Our Taboo/Nondisclosure Moon

"captain." wrote in message
news:6Q7Ch.102329$Y6.94270@edtnps89

so you're saying that acceptance is what you want even if it means accepting
a relatively low position in the social hierarchy of your peers? that should
be easy to do. you just need to kiss a little ass here and there.

That is correct, plus having that very brown-nose is what sort of goes
along with that ride.

However, I'm not exactly sure they could pay me enough to actually sit
passively that far back in their infomercial spewing bus, of accepting
such conditional laws of physics and of evidence excluding as though on
steroids.

Secondly, I'm not actually anti faith based, just anti LLPOF faith
based, which unfortunately is what sort of eliminates a good number of
those mainstream religious cults right off the bat. So, they can even
toss in some religious flak if it'll help sell their GOOGLE/NOVA
infomercial to a wider base of humanity. After all, whatever visiting
ETs or Venusians could be those nice Cathars, or worse yet, Muslims.
-
Brad Guth




--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Paul Mc" wrote in message
ups.com


Brad Guth wrote:

Terrestrial and/or of whatever's of terrestrial satellite communications
with whatever's utilizing the moon's L1 isn't the least bit of a problem
for existing technology, especially if using FM/quantum binary packets
via laser beams.

Might I further ask; How many terabytes per second or rather per ms
would you like to transfer?

Please forgive this very ignorant follow-up question, but do such laser
beams work over such vast distances and through atmospheric conditions
or are you taking about satellite to station communications?

Sorry that I'd missed this one for so long.

Those laser cannons of a proper spectrum (say 400~450 nm) should
actually do just fine and dandy at getting vast amounts of such data
packets through those thick Venusian clouds, as transmitted from Earth
or best as created from a satellite parked within Venus L2.

I have some rough math that's probably not correct, but it'll more than
prove my point.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:eae6e59d5164ece11a955239ae99df47.49644@mygate .mailgate.org

Where's Venus as of Apollo missions A11, A14 and A16?

Where's that official NASA/Apollo interactive 3D simulator, or of any
other solar system simulator that which supposedly proves Venus was
never within a given FOV as from the moon, and therefore was supposedly
nowhere in sight as of missions A11, A14 and A16?

From the moon, Venus would actually for its FOV given size should have
appeared and thereby recorded upon such unfiltered film as looking
somewhat brighter and looking a touch more violet than Earth.

A few examples (of which there are many others available) of terrestrial
obtained images that so happen to include our moon, which due to our
polluted atmosphere are not even half as vibrant as if such had been
obtained as unfiltered and thereby chuck full of near-UV plus UV-a
spectrum energy as if obtained from space, or best as easily viewed from
the physically dark surface of our moon, whereas the dynamic range of
Kodak film was simply far more than sufficient, especially considering
how physically dark and nasty our moon actually should have been, and
even more so of having depicted such dark looking lunar terrain if those
cameras had been utilizing a polarised optical element (of which they
did).

Images of the occultation of Venus by the Moon on July 17 2001 processed
for neutral sky color

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu... off%26sa%3DN

moon + Jupiter + other moon venus occultation / conjunctions
http://static.flickr.com/34/71342628_843c2e91e3.jpg
http://www.occultations.net/moon-jupiter.jpg
http://hometown.aol.com/astropjm/images/solar4-mars.jpg
http://hometown.aol.com/astropjm/images/sol1.jpg
http://www5.ocn.ne.jp/~kawas/jpg/S182vx3.jpg
http://dvaa.org/Photos/TomBash/VenusOcc.html
http://www.astro-photography.com/pla...onjunction.htm

Jupiter - Moon occultation, as taken by Becky Coretti with Bill
Williams, using a 15" Obsession and a Tom O Compact Platform, as per
using a rather pathetic ToUCam along with a TeleVue 4x Powermate.
Within the same FOV and obviously exposed for the same amount of time,
whereas Jupiter is obviously more than bright enough to have been
recorded by a Kodak moment, especially of having an unfiltered look-see
from the surface of our physically dark moon.
http://www.equatorialplatforms.com/moon.saturn.jpg
Imagine how much brighter Venus would have recorded. Even Mars and
Saturn should have recorded within most any given Kodak moment as long
as such were within any number of acceptable FOVs while taking all of
those thousands of pictures. Of course those pesky other items above
the horizon would have represented small bits of such items within view
of the typical lens in use, but still will within the film and lens
resolution to have been easily and unavoidably recorded.

