|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Mars "Reference Mission" illustrated
"Elden" wrote in message thlink.net...
---------- In article , h (Rand Simberg) wrote: That's because cars require much higher power than planetary rovers. The latter don't require high speed, or acceleration. Although this is true, it may be irrelevant here. The vehicle that is depicted here is _big_. Not only would the solar power have to provide life support, heat, electronics, etc., but it also has to move that vehicle around. Even if the top speed is only a few miles per hour, it is a sizeable vehicle. Add to that the fact that one of the illustrations shows it pulling around the hab vehicle, and that increases the power requirements. There's no reasonable chance of a manned vehicle being actually "Solar Powered" directly, even on Mars. It's going to have to be battery powered and recharged by Solar power. And, actually, that could make quite a lot of sense on Mars, there need not even be Solar Panels on the rover except as backup (which is always a good idea). On Earth, battery powered cars are actually feasible, and can travel long distances at reasonably high speeds carrying reasonably heavy loads. However, they are vastly inferior to internal combustion powered automobiles so they are at best niche equipment. But on Mars ordinary IC engines won't work, and similar systems have various difficulties in operation. Personally, I think the CH4 powered engines in the Mars Direct plan are a really, really good idea, but they are not the only option. Additionally, the reduced gravity of Mars would improve the performance of a battery powered car (reducing the effective weight of the chassis and batteries). Especially since a Mars manned rover is going to be "heavy" by Earth standards (pressurized, large interior volume to fit suited astronauts, etc.) the additional weight of batteries won't make all that much difference. So, you outfit your rover with batteries, make sure it has a decent range off the batteries, and slap some PV cells on the roof to allow it to recharge or slow crawl, just in case. Actually, such a rover would have an unlimited range, provided the crew could be kept alive. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Mars "Reference Mission" illustrated
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA Extends Mars Rovers' Mission | Ron | Science | 0 | April 8th 04 07:04 PM |
Japan admits its Mars probe is failing | JimO | Policy | 16 | December 6th 03 02:23 PM |
Delta-Like Fan On Mars Suggests Ancient Rivers Were Persistent | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | November 13th 03 09:06 PM |
Booster Crossing | Chuck Stewart | Space Shuttle | 124 | September 15th 03 12:43 AM |
NASA Selects UA 'Phoenix' Mission To Mars | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | August 4th 03 10:48 PM |