kill all the stupid people

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:15:38 -0700, Angelocracy.com wrote:

http://angelocracy.blogspot.com/

If your blog is so stupid, irrelevant and boring that you have to spam the
news groups with it then I suggest you get another hobby.



--
I told you this was going to happen.

Tim wrote:
humble.life wrote:
Angelocracy.com wrote:
http://angelocracy.blogspot.com/

ANOTHER 'MODEST PROPOSAL
The text below is a copy of a column that was in a high school
newspaper. After the school principal read the column, he confiscated
all copies of the paper. Then had the teacher in charge of the
newspaper removed.

Another 'modest proposal' by Justin Jones
Published on: 10/23/07

For a millennium, the world has been plagued with stupid people
corrupting society and *******izing the value of life for all of
mankind.

The intellectually handicapped have been reproducing at a
substantially greater rate than those with a fully functional brain.

The problem of the unintelligent reproducing is, and has been, a
serious threat to society that has gone unchecked for far too long. It
is the responsibility of man to solve this problem before a reverse
Darwinism takes effect.

It is depressing to think (especially at the high school age) that
people with a high IQ are generally stereotyped as "geeks" or "nerds"
because they choose to do more intellectually stimulating activities
like homework, and reading, instead of those activities preferred by
their peers like power lifting, full contact football without head
protection, or crushing cans on one's head. So while the intelligent
are exiled from the masses, the ignorant are cherished and embraced.

Due to the substantial amount of low IQ reproduction and
relatively low amount of high IQ reproduction, the intelligent become
fewer and farther between.

Since mankind obviously cannot control itself enough to make
strides for the future, the populace spins into an out of control
state of reverse Darwinism where the stupid people survive and the
smart people perish.

Some form of action must be taken, one which can be governed
effectively and immediately to pull a populace from a malevolent
tailspin toward disaster.

First off, charity should be outlawed. No longer should people be
allowed to use their children as a source of income. People who cannot
afford to have kids simply should not have kids. Unemployment benefits
also must be disbanded - go get a job. That isn't to say those with
disabilities should not be helped, but not with handouts, just a hand.
One of the greatest minds of the century, Stephen Hawking, is
immobile. Yet the courageous Mr. Hawking still manages to make strides
in the areas of physics, despite being confined to his wheelchair.

Second, the government should compile a standardized test to
thoroughly analyze any and all 5th grade students in the country for
IQ levels. Based on the results of the test, those who perform in the
bottom 25 percent should be executed. The executions will not be
inhumane; simple lethal injections while one sleeps would be
sufficient. With the bottom of every class systematically removed,
over time the world would inevitably thrive and prosper like never
before.

It is true that, without the unintelligent, there will be no one
to mess up one's order at the local fast food joint, or people on the
news to give one something humorous to talk about at the water cooler
at work the next morning, but that is a sacrifice, as a race, that
simply must be made.

http://angelocracy.blogspot.com/


why did they fire the teacher?

the teacher is utterly correct.


Eugenics. The preserve of self appointed pseudo intellectuals
and fools.


And then all the people that love dog-award shows.

On 10/24/07 5:15 AM, in article
, "Angelocracy.com"
wrote:

http://angelocracy.blogspot.com/

ANOTHER 'MODEST PROPOSAL
The text below is a copy of a column that was in a high school
newspaper. After the school principal read the column, he confiscated
all copies of the paper. Then had the teacher in charge of the
newspaper removed.

Another 'modest proposal' by Justin Jones
Published on: 10/23/07

For a millennium, the world has been plagued with stupid people
corrupting society and *******izing the value of life for all of
mankind.

The intellectually handicapped have been reproducing at a
substantially greater rate than those with a fully functional brain.

The problem of the unintelligent reproducing is, and has been, a
serious threat to society that has gone unchecked for far too long. It
is the responsibility of man to solve this problem before a reverse
Darwinism takes effect.

It is depressing to think (especially at the high school age) that
people with a high IQ are generally stereotyped as "geeks" or "nerds"
because they choose to do more intellectually stimulating activities
like homework, and reading, instead of those activities preferred by
their peers like power lifting, full contact football without head
protection, or crushing cans on one's head. So while the intelligent
are exiled from the masses, the ignorant are cherished and embraced.

Due to the substantial amount of low IQ reproduction and
relatively low amount of high IQ reproduction, the intelligent become
fewer and farther between.