As it stands, team KECK as well as anyone involved with the grand
ruse/sting of our mutually perpetrated cold-war, are each forbidden as
to obtaining such occultation images, as such images would only go to
further prove how often we've been lied to by those of us having "the
right stuff" (after all, it's what our government and of their religious
puppeteers do best).
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:eae6e59d5164ece11a955239ae99df47.49644@mygate .mailgate.org

It seems that now these pesky Usenet MIB are into diverting if not
shutting down as much of my access to Mailgate/Usenet as possible, as
though somehow that's a viable tactic that's going to alter the truth
and nothing but the truth, and thus save thy infomercial spewing butts.
Keeping such hot topics off their publicly accessed index page is also
another rather pathetic ruse, wouldn't you say.

In addition to all that's clearly ongoing as having been officially
MI/NSA orchestrated as taboo/nondisclosure (damage-control) about most
anything Venus, it seems there's still more bad news that we can all use
about our silly moon, which for good damn reasons hasn't quite been
walked upon.

NASA insiders expose Apollo Hoax / banished from Mailgate

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...2a2ea85ea88d70

http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/sc...smart&p=1/1963

If these pro-NASA folks accept their own fundamental notions that our
warm and fuzzy NASA/Apollo expertise have photographed our moon's
physically dark terrain along with mother Earth as coexisting within the
same FOV, and especially interesting is of their Kodak film's DR(dynamic
range) as having rather easily recorded portions of our dark oceans that
are worth an albedo of perhaps 0.1 (entirely similar enough as to the
moon itself), whereas the absolute impressive and somewhat blue/violet
peak spectrum as representing the nearby vibrance of Venus should have
been unavoidably recorded as well. Especially well recorded via those
unfiltered optics that should otherwise have been nearly if not
overloaded with such a gauntlet of all those extra near-UV and UV-a
spectrums worth of photons as having reacted rather nicely with those
highly reflective clouds, which offers us the visual albedo of 0.7~0.8
to work with, whereas the actual peak solar spectrum energy and roughly
reflecting 75% of that 4 kw/m2 is what their naked and unfiltered Kodak
eye had to deal with.

Yet lo and behold, not even from orbit or otherwise from those supposed
EVAs upon the deck had there once been any sign of Venus, much less of
any other significant planets, as well as never once accommodating the
bluish-white vibrant speck of the Sirius star system, all of which were
well within the DR(dynamic range) of those unfiltered Kodak moments, yet
as though such entirely significant items that should have been easily
recorded were never once to be seen (especially odd as of those
NASA/Apollo missions A11, A14 and A16).

As I've often stipulated before, that most any interactive 3D solar
system simulator puts Venus smack within good EVA obtained views of at
least those three missions (always within each of their command module's
orbital view), and I might as well further add, that we have those free
cellphone cameras with apparently far better DR and of a wider spectrum
capability than what our newest MESSENGER mirror optics and spendy 14+db
CCD could apparently muster, as proof-positive via their flyby of Earth
which only provided us with a rather naked looking and otherwise
somewhat pastel view of Earth, w/o even so much as once accommodating
our physically dark moon, much less having shared upon any other
significant planets or stars that simply had to be there, yet all such
other items were getting artificially made as invisible/stealth as were
all of those Muslim WMD.

Remember that starshine as well as earthshine upon the moon is
absolutely vibrant to the unfiltered Kodak eye that's far more sensitive
to having recorded such near-UV and UV-a spectrums than our human eye,
which can't hardly if even detect, not to mention those pesky gamma and
hard-X-ray spectrums of which that moon of our's is absolutely chuck
full of such TBI(total body irradiation) dosage that's simply much worse
off than any lethal hot zone within our Van Allen belts, and that's
still not even including upon all of the continual thermal trauma of
their having to survive those double IR/FIR spectrums that also
coexisted, as coming at their naked moonsuit from nearly all surrounding
directions in addition to whatever sol was directly contributing.

