20 gaetanomarano Policy 9 August 30th 08 12:05 AM
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillati [email protected][_2_] Misc 8 November 9th 07 05:57 AM
*WHY* "I" *WROTE* "THE" *STORIES* "I" *TELL*... Art Deco Misc 1 December 4th 05 12:33 AM
" Universe matter develop equation" must replace "The theory of relativity" finally xszxsz Science 0 October 28th 04 08:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.