Since mankind obviously cannot control itself enough to make
strides for the future, the populace spins into an out of control
state of reverse Darwinism where the stupid people survive and the
smart people perish.

there's no reason to suppose that the smart/stupid ratio has changed at any
time in history. we've always bumbled along much the same way. one thing
about the stupid, they tend to be robust. as a population, they seem to be
better at survival and to do it more enthusiastically. their extermination,
were it possible, could spell doom for the human race.

Some form of action must be taken, one which can be governed
effectively and immediately to pull a populace from a malevolent
tailspin toward disaster.

First off, charity should be outlawed. No longer should people be
allowed to use their children as a source of income. People who cannot
afford to have kids simply should not have kids. Unemployment benefits
also must be disbanded - go get a job. That isn't to say those with
disabilities should not be helped, but not with handouts, just a hand.

get this kid a copy of the ayn rand amnibus.

One of the greatest minds of the century, Stephen Hawking, is
immobile. Yet the courageous Mr. Hawking still manages to make strides
in the areas of physics, despite being confined to his wheelchair.

Second, the government should compile a standardized test to
thoroughly analyze any and all 5th grade students in the country for
IQ levels. Based on the results of the test, those who perform in the
bottom 25 percent should be executed. The executions will not be
inhumane; simple lethal injections while one sleeps would be
sufficient. With the bottom of every class systematically removed,
over time the world would inevitably thrive and prosper like never
before.

the problem with standardized intelligence tests is that there isn't anyone
intelligent enough to devise and administer them properly. maybe we should
get stephen hawking to zap everyone he thinks is a dummy with space rays. he
seems like a bright fellow.

It is true that, without the unintelligent, there will be no one
to mess up one's order at the local fast food joint,

smart people don't eat at fast food joints :-[

On 10/24/07 10:14 AM, in article , "kT"
wrote:

Jester's mummy wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:15:38 -0700, "Angelocracy.com"
wrote:

(((*http://angelocracy.blogspot.com/
(((*
(((* ANOTHER 'MODEST PROPOSAL
(((*The text below is a copy of a column that was in a high school
(((*newspaper. After the school principal read the column, he confiscated
(((*all copies of the paper. Then had the teacher in charge of the
(((*newspaper removed.
(((*
(((* Another 'modest proposal' by Justin Jones
(((* Published on: 10/23/07
(((*
(((* For a millennium, the world has been plagued with stupid people
(((*corrupting society and *******izing the value of life for all of
(((*mankind.
(((*
(((* The intellectually handicapped have been reproducing at a
(((*substantially greater rate than those with a fully functional brain.

snip...

(((* Second, the government should compile a standardized test to
(((*thoroughly analyze any and all 5th grade students in the country for
(((*IQ levels. Based on the results of the test, those who perform in the
(((*bottom 25 percent should be executed. The executions will not be
(((*inhumane; simple lethal injections while one sleeps would be
(((*sufficient. With the bottom of every class systematically removed,
(((*over time the world would inevitably thrive and prosper like never
(((*before.
(((*
(((* It is true that, without the unintelligent, there will be no one
(((*to mess up one's order at the local fast food joint, or people on the
(((*news to give one something humorous to talk about at the water cooler
(((*at work the next morning, but that is a sacrifice, as a race, that
(((*simply must be made.

sarcasm
The kid should be given a failing grade for plagiarizing Jonathan Swift, and
the
teacher deserves to be fired for not spotting the plagiarism.
/sarcasm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Modest_Proposal

Sheesh, what's wrong with the principal, anyway? Doesn't he understand the
whole
point of satire??????????

These are the same people that think that extracurricular sports are
absolutely essential for a good education. We did the same thing back in
the early seventies, but we couldn't get the regular school newspaper to
print any of our satire, so we ran an underground newspaper called :

The Grand Wazoo. (we used Frank Zappa plagiarisms exclusively)

It was a big hit. The shut us down immediately and confiscated the
mimeograph machine, and threatened everybody with jail time, which was
not wholly unreasonable considering some of the satire in that thing.

constitutional free speech guarantees are all very well, but the real
craftsmen know that authority can always be pushed to the point where it
will take action to shut you the **** up.

