|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#582
|
|||
|
|||
Why Colonize Space?
In article , Quadibloc writes:
On Jul 29, 1:30=A0pm, wrote: In sci.physics Greg Goss wrote: One of the Niven/Pournelle books has the first interstellar colony paid for by the National Geographic Society. With a total income (not profit, income) in 2008 of $650 million, they couldn't afford to send a house cat into LEO. This is true. But I remember purchasing at a remainder counter a book by someone who proposed colonizing space with setting up a magazine, similar to the National Geographic, as his first step to raise money for the venture! Apparently Savage doesn't realize the key to making a small fortune in publishing. -- Michael F. Stemper #include Standard_Disclaimer Life's too important to take seriously. |
#583
|
|||
|
|||
Why Colonize Space?
Wayne Throop wrote: No. It wouldn't. Because it wouldn't be a "massless thing with an engine". Because your requirements, namely "massless thing" and "with an engine", are mutually contradictory. And of course because all "massless things" move at exactly lightspeed. Except the starship Enterprise, which uses its warp field to turn it into a massless thing with an engine. Transparent aluminum...aye, laddie, that be the ticket: http://dvice.com/archives/2009/07/scientists-crea.php Pat Pat |
#584
|
|||
|
|||
Why Colonize Space?
On Jul 30, 11:35 am, (Michael Stemper)
wrote: Apparently Savage doesn't realize the key to making a small fortune in publishing. Start with a large fortune? |
#585
|
|||
|
|||
Why Colonize Space?
William December Starr wrote: Whatever _did_ happen to all those manganese nodules that were just lying there on the ocean floor waiting to be vacuumed up, anyway? They are still down there, it's just that no one has figured out a way to economically dredge them up that's cheaper than making magnesium by extracting it from seawater. Diamonds, on the other hand: http://www.miningweekly.com/article/...ime-2008-06-06 Pat |
#586
|
|||
|
|||
Why Colonize Space?
In article , trag writes:
On Jul 30, 11:35 am, (Michael Stemper) wrote: Apparently Savage doesn't realize the key to making a small fortune in publishing. Start with a large fortune? Got it in one! -- Michael F. Stemper #include Standard_Disclaimer Twenty-four hours in a day; twenty-four beers in a case. Coincidence? |
#587
|
|||
|
|||
Why Colonize Space?
In article tatelephone, Pat Flannery writes:
William December Starr wrote: Whatever _did_ happen to all those manganese nodules that were just lying there on the ocean floor waiting to be vacuumed up, anyway? They are still down there, it's just that no one has figured out a way to economically dredge them up that's cheaper than making magnesium by extracting it from seawater. If we went to space, we could develop such methods! -- Michael F. Stemper #include Standard_Disclaimer In my cheek? Oh, it appears to be my tongue. |
#588
|
|||
|
|||
Why Colonize Space?
wrote
Sean O'Hara wrote wrote Giga" "Giga" just(removetheseandaddmatthe wrote Greg Goss wrote They laughed at Columbus because they knew that the water tanks and food supplies on his ship could never let him reach Japan. And you know what? The intellectuals were right about that. But ships very often stopped somewhere, like a small island, to resupply such things. And what islands might that be? If we assume as a point of departure that the Americas are submerged, say one kilometer, there'd be a huge archipelago consisting of the Andes, Rockies, Sierra Nevadas, etc, and a smaller one for the Appalachians. Columbus still could've landed on Hispanola, though it would've been a small island chain. In that scenario, you are less than half way to Japan. Absent a good map, the odds of stumbling upon one of the few islands on the way to Japan is near zero. Have fun explaing how come plenty managed fine with pacific islands. Magellan managed that fine. |
#589
|
|||
|
|||
Why Colonize Space?
William December Starr wrote:
(Wayne Throop) said At least nobody claims we "should" colonize underwater because it'd shield from some disasters that could overtake the surface-dwellers. Nor, for that matter, to mine the extensive manganese deposits, etc. Whatever _did_ happen to all those manganese nodules that were just lying there on the ocean floor waiting to be vacuumed up, anyway? They're still there, not economic to mine. |
#590
|
|||
|
|||
Why Colonize Space?
:: your requirements, namely "massless thing" and "with an engine", are
:: mutually contradictory. And of course because all "massless things" :: move at exactly lightspeed. : Pat Flannery : Except the starship Enterprise, which uses its warp field to turn it : into a massless thing with an engine. Where was it stated that the warp field made the ship massless? That seems quite at odds with the way it's portrayed in any of the seriesses. Wayne Throop http://sheol.org/throopw |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bill Stone is determined to colonize outer space | [email protected][_1_] | Policy | 4 | July 2nd 07 12:25 AM |
Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes | G. L. Bradford | Policy | 33 | April 1st 06 07:02 PM |
Why Colonize Space? Because We Are Dealing In Absolutes | G. L. Bradford | Policy | 3 | March 31st 06 02:22 AM |
Let's Colonize the Universe | Rudolph_X | Astronomy Misc | 21 | March 23rd 04 08:04 PM |
Best asteroids to colonize? | Hop David | Technology | 3 | August 14th 03 07:12 PM |