|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hubble to be abandoned
They do have "diet chocolate" ya know. Atkins diet, low-carb candy bars, some of them are made with stuff like whole cream. some like atrkins brownies are really great. the next step for the food industry is zero calorie food that tastes great/ eat all you want feel full with near zero calories. its already here splenda a sweetner is real yummy and has zero caloriories, like some diet pop. they have to do this or the entire workld will be fat and ill |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Hallerb" wrote in message ... some like atrkins brownies are really great. Is "Atrkins" yet another diet? How does it compare to Atkins? This clearly can't be a simple spelling mistake on your part, what with you quoting a post that included "Atkins" properly spelled. Must be yet another research project for you. By the way, how is your research into whether or not you did research into alternative shuttle failure modes coming? its already here splenda a sweetner is real yummy and has zero caloriories, like some diet pop. Yes, but is it calorie-free? they have to do this or the entire workld will be fat and ill The entire world wasn't "fat and ill" *before* Spenda came into existence. In fact, very little of the world was fat before the industrial revolution. The problem isn't the foods, it's overindulgince and laziness. Your personal experience attests to this. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Scott Hedrick wrote:
Is "Atrkins" yet another diet? How does it compare to Atkins? This clearly can't be a simple spelling mistake on your part, what with you quoting a post that included "Atkins" properly spelled. [...] The entire world wasn't "fat and ill" *before* Spenda came into existence. ^^^^^^ I love it when a spelling flame includes spelling errors. Paul |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Paul F. Dietz" wrote in message ... Scott Hedrick wrote: Is "Atrkins" yet another diet? How does it compare to Atkins? This clearly can't be a simple spelling mistake on your part, what with you quoting a post that included "Atkins" properly spelled. [...] The entire world wasn't "fat and ill" *before* Spenda came into existence. ^^^^^^ I love it when a spelling flame includes spelling errors. Where are the misspelled words? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Paul F. Dietz" wrote in message ... Scott Hedrick wrote: Is "Atrkins" yet another diet? How does it compare to Atkins? This clearly can't be a simple spelling mistake on your part, what with you quoting a post that included "Atkins" properly spelled. [...] The entire world wasn't "fat and ill" *before* Spenda came into existence. ^^^^^^ I love it when a spelling flame includes spelling errors. Ah, I see. I've apparently caught "hallerb-fever". |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The problem isn't the foods, it's overindulgince and laziness. Your personal
experience attests to this. Scott H a serious suggestion. Today in the US about 23% of the population is seriously overweight. Thats sad no matter what the cause since that weight can make people ill and does lead to early death. Now lets assume the percentage of posters here is less but I KNOW for a fact there are some people here who are heavy enough to qualify for weight loss surgery. I have heard from a few of them after I posted my story. you are just making yourself less popular with MOs and those who have close family and friends who are MO. Of course none of this will register with you. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Hallerb" wrote in message ... Now lets assume the percentage of posters here is less but I KNOW for a fact there are some people here who are heavy enough to qualify for weight loss surgery. You get fat because you consume more calories than your body needs. No matter the reason, including hormones, you cannot gain weight if you consume less than your body needs. Weight loss surgery is a valid alternative for those who find they cannot control themselves. Recently, Blue Cross decided to stop covering gastric-bypass surgery because it considered the matter frivolous- that is, it's clear that non-surgical methods work when used properly, but they fail because of the inability of people to control themselves. I don't know if that's just in Florida or nationwide. You, on the other hand, overindulge yourself with unsupported flames and repeatedly prove that you are too lazy to bother with even the least bit of research before posting. Of course none of this will register with you. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Scott Hedrick wrote:
You get fat because you consume more calories than your body needs. No matter the reason, including hormones, you cannot gain weight if you consume less than your body needs. ....in the long run. If your biochem is screwy enough, you'll put on weight and die quickly... ;-) -- -Andrew Gray |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 09:05:04 -0500, "Scott Hedrick"
wrote: "Hallerb" wrote in message ... some like atrkins brownies are really great. Is "Atrkins" yet another diet? How does it compare to Atkins? This clearly can't be a simple spelling mistake on your part, what with you quoting a post that included "Atkins" properly spelled. A spelling/typo error flame. its already here splenda a sweetner is real yummy and has zero caloriories, like some diet pop. Yes, but is it calorie-free? they have to do this or the entire workld will be fat and ill The entire world wasn't "fat and ill" *before* Spenda came into existence. Then committed a spelling/typo error himself. Motes and beams, maybe? Or glass houses? Mary -- Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
You get fat because you consume more calories than your body needs. No matter the reason, including hormones, you cannot gain weight if you consume less than your body needs. Just as some cars are very fuel efficent and others arent people have the same issues. Blue cross is just trying to save $ in many states theere are laws requiring coverage of weight loss surgery. Blues are going to loose big on this. BTW the NIH national institue of health suggests gastric bypass for those MOs. Scott be glad you and yours arent suffering from being MO, its a terrible DISEASE, and is classfied as such. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA Is Not Giving Up On Hubble! (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 2nd 04 01:46 PM |
Congressional Resolutions on Hubble Space Telescope | EFLASPO | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | April 1st 04 03:26 PM |
Don't Desert Hubble | Scott M. Kozel | Space Shuttle | 54 | March 5th 04 04:38 PM |
Don't Desert Hubble | Scott M. Kozel | Policy | 46 | February 17th 04 05:33 PM |
Hubble images being colorized to enhance their appeal for public - LA Times | Rusty B | Policy | 4 | September 15th 03 10:38 AM |