|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
finding impact deposits on the moon?
I'm interested in finding places on the Moon where an asteroid has
impacted, and left behind a deposit of elements not normally in abundance on the Moon. (Some of our richest mines on Earth stem from such impacts.) I'm thinking of things like precious metals, which are enriched in NEAs but rare on Earth and on the Moon (probably because they tend to sink to the center of any differentiated body). My thinking is that, while NEAs often offer a great selection of elements at a very affordable delta-V, they are often inconveniently far away. Mining a deposit on the Moon might be substantially easier (and once a mass driver is in place, the delta-V for launching things from the Moon becomes mostly a non-issue). I'm starting to study the Clementine and Lunar Prospector data now, and catch up on some of the papers written about them. And yes, I'm willing to do my homework. But I'm wondering whether anyone here can give me a nudge in the right direction: What's the best way to hunt for these impact deposits? Neither Clementine nor Lunar Prospector seem to have any direct way to detect things like platinum, but is there some particular pattern of the elements they do track (H, U, Th, K, O, Si, Mg, Fe, Ti, Al, and Ca) which would indicate "not ordinary lunar material"? Many thanks, - Joe |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
finding impact deposits on the moon?
Joe Strout wrote:
I'm interested in finding places on the Moon where an asteroid has impacted, and left behind a deposit of elements not normally in abundance on the Moon. In general I suspect this will not be a good way of finding "ore". During a hypervelocity impact, the impactor is generally vaporized completely, and a good bit of the native rock melted as well. Some of our richest mines on Earth stem from such impacts. Really? Which ones? The Sudbury ore deposts are not associated with the impact structure, and things like Barringer crater in the SW have proven just the opposite (a lot of time and money spent looking for an "ore body" that doesn't exist). I'm thinking of things like precious metals, which are enriched in NEAs but rare on Earth and on the Moon (probably because they tend to sink to the center of any differentiated body). A lot of what we consider "rare" metals are siderophiles, and so end up being sequestered in the iron core if differentiation occurs. For the Earth, that locks a lot of Pt-group elements in the core, and for the Moon they likely ended up locked in the Earth's core as well. But it's not a mass or density issue - for instance, it seems uranium ends up enhanced in the crust (it's a lithophile). while NEAs often offer a great selection of elements at a very affordable delta-V, they are often inconveniently far away. Distance cost you nothing but time (transit time), while a gravity well will always cost you energy (even if you can get it from some local source, like sunlight... which is only local half the time on most of the lunar surface anyway). A mass driver represents a reasonably efficient way to use energy to acelerate mass, but you still need the energy in the first place, so I'm not sure I'd call it a "non-issue". Perhaps the real question is how to locate good candidate NEO's with a good mix of easily captured metals or volatiles. And then how to get them to market (or create the market where they are; issues for both a lunar or asteroidal origin for the materials). Mining a deposit on the Moon might be substantially easier Moon: likely low ore quality, some local power (solar), but your product is at the bottom of a gravity well. Asteroid: potentially very very high ore quality, unlimited local power (solar), product very cost effective to move around the solar system. Downsides are a lack of gravity (new refining techniques) and perhaps delivery times. What's the best way to hunt for these impact deposits? Unfortunately, on the main subject of your post, I confess to a lack of answers. I'm unfamilier with the Clementine & Lunar Prospector data on these points. I'd suggest looking up the elemental composition of known asteroidal or meteoric samples, as use those as guides. The composition of terrestrial ore bodies is likely nearly worthless (having been formed under radically different conditions and by very different processes). -- Brian Davis |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
finding impact deposits on the moon?
"Joe Strout" wrote in message ... I'm interested in finding places on the Moon where an asteroid has impacted, and left behind a deposit of elements not normally in abundance on the Moon. (Some of our richest mines on Earth stem from such impacts.) I'm thinking of things like precious metals, which are enriched in NEAs but rare on Earth and on the Moon (probably because they tend to sink to the center of any differentiated body). My thinking is that, while NEAs often offer a great selection of elements at a very affordable delta-V, they are often inconveniently far away. Mining a deposit on the Moon might be substantially easier (and once a mass driver is in place, the delta-V for launching things from the Moon becomes mostly a non-issue). I'm starting to study the Clementine and Lunar Prospector data now, and catch up on some of the papers written about them. And yes, I'm willing to do my homework. But I'm wondering whether anyone here can give me a nudge in the right direction: What's the best way to hunt for these impact deposits? Neither Clementine nor Lunar Prospector seem to have any direct way to detect things like platinum, but is there some particular pattern of the elements they do track (H, U, Th, K, O, Si, Mg, Fe, Ti, Al, and Ca) which would indicate "not ordinary lunar material"? Many thanks, - Joe I think it is pie in the sky at the present time. But if I had to make a suggestion, I'd say try the Artistarchus plateau. That would be the most obviously place I would start my search. George |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
finding impact deposits on the moon?