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:55:07 -0400, cal wrote:

On 10/24/07 5:15 AM, in article
, "Angelocracy.com"
wrote:

First off, charity should be outlawed. No longer should people be
allowed to use their children as a source of income. People who cannot
afford to have kids simply should not have kids. Unemployment benefits
also must be disbanded - go get a job. That isn't to say those with
disabilities should not be helped, but not with handouts, just a hand.

get this kid a copy of the ayn rand amnibus.

Yep... it's always nice to hear complete crap like this coming from
someone who's never had to support themselves or a family... A quick cure
to his ignorance, make him start paying rent.

....and he evidently doesn't know that the employee as well as the employer
pays for unemployment insurance. I assume he's talking about welfare...
and if it wasn't for welfare I would have been living on the streets in my
teens... and I've only been unemployed for three months in the last
twenty-five years.

Anyone who thinks like this should be blessed with the gift of unrelenting
hard times.

--
I told you this was going to happen.

On Oct 24, 9:55 am, cal wrote:

there's no reason to suppose that the smart/stupid ratio has changed at any
time in history. we've always bumbled along much the same way. one thing
about the stupid, they tend to be robust. as a population, they seem to be
better at survival and to do it more enthusiastically. their extermination,
were it possible, could spell doom for the human race.

Before we learned how to commercially and/or faith-base pillage,
plunder and rape our own kind and the environment at the same time as
we lie our infomercial spewing butts off, humans used to be a whole
lot nicer and really smart at surviving in spite of their having to
live in caves, or worse.
- Brad Guth -

"humble.life" wrote in message
...
Angelocracy.com wrote:
http://angelocracy.blogspot.com/

ANOTHER 'MODEST PROPOSAL
The text below is a copy of a column that was in a high school
newspaper. After the school principal read the column, he confiscated
all copies of the paper. Then had the teacher in charge of the
newspaper removed.

Another 'modest proposal' by Justin Jones
Published on: 10/23/07

For a millennium, the world has been plagued with stupid people
corrupting society and *******izing the value of life for all of
mankind.

The intellectually handicapped have been reproducing at a
substantially greater rate than those with a fully functional brain.

The problem of the unintelligent reproducing is, and has been, a
serious threat to society that has gone unchecked for far too long. It
is the responsibility of man to solve this problem before a reverse
Darwinism takes effect.

It is depressing to think (especially at the high school age) that
people with a high IQ are generally stereotyped as "geeks" or "nerds"
because they choose to do more intellectually stimulating activities
like homework, and reading, instead of those activities preferred by
their peers like power lifting, full contact football without head
protection, or crushing cans on one's head. So while the intelligent
are exiled from the masses, the ignorant are cherished and embraced.

Due to the substantial amount of low IQ reproduction and
relatively low amount of high IQ reproduction, the intelligent become
fewer and farther between.

Since mankind obviously cannot control itself enough to make
strides for the future, the populace spins into an out of control
state of reverse Darwinism where the stupid people survive and the
smart people perish.

Some form of action must be taken, one which can be governed
effectively and immediately to pull a populace from a malevolent
tailspin toward disaster.

First off, charity should be outlawed. No longer should people be
allowed to use their children as a source of income. People who cannot
afford to have kids simply should not have kids. Unemployment benefits
also must be disbanded - go get a job. That isn't to say those with
disabilities should not be helped, but not with handouts, just a hand.
One of the greatest minds of the century, Stephen Hawking, is
immobile. Yet the courageous Mr. Hawking still manages to make strides
in the areas of physics, despite being confined to his wheelchair.

Second, the government should compile a standardized test to
thoroughly analyze any and all 5th grade students in the country for
IQ levels. Based on the results of the test, those who perform in the
bottom 25 percent should be executed. The executions will not be
inhumane; simple lethal injections while one sleeps would be
sufficient. With the bottom of every class systematically removed,
over time the world would inevitably thrive and prosper like never
before.

It is true that, without the unintelligent, there will be no one
to mess up one's order at the local fast food joint, or people on the
news to give one something humorous to talk about at the water cooler
at work the next morning, but that is a sacrifice, as a race, that
simply must be made.

http://angelocracy.blogspot.com/


why did they fire the teacher?

the teacher is utterly correct.

Remove the word "stupid" and I'll sign up ;o)

On 10/24/07 1:43 PM, in article
, "BradGuth"
wrote:

On Oct 24, 9:55 am, cal wrote:

there's no reason to suppose that the smart/stupid ratio has changed at any
time in history. we've always bumbled along much the same way. one thing
about the stupid, they tend to be robust. as a population, they seem to be
better at survival and to do it more enthusiastically. their extermination,
were it possible, could spell doom for the human race.