That physically dark and somewhat salty moon of ours is what's actually
a darn good IR/FIR reflector, and otherwise represents a rather ****
poor UV reflector because, such UV energy often gets absorbed and/or
interacts as creating secondary/recoil photons of the [UV black light
generated] near-blue spectrum. Of course the solar and cosmic influx is
what also represents lethal buttloads of having generated those
secondary/recoil photons of gamma and hard-X-rays, with zilch worth of
any attenuation from all possible directions, meaning that your wussy
moonsuit is surrounded by an absolute minimum lethal gauntlet of 3.14e6
m2 that's contributing the full secondary spectrum worth of whatever's
downright nasty if not lethal to your frail DNA, as well as continually
impacting each and every physically more than boiling role of all that
sensitive Kodak film.

Wayne Throop:
If you substitute venus for earth, it'd show up in the shot.
Even if you move earth far away, it'd still show up, until it's so far
away its light is falling on less than a single grain of the photograph;
but as long as its idealized image is at least a single grain big, that
grain would still be exposed.

Instead, we see a somewhat naked guano island like reflective
environment, for as far as the human and unfiltered Kodak eyes could
see, in places having a thin and naturally terrestrial clumping 50/50
dusting of portland cement and cornmeal that was entirely xenon lamp
spectrum illuminated (meaning w/o UV), whereas instead of their having
to deal with whatever the raw and nearly point source of the extremely
contrasty solar spectrum should have had to offer, along with such raw
influx having unavoidably shared absolute extra loads worth of the
near-UV and UV-a energy. Therefore, there's absolutely nothing of such
hocus-pocus artificial content within such bogus images, or otherwise of
mission associated content, that's worth a freaking hoot, much less a
scientific hoot.

Of course there's many other iffy if not downright naysay worthy
fly-by-rocket and still unproven lunar lander factors that simply do not
add up to what those pesky regular laws of physics and of replicated
science and of otherwise proven lander technology has to say.

Sorry that the likes of "Wayne Throop", "rick_so" and myself as your
pesky historical revisionist team, and otherwise truth telling
messengers from hell, must continually **** on your silly hocus-pocus
parade.
-
Brad Guth

Of a similar topic that's worthy of open disclosu
Velikovsky/Neocatastrophism Sources / banished from Mailgate

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.o...a52739c889bcc2

http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/rec/rec.org.mensa/Pbb1h.956$CT5.551%40trnddc02?order=smart&p=1/469


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

If our moon remains as officially taboo/nondisclosure, then what?

Are we going to nuke the likes of China for their attempting to take
command of our moon's L1?

Are we going to ABL anything in sight, that's within its 100 MW laser
cannon's IR range?
-
Brad Guth

"Brainal Leakage" wrote in message
ups.com...
If our moon remains as officially taboo/nondisclosure, then what?


See if there's anything good on TV?

Are we going to nuke the likes of China for their attempting to take
command of our moon's L1?


Depends on the answer to the first question. If American Idol isn't on,
might as well nuke China cuz there's nothing else to do. We know the recipe
for general tsao's chicken so they have out-lived their usefullness. There
is no longer any need to keep them around.

Are we going to ABL anything in sight, that's within its 100 MW laser
cannon's IR range?
-
Brad Guth


Questions #1 and #2 not withstanding, zapping things with high powered
lasers is always good clean fun.

On Mar 18, 3:41 am, "The First Solutrean"
wrote:
"Brainal Leakage" wrote in message

ups.com...

If our moon remains as officially taboo/nondisclosure, then what?

See if there's anything good on TV?

Are we going to nuke the likes of China for their attempting to take
command of our moon's L1?

Depends on the answer to the first question. If American Idol isn't on,
might as well nuke China cuz there's nothing else to do. We know the recipe
for general tsao's chicken so they have out-lived their usefullness. There
is no longer any need to keep them around.

