|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Great Temp. Great Heat Man verses Nature But not for Long Spacetimes
Man's laser hotter than the Sun's surface.for an instant. Sun's great
heat lasts billions of years.Man creates much lower temperature than nature,but not for long. Black hole much colder than the space its imerged in can lock this cold in for billions and billions of years Bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
If you want cold, you must go to the outer edge of the Milky Way.
Empirically, how cold are “ black holes ” Bert ?
I'm talking measured temperature, not theory. Anti-Matter induced gamma-rays from Sagittarius A*, the purported black hole at the center of the Milky Way, makes the sun look like an ice cube. If you want cold, you must go to the outer edge of the Milky Way, where the cold vacuous dark matter is. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
If you want cold, you must go to the outer edge of the Milky Way.
On Jan 27, 10:08 am, Jeff*Relf wrote:
Empirically, how cold are “ black holes ” Bert ? I'm talking measured temperature, not theory. Anti-Matter induced gamma-rays from Sagittarius A*, the purported black hole at the center of the Milky Way, makes the sun look like an ice cube. If you want cold, you must go to the outer edge of the Milky Way, where the cold vacuous dark matter is. Now way, as a black hole has got to be at least a million fold colder than any interstellar void. Is there such a thing as -K? (if not, perhaps there should be) . - Brad Guth |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
If you want cold, you must go to the outer edge of the Milky Way.
On Jan 27, 1:08*pm, Jeff*Relf wrote:
Empirically, how cold are “ black holes ” Bert ? I'm talking measured temperature, not theory. Anti-Matter induced gamma-rays from Sagittarius A*, the purported black hole at the center of the Milky Way, makes the sun look like an ice cube. If you want cold, you must go to the outer edge of the Milky Way, where the cold vacuous dark matter is. Jeff All BH have the same temp about a million times colder than the ether Only motion is created by the great attraction of its central core.Nothing is motionless,and that is the reason absolute zero is impossible. Bert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
We know it's hottest at the center of the Milky Way.
Bert, General Relativity models
what would happen if something were metaphysically dense; but it doesn't not require that something be metaphysically dense. We know your “ black holes are cold ” idea is wrong, Bert, because, empirically, we know it's hottest at the center of the Milky Way, just as it's hottest at the center of the solar system. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
If you want cold, you must go to the outer edge of the Milky Way.
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Jan 27, 10:08 am, Jeff?Relf wrote: Empirically, how cold are " black holes " Bert ? I'm talking measured temperature, not theory. Anti-Matter induced gamma-rays from Sagittarius A*, the purported black hole at the center of the Milky Way, makes the sun look like an ice cube. If you want cold, you must go to the outer edge of the Milky Way, where the cold vacuous dark matter is. Now way, as a black hole has got to be at least a million fold colder than any interstellar void. Is there such a thing as -K? (if not, perhaps there should be) .. - Brad Guth So let me get this right, Brad, BHs are far colder than the lowest temperature in the Universe ?? Oh, I see, that explains the million + degrees of hot jets of particles ejected for billions of miles along its rotational axis by matter about to be sucked into the BH. Black Holes are known for their tremendous gravity. That gravity interprets into extremely high internal pressures. Any internal pressure creates heat. So perhaps you could explain to us dummies where the negative (-) absolute zero temperatures supposedly come from that you claim to exist in a BH. BTW, the rest of the scientific world seems to believe that the lowest temperature anywhere in the visible Universe is about 3 degrees above the absolute, as measured by COBE, with the cute moniker of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation.. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
If you want cold, check out a quiescent BH (Was... )
On Jan 29, 7:10*am, "Hagar" wrote:
So let me get this right... BHs are far colder than the lowest temperature in the Universe ?? *Oh, I see, that explains the million + degrees of hot jets of particles ejected for billions of miles along its rotational axis by matter about to be sucked into the BH. The jets are still `outside` the event horizon, composed of material from the accretion disc that's been "backfired" along the polar axis by a little-understood magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) process. Black Holes are known for their tremendous gravity. *That gravity interprets into extremely high internal pressures. *Any internal pressure creates heat. So perhaps you could explain to us dummies where the negative (-) absolute zero temperatures supposedly come from that you claim to exist in a BH. Frames of referance again. It's certainly mucho hot inside the BH. But from here 'outside', the black body temperature of a quiescent (non- accreting) BH will be very close to absolute zero (discounting any negligible "Hawking radiation"). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
We know it's hottest at the center of the Milky Way.
Jeff Do not like to be called wrong when all is hypothetical thinking.
Are galaxy is creating fusion(new stars in the arms Center of the galaxy you have great BH and that creates an accretion disk as stars are torn apart as the fall into the event horizon. The disk looks like a question mark,and that is a hot spot Bert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Old Coot, we don't care what religion you're espousing.
We don't care what religion you're espousing, Old Coot,
Hagar and I are relating ► empirical science. Although General Relativity can model any density, it prohibits infinitely dense objects. Einstein ► Trashed the “ black hole ” concept in no uncertain terms, because objects falling into a true event horizon would move at unphysical speeds, faster than the speed of light. A true event horizon is forever metaphysical; i.e. it's a pure religion, ► never a science. Even Stephen Hawking no longer believes in true black holes, as the path integral of quantum mechanics forbids it. Although it took Stephen Hawking a long time, he did come into agreement with Einstein... Why can't you ? Sagittarius A*, the purported black hole at the center of the Milky Way, is the hottest part of the galaxy, like the sun is the hottest part of the solar system. Sagittarius A* is surrounded by a 10 kilo light year wide cloud of anti-matter induced gamma rays, as bright as 10 thousand suns: http://News.Yahoo.COM/s/space/200801...MbuhXz_KUPLBIF |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
A true event horizon is forever a religion, never a science.
Einstein proved Black holes can't exist. A lesser mind,
it took Stephen Hawking decades to realize Einstein was right. General Relativitity forbids infinite density. You're espousing a religion Bert, not engagin in “ hypothetical thinking ”. A true event horizon is forever a religion, never a science. What are the ► Facts Bert ? What's hotter ? Sagettarius A* ( the so-called “ frozen star ” ) or the sun ? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
JOLOGICON (GOD) SAYS: DO *NOT* OFFEND ALEXANDER THE GREAT AGAIN MORONS! YOU CAN EVEN DISCUSS BETWEEN YOURSELVES OR CHANGE THE SUBJECT OF THE DISCUSSION, BUT DO NOT OFFEND ALEXANDER THE GREAT AGAIN! JOLOGICON CONTROLS GOOGLE! | Saul Levy | Misc | 2 | November 11th 05 06:28 AM |
Great Astronomers - and Great Astronauts, too! | Painius | Misc | 0 | October 13th 05 06:45 PM |
A 'Great Comet' is long overdue? | robert | Astronomy Misc | 8 | September 12th 05 06:57 PM |
Great Astronomers - The Great DEBATE | Painius | Misc | 0 | August 30th 05 09:41 PM |