Joe Strout wrote:
I'm interested in finding places on the Moon where an asteroid has impacted, and left behind a deposit of elements not normally in abundance on the Moon. (Some of our richest mines on Earth stem from such impacts.) I'm thinking of things like precious metals, which are enriched in NEAs but rare on Earth and on the Moon (probably because they tend to sink to the center of any differentiated body). My thinking is that, while NEAs often offer a great selection of elements at a very affordable delta-V, they are often inconveniently far away. Mining a deposit on the Moon might be substantially easier (and once a mass driver is in place, the delta-V for launching things from the Moon becomes mostly a non-issue). I'm starting to study the Clementine and Lunar Prospector data now, and catch up on some of the papers written about them. And yes, I'm willing to do my homework. But I'm wondering whether anyone here can give me a nudge in the right direction: What's the best way to hunt for these impact deposits? Neither Clementine nor Lunar Prospector seem to have any direct way to detect things like platinum, but is there some particular pattern of the elements they do track (H, U, Th, K, O, Si, Mg, Fe, Ti, Al, and Ca) which would indicate "not ordinary lunar material"? Many thanks, - Joe Well, let's see ... first you go to the Moon, then you look for impact craters. Once you've found a crater, you must probe it for valuable elements. Shouldn't take long, considering how few impact craters the Moon has on its surface. Jack |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
finding impact deposits on the moon?
In article t,
Jack Crenshaw wrote: What's the best way to hunt for these impact deposits? Neither Clementine nor Lunar Prospector seem to have any direct way to detect things like platinum, but is there some particular pattern of the elements they do track (H, U, Th, K, O, Si, Mg, Fe, Ti, Al, and Ca) which would indicate "not ordinary lunar material"? Well, let's see ... first you go to the Moon, then you look for impact craters. Once you've found a crater, you must probe it for valuable elements. Sorry, maybe I was unclear -- I was asking for the best way to hunt for these in existing data sets. Thanks, - Joe |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
finding impact deposits on the moon?
"Joe Strout" wrote in message ... In article t, Jack Crenshaw wrote: What's the best way to hunt for these impact deposits? Neither Clementine nor Lunar Prospector seem to have any direct way to detect things like platinum, but is there some particular pattern of the elements they do track (H, U, Th, K, O, Si, Mg, Fe, Ti, Al, and Ca) which would indicate "not ordinary lunar material"? Well, let's see ... first you go to the Moon, then you look for impact craters. Once you've found a crater, you must probe it for valuable elements. Sorry, maybe I was unclear -- I was asking for the best way to hunt for these in existing data sets. Thanks, - Joe Well, for one, the dust on the moon contains titanium, as indicated in Clementine and other data, though the abundance is variable (the mare basalts apparently are low in titanium). The moon is virtually devoid of hydrogen, except possibly near the south pole (stay tuned). Clementine and Apollo data also indicates that the moon is relatively rich in K, Th, Mg, Fe, and Al. Mineral maps using Clementine data indicate the rocks poor in Aluminum are rich in Iron, and visa versa. http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/WebImg/feMoon.gif Here is another part of the article that you may find to be useful: http://www.psrd.hawaii.edu/Dec04/LunarCrust.html George |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Astronomy Misc | 5 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) | Nathan Jones | Misc | 6 | July 29th 04 06:14 AM |
The apollo faq | the inquirer | Astronomy Misc | 11 | April 22nd 04 06:23 AM |
significant addition to section 25 of the faq | heat | Astronomy Misc | 1 | April 15th 04 01:20 AM |
The Apollo FAQ (moon landings were faked) | Nathan Jones | UK Astronomy | 8 | February 4th 04 06:48 PM |