Are we going to ABL anything in sight, that's within its 100 MW laser
cannon's IR range?
-
BradGuth

Questions #1 and #2 not withstanding, zapping things with high powered
lasers is always good clean fun.

Our very own salty moon and of its L1 holy grail is still taboo/
nondisclosure, and of or mostly Jewish mainstream folks really don't
give a tinkers damn as to how much GW that massive and neaby sucker
has been causing us. You folks also make fun of the ongoing
collateral damage and carnage of the innocent, just like the Third
Reich and of their Jewish minions knowingly accomplished on behalf of
their very own resident LLPOF warlord(Hitler).

Our warm and fuzzy NASA has been nothing but multiple train wrecks
from their perpetrated cold-war get go. Telling us lies upon lies is
in fact what they do best, in infomercial format that's made to look
as though it's based upon actual physics and good science.

Their primary Old Testament train of "up yours" has been off the
tracks and yet somehow still taking us to hell ever since we hired
those smart Jewish Third Reich rocket scientists that typically claim
to know more than God, and that was and still is foremost on behalf of
their knowing more of how to screw humanity and of how to pillage and
otherwise rape and trash our frail environment for all it's worth, and
then some.

By their not having accomplished the LSE-CM/ISS (Clarke Station on
tethers), or by otherwise not having gone to visit with those nearby
Venusians or of their visiting ETs, is proof positive that we're all
being summarily screwed by way of those having "the right stuff".
-
Brad Guth

wrote in message
oups.com...
On Mar 18, 3:41 am, "The First Solutrean"
wrote:
"Brainal Leakage" wrote in message

ups.com...

If our moon remains as officially taboo/nondisclosure, then what?

See if there's anything good on TV?

Are we going to nuke the likes of China for their attempting to take
command of our moon's L1?

Depends on the answer to the first question. If American Idol isn't on,
might as well nuke China cuz there's nothing else to do. We know the
recipe
for general tsao's chicken so they have out-lived their usefullness.
There
is no longer any need to keep them around.

Are we going to ABL anything in sight, that's within its 100 MW laser
cannon's IR range?
-
BradGuth

Questions #1 and #2 not withstanding, zapping things with high powered
lasers is always good clean fun.

Our very own salty moon and of its L1 holy grail is still taboo/
nondisclosure, and of or mostly Jewish mainstream folks really don't
give a tinkers damn as to how much GW that massive and neaby sucker
has been causing us. You folks also make fun of the ongoing
collateral damage and carnage of the innocent, just like the Third
Reich and of their Jewish minions knowingly accomplished on behalf of
their very own resident LLPOF warlord(Hitler).

Our warm and fuzzy NASA has been nothing but multiple train wrecks
from their perpetrated cold-war get go. Telling us lies upon lies is
in fact what they do best, in infomercial format that's made to look
as though it's based upon actual physics and good science.

Their primary Old Testament train of "up yours" has been off the
tracks and yet somehow still taking us to hell ever since we hired
those smart Jewish Third Reich rocket scientists that typically claim
to know more than God, and that was and still is foremost on behalf of
their knowing more of how to screw humanity and of how to pillage and
otherwise rape and trash our frail environment for all it's worth, and
then some.

By their not having accomplished the LSE-CM/ISS (Clarke Station on
tethers), or by otherwise not having gone to visit with those nearby
Venusians or of their visiting ETs, is proof positive that we're all
being summarily screwed by way of those having "the right stuff".
-
Brad Guth


"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"

On Mar 18, 11:21 am, "The First Solutrean"
wrote:
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"

How totally pathetic, and otherwise par for the course. No wonder
this Usenet sucks and blows on behalf of polishing all that's NASA/
Apollo.
-
Brad Guth

"Goofy Guth" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Mar 18, 11:21 am, "The First Solutrean"
wrote:
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"
"All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy"

How totally pathetic, and otherwise par for the course. No wonder
this Usenet sucks and blows on behalf of polishing all that's NASA/
Apollo.
-
Brad Guth


Apollo missions are long over. In fact, many people say they never happened.
It was all faked...like Cheney's Iraq evidence.

If you would like to learn more about space, read my posts.