|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
"Carey Sublette" :
There has been more than a bench demonstration, this system is a modernized version of the first Soviet thermonuclear device build by the Sakarov team. Evidence? You own site tells (or told at some time) about that reaction for the first soviet H-bomb. If I recall well, you told even that the soviet team had done it without the supercomputer used to model the Ulam's compression scheme. Yvan Bozzonetti. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Damon Hill :
Where does one gets He3 and He4 anyway? I thought those isotopes were extremely rare? 4He is ordinary helium, used to inflate meteorological balloons for example. 3He is another matter.You have to work with an university to get it. Yvan Bozzonetti. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Earl Colby Pottinger :
Cheap power is military power! Even if it is as big as a house for the smallest design most large military ships could use it for unlimited travel range. Most countries would use it to extend the life of thier oil reserves. Most countries want cheap power to drive thier economics so the country can produce more wealth, thus more taxes, thus more money for the military. Recall: This is an explosive process, not a controled reaction. The only experiment was half a century ago, when fission was said to be an energy source too cheap to meter. So why to bother with mastering another process? Now it is different, but you can't start a new nuclear fusion program from the blue. You need first a pressur group and so on... Even if it can be done privately, there is the proliferation problem. Solve it and something could be done. Yvan Bozzonetti. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
From Earl Colby Pottinger :
Then you are either wrong about the costs or you really don't have a design to look at. Pocket money for many people is in the millions and for many companies in the billions. Why not appoach them? In the real world, you don't ask for millions without something more than a paper concept. You must have a proven track and particularly a facility able to do what you tell you will do. On the practical side, I build a technical facility for similar projects. Where? In South-East France. Yvan Bozzonetti. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Earl Colby Pottinger :
Well, fusion is not my first objective. It could be a later byproduct. No fusion, no-one will care! Have you seen that from the terrorism side? My objective is may be 80% in common with fusion, I don't want to open the last 20%. Are you ready to turn yourself the last key? Yvan Bozzonetti. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Earl Colby Pottinger :
I don't think it was humor. The way to wrote it up there seemed to be not reason why a bench demo could not done. It could indeed be given a trial. Yvan Bozzonetti. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Earl Colby Pottinger :
Why not just buy a flask of it for a lot less. Earl Colby Pottinger 3He is very costly, it is not in the LN2 price range! you have to keep it cool. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
(Azt28) :
From Earl Colby Pottinger : Then you are either wrong about the costs or you really don't have a design to look at. Pocket money for many people is in the millions and for many companies in the billions. Why not appoach them? In the real world, you don't ask for millions without something more than a paper concept. You must have a proven track and particularly a facility able to do what you tell you will do. In the real world you can appoach people with a paper concept. The paper are called engineering plans. You however seem to think people should be impressed with a bunch of buzz-words. What you have written so far is a bunch of meaningless gobby-gook. Sorry that is how con-artists work. On the practical side, I build a technical facility for similar projects. Where? In South-East France. What a nice information free claim, South-East France is a big place. Implied with the where is, what is the name of the place, it's exact location, what does it do, who did you build it for. I mean for all we know your technical facility could be an advance tiolet. Nothing wrong with build it, but it says nothing about your knowledge of fusion systems. Yvan Bozzonetti. Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
(Azt28) :
"Carey Sublette" : There has been more than a bench demonstration, this system is a modernized version of the first Soviet thermonuclear device build by the Sakarov team. Evidence? You own site tells (or told at some time) about that reaction for the first soviet H-bomb. If I recall well, you told even that the soviet team had done it without the supercomputer used to model the Ulam's compression scheme. Yvan Bozzonetti. Supercomputer? What supercomputer? There never were any supercomputers in existance at the time of the first H-bombs. Again I smell con-artist. Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ted Taylor autobiography, CHANGES OF HEART | Eric Erpelding | Policy | 3 | November 14th 04 11:32 PM |
A new astronomical solution for the calibration of a geological timescale (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 26th 04 05:38 AM |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
Proposed Theoretical Adjustments to Project Orion | Diginomics | Policy | 4 | April 21st 04 01:25 AM |
Next 2 pc Orion 80 ED are now tested | Markus Ludes | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 30th 04 02:05 PM |