|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
No way swirling masses of hydrogen formed into a star that would last ten billion
years. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral
class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote:
The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they are a gas and gases dissipate. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote: The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they are a gas and gases dissipate. Who says it was all hydrogen? Double-A |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 3:21:25 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote: The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they are a gas and gases dissipate. Who says it was all hydrogen? Double-A Hydrogen is everywhere you go in space. The other elements are not. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:39:23 PM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 3:21:25 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote: On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote: The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they are a gas and gases dissipate. Who says it was all hydrogen? Double-A Hydrogen is everywhere you go in space. The other elements are not. Current thinking is that the Sun formed from the debris left from an older star that exploded. Many different elements would have been fused in that star and spread about this vicinity. Double-A |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 4:54:40 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:39:23 PM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 3:21:25 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote: On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote: The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that almost all stars form by this process. That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they are a gas and gases dissipate. Who says it was all hydrogen? Double-A Hydrogen is everywhere you go in space. The other elements are not. Current thinking is that the Sun formed from the debris left from an older star that exploded. Many different elements would have been fused in that star and spread about this vicinity. Double-A Quite impossible. By the time remnants of an exploding star reached our forming solar system it was so dissipated there was virtually nothing left. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
OK, so enlighten us.
How did the Sun ( and other stars ) come about ? And, please don't give us the crap about how God did this or God did that. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
On Sunday, July 15, 2018 at 7:16:27 AM UTC-5, casagi... wrote:
OK, so enlighten us. How did the Sun ( and other stars ) come about ? And, please don't give us the crap about how God did this or God did that. Don't give me that nonsense that everything somehow assembled itself! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
No Explanation for the Sun
And, please don't give us the crap about how God did this or God did that. Don't give me that nonsense that everything somehow assembled itself! Well, it most certainly did, because there's obviously no God in charge of things. Any God would be responsible for all the bad as well as the good. That includes this plague, that famine or draught, this crop failure, that dictator ( yes even Hitler and aspiring Trump ). Oh, I guess I forgot, "God works in mysterious ways" Sheeesh ! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
EXPLANATION? | bcon1 | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 15th 10 07:40 PM |
Explanation for E=M(C +/- theta)^2 | N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)[_355_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | December 6th 08 09:34 PM |
Explanation for E=M(C +/- theta)^2 | fossilid | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 6th 08 10:21 AM |
The only explanation to the mass psycho problem in the UK is thescientists explanation of mass lead poisoning. All school abilities dropped'dramatically' since the 1970's in the UK. Scientists said that leadpoisoning destroys 1 percent of the frontal | gb[_3_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 30th 08 06:05 AM |
Explanation for Entanglement | Greysky | Misc | 7 | March 19th 06 03:28 PM |