Before we learned how to commercially and/or faith-base pillage,
plunder and rape our own kind and the environment at the same time as
we lie our infomercial spewing butts off, humans used to be a whole
lot nicer and really smart at surviving in spite of their having to
live in caves, or worse.

as we get increasingly dumb, we survive longer and in far greater numbers.

kT wrote:

Rowland McDonnell wrote:
kT wrote:

[snip]

These are the same people that think that extracurricular sports are
absolutely essential for a good education.

And they're right.

Which is exactly why America is involved in another stupid illegal
unnecessary and extremely deadly and expensive foreign war.

puzzled No it's not. That all started as a result of the USA
discovering during 1939-1945 that war was very good for business. This
gave rise to the USA's state-funded `industrial-military complex' and
that's why you're involved in another war - the war profiteers need to
convince the US congress to continue to support them by buying more and
more expensive equipment and services.

And the US population swallows the propaganda and lets 'em. The
population has been that dumb since the end of the Second World War when
all this started with madly paranoid US Cold War propaganda lies about
the USSR - which was never interested in /invading/ anywhere except for
the purposes of defending its borders (hence the whole Warsaw Pact and
Afghanistan things). The idea of the USSR was that capitalism would
collapse through the inevitable march of history and they just had to
wait. Well, *something* collapsed through the inevitable march of
history and it doesn't appear to have been capitalism, does it?

Dumb em down, it's good for profits.

Eh? There's nothing dumb about bringing up children to have a healthy
mind in a healthy body, and you get that by making sure there's plenty
of physical exercise for 'em. School sports is good for that.

So what on Earth are you on about?

We did the same thing back in
the early seventies, but we couldn't get the regular school newspaper to
print any of our satire, so we ran an underground newspaper called :

The Grand Wazoo. (we used Frank Zappa plagiarisms exclusively)

Not a bad source.

It was a big hit. The shut us down immediately and confiscated the
mimeograph machine,

Sounds like it was the crime of theft that they committed from where I'm
sat.

No, we were using the library A/V mimeograph, and after they confiscated
that, we moved it to a commercial mimeograph, and they confiscated that.

In the second case, that sounds like theft to me.

and threatened everybody with jail time, which was
not wholly unreasonable considering some of the satire in that thing.

What? My god! What country was this in? I've never heard of jail for
satire outside of repressive nations such as the USSR or China or Nazi
Germany - but I get the idea that this was in the USA. Am I right?

It was extremely vivid satire.

What of it?

There's no excuse for imprisoning people for expressing ideas.
Encouraging criminal activity - well, that's a different matter. But
jail for satire? That only happens in repressive nations, that does.

Nice rant, though.

I hope you don't mind too much that I didn't read it.

I hope you don't mind me considering you to be an ignorant and
mannerless barbarian.

Rowland.

--
Remove the animal for email address:
Sorry - the spam got to me
http://www.mag-uk.org http://www.bmf.co.uk
UK biker? Join MAG and the BMF and stop the Eurocrats banning biking

On 10/24/07 1:28 PM, in article , "Ivan
Marsh" wrote:

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:55:07 -0400, cal wrote:

On 10/24/07 5:15 AM, in article
, "Angelocracy.com"
wrote:

First off, charity should be outlawed. No longer should people be
allowed to use their children as a source of income. People who cannot
afford to have kids simply should not have kids. Unemployment benefits
also must be disbanded - go get a job. That isn't to say those with
disabilities should not be helped, but not with handouts, just a hand.

get this kid a copy of the ayn rand amnibus.

Yep... it's always nice to hear complete crap like this coming from
someone who's never had to support themselves or a family... A quick cure
to his ignorance, make him start paying rent.

...and he evidently doesn't know that the employee as well as the employer

pays for unemployment insurance. I assume he's talking about welfare...
and if it wasn't for welfare I would have been living on the streets in my
teens... and I've only been unemployed for three months in the last
twenty-five years.

Anyone who thinks like this should be blessed with the gift of unrelenting
hard times.

well, he's evidently just a high-school kid. we aren't born knowing these
things. the point with stuff like this isn't to shut it down, a reaction far
more stupid and outrageous than anything he said, but to debate with it
pedagogically. and to be prepared for the kid to score points.