A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Einstein's 1905 Moving Clock

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 17th 20, 05:02 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
Posts: 7,955
Default Einstein's 1905 Moving Clock

Albert Einstein, On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, 1905: "From this there ensues the following peculiar consequence. If at the points A and B of K there are stationary clocks which, viewed in the stationary system, are synchronous; and if the clock at A is moved with the velocity v along the line AB to B, then on its arrival at B the two clocks no longer synchronize, but the clock moved from A to B lags behind the other which has remained at B by tv^2/2c^2 (up to magnitudes of fourth and higher order), t being the time occupied in the journey from A to B." http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

The moving clock lags behind the stationary one AS JUDGED FROM THE STATIONARY SYSTEM - that is what Einstein's 1905 postulates, true or false, entail.

The postulates also entail that, AS JUDGED FROM THE MOVING SYSTEM, the stationary clock lags behind the moving one. The 1905 text quoted above fraudulently implies the opposite. That is, Einstein implicitly suggests that both observers, stationary and moving, will see the moving clock lagging behind the stationary one.

Again: Einstein's 1905 postulates entail that

(A) the moving clock lags behind the stationary one AS JUDGED FROM THE STATIONARY SYSTEM, and the stationary clock lags behind the moving one AS JUDGED FROM THE MOVING SYSTEM.

Einstein abused logic in 1905 and "deduced" that

(B) the moving clock lags behind the stationary one AS JUDGED FROM BOTH SYSTEMS.

Why did Einstein abuse logic? Because (A), the valid deduction, doesn't, but (B), the non sequitur, does imply TIME TRAVEL INTO THE FUTURE - the miracle (idiocy) that converted Einstein into a deity:

Thibault Damour: "The paradigm of the special relativistic upheaval of the usual concept of time is the twin paradox. Let us emphasize that this striking example of time dilation proves that time travel (towards the future) is possible. As a gedanken experiment (if we neglect practicalities such as the technology needed for reaching velocities comparable to the velocity of light, the cost of the fuel and the capacity of the traveller to sustain high accelerations), it shows that a sentient being can jump, "within a minute" (of his experienced time) arbitrarily far in the future, say sixty million years ahead, and see, and be part of, what (will) happen then on Earth. This is a clear way of realizing that the future "already exists" (as we can experience it "in a minute")." http://www.bourbaphy.fr/damourtemps.pdf

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
Old October 17th 20, 10:24 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
Posts: 7,955
Default Einstein's 1905 Moving Clock

It follows logically from Einstein's 1905 postulates that, if two clocks are in relative motion, either clock is slow as judged from the other clock's system (SYMMETRIC time dilation). An obvious implication is that

time SPEEDS UP for any traveler.

That is, any traveler who checks stationary clocks against his spaceship's clocks will find stationary clocks slow and his spaceship's clocks FAST. This also means that the traveler sees himself aging FASTER than stationary people.

This is the valid deduction from Einstein's postulates but it is sterile in terms of predictions (if Einstein had obeyed logic in 1905, his special relativity would not have survived). So high priests in the Einstein cult fraudulently teach that

time SLOWS DOWN for the traveler:

Brian Greene: https://youtu.be/Q1y3YnPgaY4?t=1157

Albert Einstein 1911: "The clock runs slower if it is in uniform motion..." http://einsteinpapers.press.princeto...vol3-trans/368

Richard Feynman: "Now if all moving clocks run slower, if no way of measuring time gives anything but a slower rate, we shall just have to say, in a certain sense, that time itself appears to be slower in a space ship." http://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_15.html

Brian Greene: "If you're moving relative to somebody else, time for you slows down." https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=QnmnLmwBmfE

Neil deGrasse Tyson: "...Einstein's special theory of relativity, which gives the precise prescription for how time would slow down for you if you are set into motion." http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/...ry?id=32191481

Jim Al-Khalili: "Einstein showed that for anything (or anyone) travelling at speeds approaching that of light...time literally runs more slowly." https://scienceinschool.org/2009/issue11/timetravel

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Einstein's 1905 Second Hoax Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 June 14th 20 05:43 PM
Einstein's 1905 Two Sins Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 May 2nd 19 03:47 PM
Einstein's Two Sins of 1905 Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 April 14th 19 07:10 AM
EINSTEIN'S 1905 HOAX Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 September 11th 14 06:51 PM
EINSTEIN 1918 CONTRADICTS EINSTEIN 1905 Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 July 27th 14 09:45 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2020 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.